One-Day Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Pathology by Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy.

biparametric magnetic resonance imaging digital pathology fluorescence confocal microscopy prostate cancer

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 08 12 2021
revised: 10 01 2022
accepted: 18 01 2022
entrez: 25 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2022
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this prospective observational study, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel one-day PCa diagnosis path based on biparametric magnetic resonance (bpMRI) and digital pathology by fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Patients aged 55-70 years scheduled for PBx due to increased PSA levels (3-10 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digitorectal examination were enrolled. All patients underwent bpMRI and PBx with immediate FCM evaluation of biopsy cores. Patients were asked to fill out a dedicated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction rates and concordance between digital pathology and standard HE evaluation were the outcomes of interest. Twelve patients completed our one-day PCa diagnosis path. BpMRI showed suspicious lesions in 7 patients. Digital pathology by FCM identified PCa in 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients. Standard pathology confirmed the diagnosis made through digital pathology in all the cases. At a per patient level, high concordance between the methods was achieved in Gleason Grading (4 out of 5 patients). The level of agreement in the number of positive cores was lower but did not affect the choice of treatment in any of the 5 PCa cases. At a per core level, the agreement was very high for the diagnosis of anyPCa (96.2%) and csPCa (97.3%), with a k coefficient of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively (near perfect agreement). In conclusion, one-day PCa diagnosis by FCM represents a feasible, reliable, and fast diagnostic method that provides significant advantages in optimizing time and resources, leading to patients having a higher quality standard of care perception.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35204368
pii: diagnostics12020277
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020277
pmc: PMC8871204
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):574-581
pubmed: 31167748
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Oct;46(4):1089-1095
pubmed: 28165653
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;51(5):1556-1567
pubmed: 31750988
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):971-979
pubmed: 32972896
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):596-611
pubmed: 33219368
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):784-791
pubmed: 32952095
Urology. 2016 May;91:12-8
pubmed: 26850815
J Public Health Res. 2020 Jun 04;9(1):1778
pubmed: 32550222
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May;41(5):1394-404
pubmed: 24956412
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;13(17):
pubmed: 34503192
Cancer Inform. 2019 Mar 13;18:1176935119835522
pubmed: 30890858
BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1776-80
pubmed: 21999406
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 16;8:438
pubmed: 30386737
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2551
pubmed: 26886598
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;13(7):
pubmed: 33807333
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Aug;44(8):e87-e99
pubmed: 32459716
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928
pubmed: 32130814
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):395-402
pubmed: 33570542
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):341-6
pubmed: 23184141
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2465-2468
pubmed: 32558473
Anticancer Res. 2015 Apr;35(4):2175-82
pubmed: 25862875
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563
pubmed: 32294352
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;9(4):
pubmed: 31835700
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e024941
pubmed: 30361408
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):197-203
pubmed: 29778349
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1254-1259
pubmed: 32912840
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):855-862
pubmed: 33893066
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017

Auteurs

Ugo Giovanni Falagario (UG)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Oscar Selvaggio (O)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Francesca Sanguedolce (F)

Department of Pathology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Paola Milillo (P)

Department of Radiology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi (MC)

Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy.

Salvatore Mariano Bruno (SM)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Marco Recchia (M)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Carlo Bettocchi (C)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Gian Maria Busetto (GM)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Luca Macarini (L)

Department of Radiology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Bernardo Rocco (B)

Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milano, Italy.

Luigi Cormio (L)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Department of Urology, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, 76123 Andria, Italy.

Giuseppe Carrieri (G)

Department of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH