Correlation of spinopelvic parameters with functional outcomes in surgically managed cases of lumbar spinal tuberculosis- A retrospective study.

Lumbar lordosis Lumbar tuberculosis Pelvic parameters

Journal

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 18 09 2021
revised: 13 01 2022
accepted: 30 01 2022
entrez: 25 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2022
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The advanced stage of vertebral involvement in spinal tuberculosis (STB) can cause vertebral body collapse, which leads to kyphotic deformity and paraplegia in severe cases. Surgery is indicated in patients having disabling back pain, progressive neurological deficit, and instability in spine despite conservative management. The derangement of lumbar parameters, especially the loss of lumbar lordosis has been found to cause functional deterioration in patients. With the current evidences in place, this study was done to evaluate the correlation between the restoration of lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, and functional outcome when posterior only approach was used to manage the lumbar STB. Active Tuberculosis of lumbar vertebra (L1-S1) confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. All the cases scheduled for surgery underwent radiographs, CT scan, and MRI scans. Lumbar lordosis and other pelvic parameters were calculated on X-rays. VAS scores and ODI scores were documented during the follow-up to assess functional well-being. A total of 33 (22 M:11 F) patients were included in the study. The mean lumbar lordosis pre-operatively was -22.84 ± 11.19° which was corrected to -37.03 ± 9.02° (p < 0.05) post-operatively. The pelvic tilt pre-operatively was 25.33 ± 6.75° which was corrected to 19.63 ± 5.84° (p < 0.05) post-operatively. The mean ODI improved from 84.33 ± 11.84 to 26.93 ± 8.74 (p < 0.05) at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score pre-operatively was 8.06 ± 1.27 which improved to 2.45 ± 0.93 (p < 0.05) in the post-operative period. The study found a strong negative correlation between ODI scores and lumbar lordosis and a strong positive correlation between pelvic tilt and ODI scores. But the correlation needs to be further studied and evaluated by a well-constructed study especially with a control group treated conservatively.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The advanced stage of vertebral involvement in spinal tuberculosis (STB) can cause vertebral body collapse, which leads to kyphotic deformity and paraplegia in severe cases. Surgery is indicated in patients having disabling back pain, progressive neurological deficit, and instability in spine despite conservative management. The derangement of lumbar parameters, especially the loss of lumbar lordosis has been found to cause functional deterioration in patients. With the current evidences in place, this study was done to evaluate the correlation between the restoration of lumbar lordosis, pelvic parameters, and functional outcome when posterior only approach was used to manage the lumbar STB.
METHODS METHODS
Active Tuberculosis of lumbar vertebra (L1-S1) confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. All the cases scheduled for surgery underwent radiographs, CT scan, and MRI scans. Lumbar lordosis and other pelvic parameters were calculated on X-rays. VAS scores and ODI scores were documented during the follow-up to assess functional well-being.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 33 (22 M:11 F) patients were included in the study. The mean lumbar lordosis pre-operatively was -22.84 ± 11.19° which was corrected to -37.03 ± 9.02° (p < 0.05) post-operatively. The pelvic tilt pre-operatively was 25.33 ± 6.75° which was corrected to 19.63 ± 5.84° (p < 0.05) post-operatively. The mean ODI improved from 84.33 ± 11.84 to 26.93 ± 8.74 (p < 0.05) at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score pre-operatively was 8.06 ± 1.27 which improved to 2.45 ± 0.93 (p < 0.05) in the post-operative period.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The study found a strong negative correlation between ODI scores and lumbar lordosis and a strong positive correlation between pelvic tilt and ODI scores. But the correlation needs to be further studied and evaluated by a well-constructed study especially with a control group treated conservatively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35211375
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101788
pii: S0976-5662(22)00024-8
pmc: PMC8844813
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101788

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Jul;6(4):324-330
pubmed: 30175181
Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Sep;8(3):268-73
pubmed: 27583109
Injury. 2015 Jul;46(7):1311-6
pubmed: 25813732
Spine Deform. 2019 Mar;7(2):356-363
pubmed: 30660233
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2224-31
pubmed: 21102297
Indian J Orthop. 2012 Mar;46(2):159-64
pubmed: 22448053
Eur Spine J. 2000 Feb;9(1):47-55
pubmed: 10766077
Springerplus. 2016 May 13;5:615
pubmed: 27330881
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):E231-E235
pubmed: 31913174
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Oct 15;22(20):2452-7
pubmed: 9355229
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 May;84(4):530-4
pubmed: 12043773
Indian J Orthop. 2012 Mar;46(2):165-70
pubmed: 22448054
Eur Spine J. 2007 Sep;16(9):1459-67
pubmed: 17211522
Asian Spine J. 2016 Aug;10(4):792-800
pubmed: 27559464
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Oct;7(4):387-92
pubmed: 17933311
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978 Dec;3(4):336-42
pubmed: 741240
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 1;38(13):E803-12
pubmed: 23722572
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 1;40(9):642-9
pubmed: 25705962
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):E1193-8
pubmed: 20959772
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jul 15;19(14):1611-8
pubmed: 7939998
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Oct 1;43(19):1355-1362
pubmed: 29077603
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:609-18
pubmed: 21809016
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):59-64
pubmed: 11805637
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Sep 22;10:150
pubmed: 26391477
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 20;:1-8
pubmed: 32197241
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 1;27(21):2328-37
pubmed: 12438980
Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103
pubmed: 9629932
World J Orthop. 2015 Jan 18;6(1):117-26
pubmed: 25621216
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 May;30(4):701-706
pubmed: 31919680
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Aug 15;24(16):1712-20
pubmed: 10472106
J Spinal Disord. 1996 Oct;9(5):392-400
pubmed: 8938607
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9
pubmed: 16166889

Auteurs

Syed Ifthekar (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Gagandeep Yadav (G)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Kaustubh Ahuja (K)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Samarth Mittal (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Sudhakar P Venkata (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Pankaj Kandwal (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

Classifications MeSH