Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.
DNLR
PCR
breast cancer
immunology
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
02
12
2021
accepted:
24
12
2021
entrez:
28
2
2022
pubmed:
1
3
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) is a biomarker associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer (BC). We analyzed the association of dNLR with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). This is a retrospective analysis of two randomized studies involving early stage/locally advanced TNBC patients receiving anthracycline/taxane-based CT+/-carboplatin (GEICAM/2006-03) or nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel followed by anthracycline regimen (ETNA). dNLR was calculated as the ratio of neutrophils to the difference between total leukocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood before CT (baseline) and at the end of treatment (EOT). Logistic regression analyses were used to explore dNLR association with pCR. In total, 308 TNBC patients were analyzed, 216 from ETNA and 92 from GEICAM/2006-03. Baseline median dNLR was 1.61 (interquartile range (IQR): 1.25-2.04) and at EOT 1.53 (IQR: 0.96-2.22). Baseline dNLR showed positive correlation with increased tumor size ( High baseline and EOT dNLR correlates with lower benefit from neoadjuvant CT in TNBC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) is a biomarker associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer (BC). We analyzed the association of dNLR with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT).
METHODS
METHODS
This is a retrospective analysis of two randomized studies involving early stage/locally advanced TNBC patients receiving anthracycline/taxane-based CT+/-carboplatin (GEICAM/2006-03) or nab-paclitaxel/paclitaxel followed by anthracycline regimen (ETNA). dNLR was calculated as the ratio of neutrophils to the difference between total leukocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood before CT (baseline) and at the end of treatment (EOT). Logistic regression analyses were used to explore dNLR association with pCR.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 308 TNBC patients were analyzed, 216 from ETNA and 92 from GEICAM/2006-03. Baseline median dNLR was 1.61 (interquartile range (IQR): 1.25-2.04) and at EOT 1.53 (IQR: 0.96-2.22). Baseline dNLR showed positive correlation with increased tumor size (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
High baseline and EOT dNLR correlates with lower benefit from neoadjuvant CT in TNBC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35223459
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.827625
pmc: PMC8875201
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
827625Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Ocaña, Chacón, Calvo, Antón, Mansutti, Albanell, Martínez, Lahuerta, Bisagni, Bermejo, Semiglazov, Thill, Chan, Morales, Herranz, Tusquets, Chiesa, Caballero, Valagussa, Bianchini, Alba and Gianni.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AO is currently an employee of Symphogen, Denmark. MM has received honoraria from Pierre Fabre and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eisai, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Roche. He has received advisory board honoraria from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Gentili, MSD Italia, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. JA has received advisory board honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Merck, Daiichi-Sankyo/Astrazeneca, and Seagen and a speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer. GBia has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Noepharm Israel, Amgen, MSD, Chugai, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead, Seagen, and Exact Science. EA has received advisory board honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS, Genomic Health, and Nanostring and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Celgene, as well as investigation grants from Roche, Pfizer, Sysmex, MSD, and Nanostring. LG has received advisory board honoraria from ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Genomic Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Oncolytics Biotech, Odonate Therapeutics, Onkaido Therapeutics, Roche, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Hexal Sandoz, Seattle Genetics, Synthon, Zymeworks, and Sanofi-Aventis; consultant honoraria for selected programs of Forty Seven (CD47), GENENTA, METIS Precision Medicine, Novartis, Odonate Therapeutics, Revolution Medicines, Synaffix, Zymeworks, Menarini Ricerche, Amgen, and Biomedical Insights; and research support from Zymeworks, Revolution Medicines (his institution). LG is coinventor of “European Patent Application N.12195182.6 and 12196177.5,” titled “PDL-1 expression in anti-HER2 therapy”—Roche (no compensation provided). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15;22(2):337-45
pubmed: 26423797
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 25;382(26):e108
pubmed: 32579835
Ann Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(3):323-336
pubmed: 33307202
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):40-50
pubmed: 29233559
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):302-308
pubmed: 29327055
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):617-628
pubmed: 30516102
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 7;107(4):695-9
pubmed: 22828611
Nat Med. 2019 Mar;25(3):389-402
pubmed: 30842677
Front Immunol. 2019 Dec 18;10:2802
pubmed: 31921107
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul;20(7):e390-e396
pubmed: 31267973
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124
pubmed: 24875653
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(2):487-93
pubmed: 23053638
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Dec;20(12):1548-1556
pubmed: 29766456
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(17):6281-6295
pubmed: 32692484
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;20(1):70-81
pubmed: 24532163
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 Aug 17;12:1758835920940928
pubmed: 32874208
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):203-213
pubmed: 31804894
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804
pubmed: 22508812
Tumour Biol. 2016 Jan;37(1):361-8
pubmed: 26219894
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 May;18(5):297-312
pubmed: 33473219
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 15;26(12):2838-2848
pubmed: 32046998
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72
pubmed: 24529560
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355
pubmed: 29567705
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-2159
pubmed: 28564564
JAMA. 2021 Jan 5;325(1):50-58
pubmed: 33300950
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1275-81
pubmed: 18250347