Inverted Y ureteral duplication with an ectopic ureter and multiple urinary calculi: A case report.
Case report
Ectopic ureter
Inverted Y
Ureteral duplication
Urinary calculi
Journal
World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2022
06 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
01
08
2021
revised:
12
11
2021
accepted:
22
12
2021
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
26
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the clinical treatment of diseases related to ureteral duplication, it is very important to make a clear diagnosis before surgery because different types of ureteral duplication correspond to different treatment options. Inverted Y ureteral duplication with ectopic ureters and multiple urinary calculi is clinically rare. This case can help clinicians increase their understanding of this disease and gain some experience in its diagnosis and treatment. A 36-year-old male who was previously healthy presented to the hospital with lumbar pain. Percussion of the right kidney area showed the patient had pain. Computed tomography scans revealed multiple urinary calculi in the right urinary system. Computed tomography urography revealed a duplicated ureteral malformation with an ectopic ureter. A transurethral ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy was performed successfully. Intraoperative retrograde ureterography was performed, and the ectopic ureter was visible. We informed the family of the intraoperative findings and suggested laparoscopic ectopic ureterectomy for the ectopic ureteral stones. Unfortunately, the family temporarily refused laparoscopic surgery. The patient did not feel any discomfort after one year of follow-up. Inverted Y ureteral duplication with an ectopic ureter and multiple urinary calculi is rare. Clinicians must be highly vigilant, make a correct diagnosis before surgery, determine the type of ureteral duplication and the distribution of urinary calculi, and then draw up a reasonable treatment plan to avoid unnecessary complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the clinical treatment of diseases related to ureteral duplication, it is very important to make a clear diagnosis before surgery because different types of ureteral duplication correspond to different treatment options. Inverted Y ureteral duplication with ectopic ureters and multiple urinary calculi is clinically rare. This case can help clinicians increase their understanding of this disease and gain some experience in its diagnosis and treatment.
CASE SUMMARY
METHODS
A 36-year-old male who was previously healthy presented to the hospital with lumbar pain. Percussion of the right kidney area showed the patient had pain. Computed tomography scans revealed multiple urinary calculi in the right urinary system. Computed tomography urography revealed a duplicated ureteral malformation with an ectopic ureter. A transurethral ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy was performed successfully. Intraoperative retrograde ureterography was performed, and the ectopic ureter was visible. We informed the family of the intraoperative findings and suggested laparoscopic ectopic ureterectomy for the ectopic ureteral stones. Unfortunately, the family temporarily refused laparoscopic surgery. The patient did not feel any discomfort after one year of follow-up.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Inverted Y ureteral duplication with an ectopic ureter and multiple urinary calculi is rare. Clinicians must be highly vigilant, make a correct diagnosis before surgery, determine the type of ureteral duplication and the distribution of urinary calculi, and then draw up a reasonable treatment plan to avoid unnecessary complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35211566
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1326
pmc: PMC8855177
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
1326-1332Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Références
J Urol. 1994 Sep;152(3):946-7
pubmed: 8051762
Urology. 2019 May;127:124-126
pubmed: 30822476
Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Jul;24(7):819-23
pubmed: 18463883
J Endourol. 2017 Feb;31(2):129-134
pubmed: 27809568
J Urol. 1972 Mar;107(3):362-4
pubmed: 5010702
J Urol. 1996 Feb;155(2):642
pubmed: 8558683
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Oct;83(10):1713-6
pubmed: 1434277
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1994 May;40(5):423-5
pubmed: 8023765
J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Apr;9(2):e114-6
pubmed: 23140938
Urol Case Rep. 2016 Oct 07;9:58-61
pubmed: 27747162