Experimental test of quantum causal influences.


Journal

Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez: 25 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2022
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Since Bell's theorem, it is known that local realism fails to explain quantum phenomena. Bell inequality violations manifestly show the incompatibility of quantum theory with classical notions of cause and effect. As recently found, however, the instrumental scenario-a pivotal tool in causal inference-allows for nonclassicality signatures going beyond this paradigm. If we are not limited to observational data and can intervene in our setup, then we can witness quantum violations of classical bounds on the causal influence among the involved variables even when no Bell-like violation is possible. That is, through interventions, the quantum behavior of a system that would seem classical can be demonstrated. Using a photonic setup-faithfully implementing the instrumental causal structure and switching between observation and intervention run by run-we experimentally witness such a nonclassicality. We also test quantum bounds for the causal influence, showing that they provide a reliable tool for quantum causal modeling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35213223
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm1515
pmc: PMC8880765
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

eabm1515

Références

Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Jun 8;98(23):230501
pubmed: 17677888
Phys Rev Lett. 1993 Mar 29;70(13):1895-1899
pubmed: 10053414
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Jan 8;116(1):010402
pubmed: 26799003
Phys Rev Lett. 2019 Oct 4;123(14):140401
pubmed: 31702202
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 06;6:5766
pubmed: 25562600
Nat Commun. 2020 May 18;11(1):2467
pubmed: 32424194
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Jan 8;116(1):010403
pubmed: 26799004
Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Aug 13;87(7):077902
pubmed: 11497918
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Dec 4;125(23):230401
pubmed: 33337213
Nature. 2010 Apr 15;464(7291):1021-4
pubmed: 20393558
Sci Adv. 2016 Aug 10;2(8):e1600162
pubmed: 27532045
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;29(4):722-9
pubmed: 10922351

Auteurs

Iris Agresti (I)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Davide Poderini (D)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Beatrice Polacchi (B)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Nikolai Miklin (N)

International Centre for Theory of Quantum Technologies (ICTQT), University of Gdansk, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Mariami Gachechiladze (M)

Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.

Alessia Suprano (A)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Emanuele Polino (E)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Giorgio Milani (G)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Gonzalo Carvacho (G)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Rafael Chaves (R)

International Institute of Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, P. O. Box 1613, 59078-970 Natal, Brazil.

Fabio Sciarrino (F)

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy.

Classifications MeSH