Immunogenicity and safety of an intradermal fractional third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 vaccine compared with those of a standard intramuscular third dose in volunteers who previously received two doses of CoronaVac: A randomized controlled trial.
AZD1222
Boost
COVID-19
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
Fractional dose
Immunogenicity
Intradermal route
SARS-CoV-2
Safety
Third dose
Journal
Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 03 2022
15 03 2022
Historique:
received:
23
09
2021
revised:
30
01
2022
accepted:
02
02
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
25
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The CoronaVac vaccine is widely used in Thailand to combat the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The limited immunogenicity of this vaccine is a concern, especially because of expanding delta variant outbreaks. A third boost may enhance antiviral immune responses. This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of an intradermal (ID) fractional third dose of AZD1222 vaccine compared with those of a standard intramuscular (IM) third dose. Participants were enrolled from August 9, 2021 to August 13, 2021 at Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. The eligibility criteria were age 18 years or older and prior two-dose Coronavac vaccination completed at least 2 months previously. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups by block randomization: (i) standard dose by IM administration (IM), (ii) 20% of the standard dose ID (ID1), or (iii) 40% of the standard dose ID (ID2). The primary endpoint was the geometric mean ratio of anti-receptor binding domain antibody in the ID1/ID2 vs. the IM groups 14 days post-vaccination. A total of 125 participants were randomized (IM, n = 41; ID1, n = 41; and ID2, n = 43). One participant was lost to follow-up by day 14 post-vaccination in the ID1 group. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) of anti-receptor binding domain antibody was 0.94 (0.80-1.09) in the ID1 group and 1.28 (0.95-1.74) in the ID2 group. Immunogenicity in both ID groups met the non-inferiority criteria. Local adverse events were more common in the ID groups than in the IM group but were mostly mild to moderate in severity. An ID fractional third dose of AZD1222 was non-inferior to a standard IM third dose among individuals previously vaccinated with CoronaVac. Adverse events associated with the ID fractional third dose included mild to moderate local site reactions. This vaccination strategy may help conserve vaccine supply.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35210118
pii: S0264-410X(22)00143-8
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.019
pmc: PMC8860330
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1761-1767Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021 Dec;10(1):629-637
pubmed: 33691606
Vaccine. 2018 Sep 5;36(37):5500-5503
pubmed: 30107991
BMJ. 2021 Aug 16;374:n1980
pubmed: 34400478
J Clin Virol. 2021 Jun;139:104820
pubmed: 33865031
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):661-662
pubmed: 34161700
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1347-1348
pubmed: 33770519
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Aug;21(8):475-484
pubmed: 34211186
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 18;5:16756
pubmed: 26576856
J Immunol. 2006 Aug 15;177(4):2208-15
pubmed: 16887980
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Feb;42:100432
pubmed: 34974335
Annu Rev Immunol. 2017 Apr 26;35:469-499
pubmed: 28226228
Transfusion. 2021 Dec;61(12):3455-3467
pubmed: 34674284
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Oct;21(10):1352-1354
pubmed: 34454652
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511
pubmed: 33264556
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 15;385(3):239-250
pubmed: 34043894
Cell. 2021 Feb 18;184(4):861-880
pubmed: 33497610
Vaccine. 2011 Aug 5;29(34):5666-74
pubmed: 21699951
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035693
pubmed: 33560425
Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):213-222
pubmed: 34246358
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2012;351:77-112
pubmed: 21472533
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Sep;38(9):1073-1078
pubmed: 32704169
J Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;216(suppl_1):S161-S167
pubmed: 28838185
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40385
pubmed: 22808149
Cell Mol Immunol. 2018 Mar;15(3):206-215
pubmed: 29151578
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Oct 12;4(10):e845
pubmed: 20967288
Vaccines (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;8(3):
pubmed: 32947966
J Virol. 2005 Oct;79(19):12125-31
pubmed: 16160140
BMJ. 2021 Aug 25;374:n2062
pubmed: 34433545
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 04;9(9):
pubmed: 34579227
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
Virus Res. 2009 Aug;143(2):184-94
pubmed: 19647886
Cell Rep. 2021 Jul 20;36(3):109400
pubmed: 34245672
Int Immunol. 2019 Jul 13;31(7):423-429
pubmed: 30668771
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jul;2(7):e279-e280
pubmed: 33899038