Detection of Splenic Tissue Using

RBC accessory spleen peritoneal carcinomatosis selective spleen scintigraphy splenosis splenule

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 01 02 2022
revised: 11 02 2022
accepted: 12 02 2022
entrez: 25 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2022
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Red blood cells (RBC) scintigraphy can be used not only for detection of bleeding sites, but also of spleen tissue. However, there is no established quantitative readout. Therefore, we investigated uptake in suspected splenic lesions in direct quantitative correlation to sites of physiologic uptake in order to objectify the readout. 20 patients with Tc-99m-labelled RBC scintigraphy and SPECT/low-dose CT for assessment of suspected splenic tissue were included. Lesions were rated as vital splenic or non-splenic tissue, and uptake and physiologic uptake of bone marrow, pancreas, and spleen were then quantified using a volume-of-interest based approach. Hepatic uptake served as a reference. The median uptake ratio was significantly higher in splenic (2.82 (range, 0.58-24.10), As the uptake in extra-splenic regions is invariably low compared to splenules, it can be used as comparator for evaluating suspected splenic tissues.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Red blood cells (RBC) scintigraphy can be used not only for detection of bleeding sites, but also of spleen tissue. However, there is no established quantitative readout. Therefore, we investigated uptake in suspected splenic lesions in direct quantitative correlation to sites of physiologic uptake in order to objectify the readout.
METHODS METHODS
20 patients with Tc-99m-labelled RBC scintigraphy and SPECT/low-dose CT for assessment of suspected splenic tissue were included. Lesions were rated as vital splenic or non-splenic tissue, and uptake and physiologic uptake of bone marrow, pancreas, and spleen were then quantified using a volume-of-interest based approach. Hepatic uptake served as a reference.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median uptake ratio was significantly higher in splenic (2.82 (range, 0.58-24.10),
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
As the uptake in extra-splenic regions is invariably low compared to splenules, it can be used as comparator for evaluating suspected splenic tissues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35204576
pii: diagnostics12020486
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020486
pmc: PMC8871479
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Nucl Med. 1991 Dec;32(12):2286-7
pubmed: 1744718
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 06;91(4):e2020098
pubmed: 33525300
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 7;19(41):6979-94
pubmed: 24222942
J Nucl Med. 2014 Jun;55(6):967-75
pubmed: 24744445
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4388-4398
pubmed: 29773661
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):493-6
pubmed: 12540458
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(9):e586
pubmed: 25738479
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jun;41(6):1123-32
pubmed: 24562647
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;50(2):229-235
pubmed: 32540140
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2015 Feb 5;24(1):1-7
pubmed: 25800591
J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct;62(10):1380-1383
pubmed: 33547210
Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;42(12):e504-e505
pubmed: 29076911
Clin Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;28(2):121-3
pubmed: 12544129
Clin Nucl Med. 2006 Aug;31(8):463-6
pubmed: 16855431
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2019 Mar 19;28(1):38-40
pubmed: 30942062
Acta Radiol Open. 2018 May 11;7(5):2058460118772324
pubmed: 29780616
World J Hepatol. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):773-779
pubmed: 31966909
Clin Radiol. 1994 Feb;49(2):115-7
pubmed: 8124888
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Nov;43(11):3054-3059
pubmed: 29651643
J Nucl Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):1114-6
pubmed: 9627356

Auteurs

Adrien Holzgreve (A)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Friederike Völter (F)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Astrid Delker (A)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Wolfgang G Kunz (WG)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Matthias P Fabritius (MP)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Matthias Brendel (M)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Nathalie L Albert (NL)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Peter Bartenstein (P)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Marcus Unterrainer (M)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Lena M Unterrainer (LM)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Classifications MeSH