Impact of Multiparametric MRI and PSA Density on the Initial Indication or the Maintaining in Active Surveillance During Follow-Up in low-Risk Prostate Cancer.


Journal

Clinical genitourinary cancer
ISSN: 1938-0682
Titre abrégé: Clin Genitourin Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101260955

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 03 07 2021
revised: 12 01 2022
accepted: 17 01 2022
pubmed: 27 2 2022
medline: 31 5 2022
entrez: 26 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A greater selection of candidates for active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) may decrease the rate of delayed treatment. We aimed to study: 1) the impact of MRI and PSA density (PSAd) at baseline on the final status, and 2) the impact of bio-clinical features during the follow-up on pursuing AS. This retrospective, monocentric study between June 2013 and July 2020, included 99 patients in AS (median follow-up: 19 months [18-92]). All MRI were reviewed by a single radiologist. Lost to follow-up were 17 patients and 6 patients chose treatment by themselves. Treatment was proposed in case of upgrading (≥ GG2) or increasing PCa volume. Impact of MRI and PSAd at baseline:  Combining PSAd ≤ 0.15 and PIRADS ≤ 3, the probability to remain in AS was 72%. This rate reached 83% when PSAd ≤ 0.10 was associated to normal MRI.  During follow-up:  One hundred fifty-seven prostatic biopsies (PBx) were performed and 38 (24%) found PCa upgrading. The association between negative MRI and PSAd ≤ 0.10, during follow-up, had an excellent NPV to predict treatment (95%). This combination concerned 25% (37/151) of surveillance biopsies that could have been avoided at the cost of delaying upgrading in 3% (1/37). In multivariate analysis, only PIRADS ≥ 4 before PBx was associated to a risk of treatment during follow-up (OR, 10.4 [95% CI, 4.2-25.8]; P < .0001). Using PSAd and MRI at baseline to select patients showed excellent performances to predict the maintenance in AS. During follow-up, MRI PIRADS ≥ 4 was associated to an increased risk of treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35216924
pii: S1558-7673(22)00027-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.015
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e244-e252

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kevin Saout (K)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France. Electronic address: kevin.saout@yahoo.fr.

Audrey Zambon (A)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Truong An Nguyen (TA)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France; LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Caroline Lucas (C)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Charlotte Payrard-Starck (C)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

Tristan Segalen (T)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Valentin Tissot (V)

Radiology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Laurent Doucet (L)

Pathology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Julien Marolleau (J)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Charles Deruelle (C)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Vincent Joulin (V)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Alexandre Fourcade (A)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France.

Georges Fournier (G)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France; LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France; CeRePP, Paris, France.

Antoine Valeri (A)

Urology Department, CHU, Brest, France; Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France; LaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France; CeRePP, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH