Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services.
adoption
ancestry
direct-to-consumer genetic testing
donor conception
family secrets
misattributed parentage
non-paternity event
relative matching
Journal
American journal of human genetics
ISSN: 1537-6605
Titre abrégé: Am J Hum Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370475
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 03 2022
03 03 2022
Historique:
received:
12
11
2021
accepted:
24
01
2022
pubmed:
27
2
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
entrez:
26
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In recent decades, genetic genealogy has become popular as a result of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Some DTC genetic testing companies offer genetic relative-finder (GRF) services that compare the DNA of consenting participants to identify genetic relatives among them and provide each participant a list of their relative matches. We surveyed a convenience sample of GRF service participants to understand the prevalence of discoveries and associated experiences. Almost half (46%) of the 23,196 respondents had participated in GRF services only for non-specific reasons that included interest in building family trees and general curiosity. However, most (82%) also learned the identity of at least one genetic relative. Separately, most respondents (61%) reported learning something new about themselves or their relatives, including potentially disruptive information such as that a person they believed to be their biological parent is in fact not or that they have a sibling they had not known about. Respondents generally reported that discovering this new information had a neutral or positive impact on their lives, and most had low regret regarding their decision to participate in GRF services. Yet some reported making life changes as a result of their discoveries. Compared to respondents making other types of discoveries, those who learned that they were donor conceived reported the highest decisional regret and represented the largest proportion reporting net-negative consequences for themselves. Our findings indicate that discoveries from GRF services may be common and that the consequences for individuals, while generally positive, can be far-reaching and complex.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35216680
pii: S0002-9297(22)00013-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.01.013
pmc: PMC8948156
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
486-497Subventions
Organisme : NHGRI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HG011268
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests C.J.G. and S.M.F. are members of the Investigative Genetic Genealogy Working Group of the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods. A.L.M. was a founding member of the FamilyTreeDNA Citizen’s Panel. B.K. is founder and owner of Watershed DNA, LLC. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Med Philos. 2007 Jul-Aug;32(4):359-73
pubmed: 17712708
J Community Genet. 2021 Jan;12(1):37-52
pubmed: 32789669
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1135-40
pubmed: 27073260
Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):111-21
pubmed: 25358347
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Apr;20(4):523-32
pubmed: 20129827
N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 10;364(6):524-34
pubmed: 21226570
Med Decis Making. 2016 Aug;36(6):777-90
pubmed: 26975351
Hum Genet. 2012 Jan;131(1):41-56
pubmed: 21698460
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018 Dec;21(4):225-228
pubmed: 28697325
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(1):36-45
pubmed: 28068660
J Med Genet. 2013 Jun;50(6):393-400
pubmed: 23559530
J Genet Couns. 2013 Oct;22(5):565-75
pubmed: 23547022
J Genet Couns. 2021 Feb;30(1):144-157
pubmed: 32602181
Appl Transl Genom. 2016 Feb 01;8:36-9
pubmed: 27047759
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Nov 26;7(11):e23596
pubmed: 33242016
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):281-92
pubmed: 12926578
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):6-20
pubmed: 27704392
PeerJ. 2013 Feb 12;1:e8
pubmed: 23638402
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545
pubmed: 27657683
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 19;164(8):513-22
pubmed: 26928821
J Genet Couns. 2012 Jun;21(3):413-22
pubmed: 22278220
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):495-505
pubmed: 23832288
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Jul 3;105(1):122-131
pubmed: 31204012