Breast cancer-specific mortality in early breast cancer as defined by high-risk clinical and pathologic characteristics.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms, Male
/ drug therapy
Female
Humans
Incidence
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Risk Factors
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
09
08
2021
accepted:
14
02
2022
entrez:
25
2
2022
pubmed:
26
2
2022
medline:
15
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To investigate breast cancer-specific mortality by early breast cancer (EBC; Stages I-IIIC) subtype; incidence of high-risk indicators for recurrence (defined in monarchE trial); and mortality risk difference by those who did/did not meet these criteria. Analyses included patients with initial EBC diagnosis between 2010-2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data (n = 342,149). Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier estimates examined mortality among 228,031 patients, by subtype (hormone receptor [HR]-positive [+], human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 [HER2] negative [-]; triple negative [TNBC]; HR+, HER2+; HR-, HER2+). Incidence and mortality among patients who did/did not meet monarchE clinicopathological high-risk criteria were examined. Among patients with HR+, HER2- EBC, histologic Grade 3 (vs. Grade 1) was the most influential factor on mortality (hazard ratio, 3.61; 95%CI, 3.27, 3.98). Among patients with TNBC, ≥4 ipsilateral axillary positive nodes (vs. node negative) was the most influential factor on mortality (hazard ratio, 3.46; 95%CI, 2.87, 4.17). For patients with HR-, HER2+ or HR+, HER2+ EBC, tumor size ≥5 cm (vs. <1 cm) and ≥4 ipsilateral axillary positive nodes were the most influential factors on mortality. The 60-month mortality rate for the 12% of patients within the HR+, HER2- EBC group meeting monarchE clinicopathological high-risk criteria was 16.5%, versus 7.0% (Stage II-III and node positive) and 2.8% (Stage I or node negative) for those not meeting criteria. The 60-month mortality rate for patients with TNBC was 18.5%. Mortality risk and the relative importance of risk factors varied by subtype. monarchE clinicopathological high-risk criteria were associated with increased mortality risk among patients with HR+, HER2- EBC. Patients with HR+, HER2- EBC, and monarchE clinicopathological high-risk criteria experienced risk of mortality similar to patients with early TNBC. These data highlight a high unmet need in this select patient population who may benefit most from therapy escalation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35213669
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264637
pii: PONE-D-21-25713
pmc: PMC8880870
doi:
Substances chimiques
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0264637Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policy and report the following conflicts: David Nelson and Jacqueline Brown are employees of a commercial company: Eli Lilly and Company. They are also minor shareholders of a commercial company: Eli Lilly and Company. Michael Method is a former employee of a commercial company: Eli Lilly and Company. Michael Method is a current employee of a commercial company: Immunogen. Aki Morikawa is an employee of the University of Michigan. Aki Morikawa reports receiving institutional research funding from the following commercial companies: Eli Lilly and Company, Seattle Genetics, Eisai/H3B, Novartis, Takeda, Pfizer, and Molecular Templates Inc.; she also reports consulting with Eli Lilly and Company and serving on an advisory board for Seattle Genetics. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):465-474
pubmed: 30328050
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;14(10):595-610
pubmed: 28561071
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1341-1352
pubmed: 26211827
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):111-121
pubmed: 29860917
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;53:65-74
pubmed: 26693900
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 1;21(7):1205-13
pubmed: 12663706
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):69-77
pubmed: 29128898
Clin Breast Cancer. 2008 Dec;8 Suppl 4:S157-65
pubmed: 19158036
Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1571-1581
pubmed: 34656740
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):494-503
pubmed: 28404760
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi7-23
pubmed: 23970019
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 13;12(12):
pubmed: 33322174
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2341-9
pubmed: 26926676
Breast. 2016 Oct;29:181-5
pubmed: 27544822
Ann Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;30(10):1541-1557
pubmed: 31373601
Oncology. 2013;84(4):219-25
pubmed: 23364275
Oncologist. 2005;10 Suppl 3:20-9
pubmed: 16368868
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5.5):552-555
pubmed: 31117035
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0245725
pubmed: 33571189
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 4;14(10):e0223325
pubmed: 31584964
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5569-75
pubmed: 18981464
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;38(34):3987-3998
pubmed: 32954927
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr 28;106(5):
pubmed: 24777111