Bias Associated with Peripheral Non-Invasive Compared to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Healthy Anaesthetised and Standing Horses Using the Bionet BM7Vet.
ABP
Bionet BM7Vet
IBP
NIBP
anaesthesia
horse
Journal
Veterinary sciences
ISSN: 2306-7381
Titre abrégé: Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101680127
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2022
28 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
16
12
2021
revised:
22
01
2022
accepted:
26
01
2022
entrez:
24
2
2022
pubmed:
25
2
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare arterial blood pressure (ABP) measured invasively (IBP) to ABP measured non-invasively (NIBP) via oscillometry in healthy anaesthetised and standing horses using the Bionet BM7Vet. Fourteen horses were anaesthetised for elective procedures (anaesthetised group) and 10 horses were enrolled for standing blood pressure manipulation (standing group). In both groups, IBP and NIBP-corrected to heart level were measured every 3 min using the Bionet BM7Vet. The overall mean difference (bias), standard deviation and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated for paired IBP and NIBP systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) blood pressure measurements. In anaesthetised horses, the NIBP cuff was placed at either the proximal tail base or the metacarpus. Invasive MAP was used to retrospectively characterise measurements into hypotensive (≤70 mm Hg), normotensive (71-110 mm Hg) or hypertensive (≥111 mm Hg) subgroups. In standing horses, the NIBP cuff was placed at the tail base only and invasive MAP was manipulated to achieve hypertension (≥126 mm Hg) and hypotension (≤90 mm Hg) using phenylephrine and acepromazine, respectively. When measuring NIBP at the tail in anaesthetised horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 8/185 occasions and overestimated SAP, MAP and DAP during hypotension and normotension. The biases (lower, upper LOA) for MAP were -11.4 (-33.3, 10.5) and -6.0 (-25.8, 13.8) mm Hg, respectively. Hypertension could not be evaluated. When measuring NIBP at the metacarpus in anaesthetised horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 24/65 occasions and underestimated SAP, MAP and DAP when all ABP subgroups were combined. The bias (lower, upper LOA) for pooled MAP was 3.6 (-44.3, 51.6) mm Hg. When measuring NIBP at the tail in standing horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 64/268 occasions and underestimated SAP, MAP and DAP during hypotension, normotension and hypertension. The biases (lower, upper LOA) for MAP were 16.3 (-10.5, 43.1), 16.6 (-19.5, 52.7) and 30.0 (-8.1, 68.0) mm Hg, respectively. Monitoring NIBP on the Bionet BM7Vet in anaesthetised horses overestimated ABP at the tail and underestimated ABP at the metacarpus. The device inaccurately detected hypotension and should be used cautiously. In standing horses, the Bionet BM7Vet underestimated ABP at the tail, especially during pharmacologically induced hypertension.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35202305
pii: vetsci9020052
doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020052
pmc: PMC8878245
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1204-10
pubmed: 18829231
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 May;44(3):492-501
pubmed: 28528758
Am J Vet Res. 2020 Aug;81(8):635-641
pubmed: 32701000
J Vet Intern Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;19(4):571-6
pubmed: 16095176
Am J Vet Res. 2008 Jan;69(1):122-9
pubmed: 18167097
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016 May;43(3):301-8
pubmed: 26313264
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2007 Jan;34(1):23-30
pubmed: 17238959
Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2004 Apr;20(1):11-39
pubmed: 15062457
Equine Vet J. 1993 Mar;25(2):147-51
pubmed: 8467775
Res Vet Sci. 2014 Aug;97(1):111-7
pubmed: 24924217
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015 Jul;42(4):369-76
pubmed: 25082169
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):85-92
pubmed: 26488617
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015 May;42(3):286-91
pubmed: 25053371
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006 Mar;33(2):122-7
pubmed: 16476002
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:1022-1026
pubmed: 27537542
J Vet Intern Med. 2007 May-Jun;21(3):542-58
pubmed: 17552466
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2016 Mar;43(2):199-203
pubmed: 26451748
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 May;30(3):866-72
pubmed: 27059803
Am J Vet Res. 1987 Feb;48(2):192-7
pubmed: 3826855