Correlation analysis of the puncture-side bone cement/vertebral body volume ratio and bone cement leakage in the paravertebral vein in vertebroplasty.
Cement leakage in the paravertebral vein
Puncture-side bone cement/vertebral volume ratio
Vertebroplasty
Volume of puncture-side bone cement
Volume of vertebral body
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Feb 2022
26 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
accepted:
14
02
2022
entrez:
27
2
2022
pubmed:
28
2
2022
medline:
3
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore the influencing factors of bone cement leakage in the paravertebral vein after vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and to determine the correlation between the puncture-side bone cement/vertebral body volume ratio and bone cement leakage in the paravertebral vein. This was a retrospective analysis of 495 patients (585 vertebral bodies) with OVCFs treated from August 2018 to May 2021 in our hospital. The patients' postoperative CT data were imported into Mimics software, and the three-dimensional(3D) reconstruction function was used to calculate the bone cement volume (BCV), puncture-side bone cement volume (PSBCV), and vertebral body volume (VBV); the bone cement/vertebral body volume ratio (BCV/VCV%) and puncture-side bone cement/vertebral body volume ratio (PSBCV/VCV%) were additionally calculated. Sex, Age, Body mass index(BMI), Bone density, BCV, PSBCV, VBV, BCV/VCV%, and PSBCV/VCV were compared between the leakage group and the non-leakage group. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the correlations between the factors that statistically significantly differed between the two groups and the presence of leakage in the paravertebral veins. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the diagnostic value of the PSBCV/VCV% and to obtain the optional cut-off value. A total of 102 males and 393 females with an average age of 72.89 (52 ~ 93) years were included in our study. There were 57 cases of cement leakage (59 vertebral bodies) in the paravertebral vein. There were 438 patients (526 vertebral bodies) without paravertebral cement leakage. Univariate analysis showed that the differences in sex, bone density, PSBCV, and PSBCV/VCV% between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that there were correlations between sex, bone density, and PSBCV/VCV% and the presence of paravertebral cement leakage (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of the PSBCV/VCV% for the diagnosis of cement leakage in the paravertebral vein was greater than 0.65, and P < 0.05, indicating a diagnostic value. The best cut-off point for the diagnosis of paravertebral cement leakage with the PSBCV/VCV% was 13.68%, with a sensitivity of 84.7% and specificity of 37.8%. Sex, bone density, and PSBCV/VCV% are risk factors for cement leakage in the paravertebral veins after vertebroplasty for the treatment of OVCFs; the PSBCV/VCV% is strongly associated with paravertebral venous leakage, and the optimal PSBCV/VCV% is 13.68%. When the PSBCV/VCV% exceeds the optimal value, the risk of cement leakage in the paravertebral vein becomes significantly increased.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35219306
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05135-w
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05135-w
pmc: PMC8882274
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
184Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 1;31(17):1983-2001
pubmed: 16924218
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(12):e14941
pubmed: 30896660
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 15;28(14):1513-9; discussion 1519-20
pubmed: 12865836
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Nov;41(11):1391-400
pubmed: 22286549
Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:582769
pubmed: 26221556
Orthop Surg. 2012 Aug;4(3):182-9
pubmed: 22927153
Acta Radiol. 2005 May;46(3):276-9
pubmed: 15981724
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):140
pubmed: 29880007
Eur Spine J. 2001 Apr;10(2):164-71
pubmed: 11345639
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):250-9
pubmed: 19332856
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):153-60
pubmed: 27630477
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e677-e688
pubmed: 29555612
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 May;29(4):E171-6
pubmed: 25469491
Dose Response. 2016 Dec 20;14(4):1559325816682867
pubmed: 28182178
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;28(11):1358-63
pubmed: 25639050
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 30;21(1):792
pubmed: 33256689
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:633-642
pubmed: 28192270
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 29;14(1):406
pubmed: 31783861
J Radiol Case Rep. 2011;5(10):14-21
pubmed: 22470765
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 20;36(12):E761-72
pubmed: 21289575
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Apr;32(4):654-7
pubmed: 21415145
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1747-55
pubmed: 22433500
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2021 May;17(5):302-303
pubmed: 32265158
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):1097-102
pubmed: 15385313
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jul 15;29(14):E294-7
pubmed: 15247590
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e286-e290
pubmed: 32014549
Int Orthop. 2016 Jun;40(6):1205-10
pubmed: 26753843
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Apr;63:48-51
pubmed: 30861473
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Aug;7(16):372
pubmed: 31555686
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jul 11;15(1):259
pubmed: 32653022
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2016 Oct;12(2):128-134
pubmed: 27857921
Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:591432
pubmed: 23738182