Imaging presentation of biliary adenofibroma: A case report.

Biliary adenofibroma Case report Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid Magnetic resonance imaging Misdiagnosis

Journal

World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 15 08 2021
revised: 23 11 2021
accepted: 22 12 2021
entrez: 25 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2022
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biliary adenofibroma (BF) is a rare benign epithelial tumor with the possibility of malignant transformation. Its main pathological feature is a well-defined cystic or honeycomb mass. BF has no specific clinical manifestations or laboratory and imaging findings; thus, it is easily misdiagnosed before surgery. This report describes a case in which biliary cystadenoma was misdiagnosed preoperatively and BF was diagnosed postoperatively. The imaging features, particularly the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, were analyzed and summarized. A 68-year-old Chinese man was admitted to our hospital with a 2-mo history of abdominal discomfort. Following admission to our hospital, laboratory examinations showed normal tumor marker concentrations and liver function. Hepatocellular carcinoma was considered after contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination. MRI suggested the possibility of cystadenoma of the bile duct. However, postoperative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of BF. No local recurrence was found 1 mo after surgery. Our objective is to highlight the imaging diagnostic value of BF, especially on an MRI enhanced scan with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Biliary adenofibroma (BF) is a rare benign epithelial tumor with the possibility of malignant transformation. Its main pathological feature is a well-defined cystic or honeycomb mass. BF has no specific clinical manifestations or laboratory and imaging findings; thus, it is easily misdiagnosed before surgery. This report describes a case in which biliary cystadenoma was misdiagnosed preoperatively and BF was diagnosed postoperatively. The imaging features, particularly the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, were analyzed and summarized.
CASE SUMMARY METHODS
A 68-year-old Chinese man was admitted to our hospital with a 2-mo history of abdominal discomfort. Following admission to our hospital, laboratory examinations showed normal tumor marker concentrations and liver function. Hepatocellular carcinoma was considered after contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination. MRI suggested the possibility of cystadenoma of the bile duct. However, postoperative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of BF. No local recurrence was found 1 mo after surgery.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our objective is to highlight the imaging diagnostic value of BF, especially on an MRI enhanced scan with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35211571
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i4.1366
pmc: PMC8855190
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

1366-1372

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Références

Case Reports Hepatol. 2012;2012:793963
pubmed: 25374710
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-188
pubmed: 31433515
BJR Case Rep. 2015 Jul 3;1(2):20150100
pubmed: 30363187
Pathol Res Pract. 2016 May;212(5):468-70
pubmed: 26778388
Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):407-13
pubmed: 15983777
Pathol Int. 2012 Jul;62(7):506-10
pubmed: 22726072
Case Rep Pathol. 2016;2016:8068513
pubmed: 26885426
Patholog Res Int. 2010 Oct 28;2010:504584
pubmed: 21151526
Surg Case Rep. 2019 Jun 24;5(1):104
pubmed: 31236706
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):499-505
pubmed: 28266931
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Dec;7(6):E107-E112
pubmed: 28078134
Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Feb;17(2):186-92
pubmed: 8422113
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997 Feb;93(2):183-4
pubmed: 9078308
ACG Case Rep J. 2018 Oct 17;5:e72
pubmed: 30370311
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):280-1
pubmed: 12076957
Hepatology. 2017 Jan;65(1):380-383
pubmed: 27631648
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 25;74(6):356-361
pubmed: 31870142
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-3
pubmed: 30241218
Int J Hepatol. 2014;2014:805973
pubmed: 24860673

Auteurs

Shao-Peng Li (SP)

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.

Peng Wang (P)

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.

Ke-Xue Deng (KX)

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China. dengkexue-anhui@163.com.

Classifications MeSH