Effects of Prone Position on Lung Recruitment and Ventilation-Perfusion Matching in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Combined CT Scan/Electrical Impedance Tomography Study.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2022
01 05 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
2
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
entrez:
24
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prone positioning allows to improve oxygenation and decrease mortality rate in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS). However, the mechanisms leading to these effects are not fully understood. The aim of this study is to assess the physiologic effects of pronation by the means of CT scan and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Experimental, physiologic study. Patients were enrolled from October 2020 to March 2021 in an Italian dedicated COVID-19 ICU. Twenty-one intubated patients with moderate or severe C-ARDS. First, patients were transported to the CT scan facility, and image acquisition was performed in prone, then supine position. Back to the ICU, gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation and perfusion EIT-based analysis were provided toward the end of two 30 minutes steps (e.g., in supine, then prone position). Prone position induced recruitment in the dorsal part of the lungs (12.5% ± 8.0%; p < 0.001 from baseline) and derecruitment in the ventral regions (-6.9% ± 5.2%; p < 0.001). These changes led to a global increase in recruitment (6.0% ± 6.7%; p < 0.001). Respiratory system compliance did not change with prone position (45 ± 15 vs 45 ± 18 mL/cm H2O in supine and prone position, respectively; p = 0.957) suggesting a decrease in atelectrauma. This hypothesis was supported by the decrease of a time-impedance curve concavity index designed as a surrogate for atelectrauma (1.41 ± 0.16 vs 1.30 ± 0.16; p = 0.001). Dead space measured by EIT was reduced in the ventral regions of the lungs, and the dead-space/shunt ratio decreased significantly (5.1 [2.3-23.4] vs 4.3 [0.7-6.8]; p = 0.035), showing an improvement in ventilation-perfusion matching. Several changes are associated with prone position in C-ARDS: increased lung recruitment, decreased atelectrauma, and improved ventilation-perfusion matching. These physiologic effects may be associated with more protective ventilation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35200194
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005450
pii: 00003246-202205000-00001
pmc: PMC9005091
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
723-732Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Mauri received funding from the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy (ricerca corrente 2020). Dr. Mauri’s institution received funding from Fisher and Paykel and Draeger; he received funding from Fisher and Paykel, Draeger, and BBraun. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al.; the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium: Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020; 323:2052–2059
Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, et al.; COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network: Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180:1345–1355
Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al.; PROSEVA Study Group: Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368:2159–2168
Coppo A, Bellani G, Winterton D, et al.: Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): A prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8:765–774
COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU Investigators: Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: A prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2021; 47:60–73
Guérin C, Beuret P, Constantin JM, et al.; investigators of the APRONET Study Group, the REVA Network, the Réseau recherche de la Société Française d’Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR-recherche) and the ESICM Trials Group: A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: The APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44:22–37
Langer T, Brioni M, Guzzardella A, et al.; PRONA-COVID Group: Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: A multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients. Crit Care. 2021; 25:128
Poston JT, Patel BK, Davis AM: Management of critically ill adults with COVID-19. JAMA. 2020; 323:1839–1841
Mathews KS, Soh H, Shaefi S, et al.; Study of the treatment and outcomes in critically ill patients with Coronavirus Disease (STOP-COVID) Investigators: Prone positioning and survival in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019-related respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49:1026–1037
Weiss TT, Cerda F, Scott JB, et al.: Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: A retrospective observational cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2021; 126:48–55
Spinelli E, Mauri T: Why improved PF ratio should not be our target when treating ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021; 87:752–754
Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, et al.: COVID-19 pneumonia: Different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46:1099–1102
Perier F, Tuffet S, Maraffi T, et al.: Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and proning on ventilation and perfusion in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020; 202:1713–1717
Kiefmann M, Tank S, Tritt MO, et al.: Dead space ventilation promotes alveolar hypocapnia reducing surfactant secretion by altering mitochondrial function. Thorax. 2019; 74:219–228
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al.: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996; 22:707–710
Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, et al.: Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:1775–1786
Grasso S, Terragni P, Mascia L, et al.: Airway pressure-time curve profile (stress index) detects tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:1018–1027
Wrigge H, Zinserling J, Muders T, et al.: Electrical impedance tomography compared with thoracic computed tomography during a slow inflation maneuver in experimental models of lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008; 36:903–909
Mauri T, Spinelli E, Scotti E, et al.: Potential for lung recruitment and ventilation-perfusion mismatch in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome from coronavirus disease 2019. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48:1129–1134
Bluth T, Kiss T, Kircher M, et al.: Measurement of relative lung perfusion with electrical impedance and positron emission tomography: An experimental comparative study in pigs. Br J Anaesth. 2019; 123:246–254
Chiumello D, Busana M, Coppola S, et al.: Physiological and quantitative CT-scan characterization of COVID-19 and typical ARDS: A matched cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46:2187–2196
Ball L, Robba C, Maiello L, et al.; GECOVID (GEnoa COVID-19) group: Computed tomography assessment of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Crit Care. 2021; 25:81
Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Vitale G, et al.: Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 1991; 74:15–23
Gattinoni L, Taccone P, Carlesso E, et al.: Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 188:1286–1293
Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Carlesso E: Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure: Impact and clinical fallout through the following 20 years. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39:1909–1915
Galiatsou E, Kostanti E, Svarna E, et al.: Prone position augments recruitment and prevents alveolar overinflation in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 174:187–197
Beloncle FM, Pavlovsky B, Desprez C, et al.: Recruitability and effect of PEEP in SARS-Cov-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2020; 10:55
Grasso S, Stripoli T, De Michele M, et al.: ARDSnet ventilatory protocol and alveolar hyperinflation: Role of positive end-expiratory pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 176:761–767
Cornejo RA, Díaz JC, Tobar EA, et al.: Effects of prone positioning on lung protection in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 188:440–448
Pelosi P, Tubiolo D, Mascheroni D, et al.: Effects of the prone position on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 157:387–393
Lamm WJ, Graham MM, Albert RK: Mechanism by which the prone position improves oxygenation in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150:184–193
Richter T, Bellani G, Scott Harris R, et al.: Effect of prone position on regional shunt, aeration, and perfusion in experimental acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 172:480–487
Spinelli E, Kircher M, Stender B, et al.: Unmatched ventilation and perfusion measured by electrical impedance tomography predicts the outcome of ARDS. Crit Care. 2021; 25:192
Scaramuzzo G, Gamberini L, Tonetti T, et al.; ICU-RER COVID-19 Collaboration: Sustained oxygenation improvement after first prone positioning is associated with liberation from mechanical ventilation and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2021; 11:63
Lai C, Adda I, Teboul JL, et al.: Effects of prone positioning on venous return in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49:781–789