Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 1b Study.
CDK4
CDK6
abemaciclib
endocrine therapy
metastatic breast cancer
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
05
11
2021
accepted:
20
12
2021
entrez:
28
2
2022
pubmed:
1
3
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 regulate G1 to S cell cycle progression and are often altered in cancers. Abemaciclib is a selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 approved for administration on a continuous dosing schedule as monotherapy or as combination therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This Phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) or tamoxifen. Women ≥18 years old with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) MBC were eligible for enrollment. Eligibility included measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable bone disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Adverse events were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and tumor response were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled and received abemaciclib 200 mg every 12 hours in combination with letrozole (Part A, n=20), anastrozole (Part B, n=16), tamoxifen (Part C, n=16), or exemestane (Part D, n=15). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and abdominal pain. Grade 4 TEAEs were reported in five patients (one each with hyperglycemia, hypertension, neutropenia, procedural hemorrhage, and sepsis). There was no effect of abemaciclib or endocrine therapy on the pharmacokinetics of any combination study drug. Across all treated patients, the median progression-free survival was 25.4 months (95% confidence interval: 18.0, 35.8). The objective response rate was 38.9% in 36 patients with measurable disease. Abemaciclib in combination with multiple endocrine therapy options exhibited manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC. https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02057133.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 regulate G1 to S cell cycle progression and are often altered in cancers. Abemaciclib is a selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 approved for administration on a continuous dosing schedule as monotherapy or as combination therapy with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This Phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), including aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) or tamoxifen.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
Women ≥18 years old with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) MBC were eligible for enrollment. Eligibility included measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable bone disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Adverse events were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and tumor response were assessed by RECIST v1.1.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty-seven patients were enrolled and received abemaciclib 200 mg every 12 hours in combination with letrozole (Part A, n=20), anastrozole (Part B, n=16), tamoxifen (Part C, n=16), or exemestane (Part D, n=15). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and abdominal pain. Grade 4 TEAEs were reported in five patients (one each with hyperglycemia, hypertension, neutropenia, procedural hemorrhage, and sepsis). There was no effect of abemaciclib or endocrine therapy on the pharmacokinetics of any combination study drug. Across all treated patients, the median progression-free survival was 25.4 months (95% confidence interval: 18.0, 35.8). The objective response rate was 38.9% in 36 patients with measurable disease.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Abemaciclib in combination with multiple endocrine therapy options exhibited manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02057133.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35223458
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810023
pmc: PMC8868006
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02057133']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
810023Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Tolaney, Beeram, Beck, Conlin, Dees, Puhalla, Rexer, Burris, Jhaveri, Helsten, Becerra, Kalinsky, Moore, Manuel, Lithio, Price, Chapman, Litchfield and Goetz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors AMM, AL, GLP, SCC and LML were employed by Eli Lilly and Company. SMT received research grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cyclacel, Eisai, Eli Lilly (outside submitted work), Exelixis, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Merck, Nektar, Nanostring, Odonate, Pfizer, Puma, Sanofi; and personal fees from 4D Pharma, Athenex, BeyondSpring Pharma, Certara, Chugai Pharma, CytomX, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, G1 Therapeutics, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceuticals, Mersana Therapeutics, OncoPep, OncoSec, OncXerna, Infinity Therapeutics, Samsung Bioepsis Inc., Seattle Genetics, Zentalis, and Zymeworks. MB received honoraria or research funding paid to the institution from Agios, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merrimack, Mersana, Puma Biotechnology, Phoenix Molecular Designs, Zymerworks; Speaker’s Bureau paid to the institution from Bristol-Meyer-Squib, Genentech, and Merck; and travel expenses from Genentech and Merck. Consulting or advisory role payment was paid to an immediate family member from Bayer, Merck, Novartis and Seattle Genetics. ECD acted in a consulting or advisory role for Novartis, Strata Oncology, G1 Therapeutics, received research funding from Novartis, Genentech/Roche, Pfizer, Merck, H3 Biomedicine, Meryx Pharmaceuticals, and received reimbursement for travel expenses from G1 Therapeutics. HAB received research grants paid to the institution from Abbvie, Agios, Arch Oncology, ARMO Biosciences, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BioAtla, BioMed Valley Discoveries, BioTheryX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CALGB, CicloMed, Coordination Pharmaceuticals, CytomX, eFFECTOR Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Gossamer Bio, Lilly, EMD Serono, Roche/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Harpoon, Hengrui Therapeutics, Incyte, Janssen, Jounce, Kymab, MacroGenics, MedImmune, Merck, Millennium, Moderna, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Revolution Medicine, Ryvu Therapeutics, SeaGen, Tesaro, TG Therapeutics, Verastem, Vertex, XBiotech, Zymeworks; uncompensated consulting for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, GRAIL, Incyte, Novartis, Vincerx Pharma; and is employed by HCA Healthcare/Sarah Cannon and has Stock ownership with HCA Healthcare/Sarah Cannon. MPG received research grants paid to the institution: Biovica, Context Pharm, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Sermonix; grants to the institution from Eli Lilly and Pfizer; and personal feed from Genentech Health. KNM served on advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, Aravive, Alkemeres, Blueprint Pharma, Eisai/Serono, Genentech/Roche, GSK/Tesoro, Hengrui, Immunogen, Inxmed, IMab, Lilly, Mereo, Merck, Mersana, Myriad, Novartis, Onconova, OncXerna, Tarveda, vBL Therapeutics. I am on SC for Genentech/Roche, Immunogen, Mersana and VBL Therapeutics. KK acted in a consulting or advisory role for 4D Pharma, AstraZeneca, Cyclocel, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, Oncosec, Pfizer, Puma, and Seattle Genetics; and spouse has stock for Array BioPharma, Grail, and Pfizer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Eli Lilly and Company. The funder had the following involvement with the study: at the time of the study AMM, AL, GLP, LML, and SCC were employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company.
Références
Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(3):181-190.e2
pubmed: 33148479
Cancer Discov. 2016 Apr;6(4):353-67
pubmed: 26658964
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;12(6):523-536
pubmed: 31008668
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646
pubmed: 28968163
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 May;17(5):897-907
pubmed: 29483214
Drug Metab Dispos. 2020 Sep;48(9):796-803
pubmed: 32581049
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):116-124
pubmed: 31563959
Cancer Discov. 2016 Jul;6(7):740-53
pubmed: 27217383
Invest New Drugs. 2014 Oct;32(5):825-37
pubmed: 24919854
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Jan;9(1 Pt 2):468S-72S
pubmed: 12538502
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019 Jan 17;5:5
pubmed: 30675515
Oncotarget. 2017 May 10;8(41):69493-69507
pubmed: 29050219
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Apr 24;10(1):97
pubmed: 28438180
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5218-5224
pubmed: 28533223
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018 Jul 17;10:1758835918786451
pubmed: 30038670
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884
pubmed: 28580882