One-Day Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Digital Pathology by Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy.
biparametric magnetic resonance imaging
digital pathology
fluorescence confocal microscopy
prostate cancer
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jan 2022
21 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
revised:
10
01
2022
accepted:
18
01
2022
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In this prospective observational study, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of a novel one-day PCa diagnosis path based on biparametric magnetic resonance (bpMRI) and digital pathology by fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM). Patients aged 55-70 years scheduled for PBx due to increased PSA levels (3-10 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digitorectal examination were enrolled. All patients underwent bpMRI and PBx with immediate FCM evaluation of biopsy cores. Patients were asked to fill out a dedicated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Patients' satisfaction rates and concordance between digital pathology and standard HE evaluation were the outcomes of interest. Twelve patients completed our one-day PCa diagnosis path. BpMRI showed suspicious lesions in 7 patients. Digital pathology by FCM identified PCa in 5 (41.7%) of the 12 patients. Standard pathology confirmed the diagnosis made through digital pathology in all the cases. At a per patient level, high concordance between the methods was achieved in Gleason Grading (4 out of 5 patients). The level of agreement in the number of positive cores was lower but did not affect the choice of treatment in any of the 5 PCa cases. At a per core level, the agreement was very high for the diagnosis of anyPCa (96.2%) and csPCa (97.3%), with a k coefficient of 0.90 and 0.92, respectively (near perfect agreement). In conclusion, one-day PCa diagnosis by FCM represents a feasible, reliable, and fast diagnostic method that provides significant advantages in optimizing time and resources, leading to patients having a higher quality standard of care perception.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35204368
pii: diagnostics12020277
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020277
pmc: PMC8871204
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):574-581
pubmed: 31167748
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Oct;46(4):1089-1095
pubmed: 28165653
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 May;51(5):1556-1567
pubmed: 31750988
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):971-979
pubmed: 32972896
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):596-611
pubmed: 33219368
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):784-791
pubmed: 32952095
Urology. 2016 May;91:12-8
pubmed: 26850815
J Public Health Res. 2020 Jun 04;9(1):1778
pubmed: 32550222
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May;41(5):1394-404
pubmed: 24956412
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;13(17):
pubmed: 34503192
Cancer Inform. 2019 Mar 13;18:1176935119835522
pubmed: 30890858
BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1776-80
pubmed: 21999406
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 16;8:438
pubmed: 30386737
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(7):e2551
pubmed: 26886598
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;13(7):
pubmed: 33807333
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Aug;44(8):e87-e99
pubmed: 32459716
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928
pubmed: 32130814
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):395-402
pubmed: 33570542
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):341-6
pubmed: 23184141
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 18;382(25):2465-2468
pubmed: 32558473
Anticancer Res. 2015 Apr;35(4):2175-82
pubmed: 25862875
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563
pubmed: 32294352
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;9(4):
pubmed: 31835700
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e024941
pubmed: 30361408
Eur Urol. 2018 Aug;74(2):197-203
pubmed: 29778349
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1254-1259
pubmed: 32912840
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):855-862
pubmed: 33893066
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017