Diagnostic Delay and Its Predictors in Cluster Headache.
Korea
cluster headache
delayed diagnosis
headache
primary headache disorder
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
02
12
2021
accepted:
10
01
2022
entrez:
28
2
2022
pubmed:
1
3
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cluster headache (CH) is a rare, primary headache disorder, characterized of excruciating, strictly one-sided pain attacks and ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. Given the debilitating nature of CH, delayed diagnosis can increase the disease burden. Thus, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic delay, its predictors, and clinical influence among patients with CH. Data from a prospective multicenter CH registry over a 4-year period were analyzed. CH was diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 criteria, and diagnostic delay of CH was assessed as the time interval between the year of the first onset and the year of CH diagnosis. Patients were classified into three groups according to the tertiles of diagnostic delay (1st tertile, <1 year; 2nd tertile, 1-6 years; and 3rd tertile, ≥7 years). Overall, 445 patients were evaluated. The mean duration of diagnosis delay was 5.7 ± 6.7 years, (range, 0-36 years). Regarding the age of onset, majority of young patients (age <20 years) belonged to the third tertile (60%), whereas minority of old patients (>40 years) belonged to the third tertile (9.0%). For year of onset, the proportion of patients in the 3rd tertile was the highest for the groups before the publication year of the ICHD-2 (74.7%) and the lowest for the groups after the publication year of the ICHD-3 beta version (0.5%). Compared with the first CH, episodic CH [multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.91, 95% CI = 2.42-14.48], chronic CH (aOR = 8.87, 95% CI = 2.66-29.51), and probable CH (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI = 1.48-11.43) were associated with the tertiles of diagnostic delay. Age of onset (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and PHQ-9 score (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99) were inversely associated with the tertile of diagnostic delay. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was highest in the patients of the third tertile. The mean HIT-6 score increased significantly with the diagnostic delay ( Patients with a younger onset of CH have a higher risk of diagnostic delay. Nevertheless, the rate of delayed diagnosis gradually improved over time and with the publication of the ICHD criteria, supporting the clinical significance of diagnostic clinical criteria and headache education to reduce the disease burden of CH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35222255
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.827734
pmc: PMC8866826
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
827734Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Kim, Chung, Kim, Lee, Chu, Ahn, Bae, Song, Sohn, Oh, Kim, Kim, Park, Chung, Moon, Cho, Seo, Kim, Choi, Park, Chung and Cho.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SJC was involved as a site investigator of multicenter trial sponsored Otsuka Korea, Allergan, Ildong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novartis International AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Hyundaipharm. Co. Ltd., Biohaven Asia Pacific Ltd., H. Lundbeck A/S (Lundbeck), and Parexel Korea Co., Ltd., and received lecture honoraria from Allergan Korea, WhanIn Pharm Co., Ltd., Shinpoong Pharma. Co., Ltd., and SK chemicals in the past 24 months. MC was a site investigator for a multicenter trial sponsored by Otsuka Korea, Novartis International AG, and Eli Lilly and Company. He worked as an advisory member for Teva and has received lecture honoraria from Allergan Korea, Handok-Teva, and Yuyu Pharmaceutical Company in the past 24 months. He received grants from the Yonsei University College of Medicine and the National Research Foundation of Korea (2019R1F1A1053841). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Clin Neurol. 2021 Apr;17(2):229-235
pubmed: 33835743
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 07;12:636888
pubmed: 33897595
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Mar 01;4:18006
pubmed: 29493566
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jun;38(7):1374-1386
pubmed: 28920448
Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):97-103
pubmed: 16061323
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;74(8):1123-5
pubmed: 12876249
J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1059-1066
pubmed: 30120560
J Clin Neurol. 2019 Jan;15(1):90-96
pubmed: 30618222
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 26;14(8):e0221155
pubmed: 31449536
Headache. 2008 May;48(5):691-3
pubmed: 18471112
Acta Neurol Belg. 2009 Mar;109(1):10-7
pubmed: 19402567
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211
pubmed: 29368949
Cephalalgia. 2011 Apr;31(5):628-33
pubmed: 21278239
Headache. 2012 Apr;52(4):600-11
pubmed: 22077836
Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):227-236
pubmed: 33086875
J Headache Pain. 2020 May 29;21(1):58
pubmed: 32471362
Cephalalgia. 2021 Nov;41(13):1298-1309
pubmed: 34148408
Cephalalgia. 2014 Jan 20;34(9):664-670
pubmed: 24445197
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6548
pubmed: 31024044
Cephalalgia. 2020 Jan;40(1):49-56
pubmed: 31291778
Neurology. 2016 Nov 1;87(18):1899-1906
pubmed: 27694264
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Sep 29;24(11):68
pubmed: 32990832
J Headache Pain. 2013 Mar 21;14:27
pubmed: 23574884
J Headache Pain. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):28
pubmed: 33879041
Cephalalgia. 2013 Feb;33(3):182-9
pubmed: 23212294
Cephalalgia. 2019 Jun;39(7):900-907
pubmed: 30857402
Neurol Sci. 2019 Jan;40(1):25-39
pubmed: 30306398
Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808
pubmed: 23771276
J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):88
pubmed: 27670427
Cephalalgia. 2004 Aug;24(8):631-8
pubmed: 15265051
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2018 Apr;21(Suppl 1):S3-S8
pubmed: 29720812