A new in vitro method to predict in vivo photoprotection of skin hyperpigmentation induced by visible light.


Journal

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
ISSN: 1468-3083
Titre abrégé: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9216037

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
revised: 05 01 2022
received: 08 11 2021
accepted: 04 02 2022
pubmed: 1 3 2022
medline: 14 5 2022
entrez: 28 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ultraviolet radiation is the main cause of skin pigmentation, but more recently visible light has been shown to be an important contributor especially in melano-competent subjects. Photoprotection from visible light can improve several hyperpigmentation disorders. Recently, a visible light photoprotection assessment method has been proposed based on in vivo pigmentation; the visible light photoprotection factor (VL-PF) is determined by assessment of the change in colorimetry parameter ITA over several days measured using a chromameter. Although in vivo methods remain the most representative of real life, in vitro methods are more suited to screening sunscreen formulations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between in vivo and in vitro methods in assessing protection against visible light induced pigmentation. We first analysed the in vitro protective properties of the 10 commercially available sunscreens using transmission measurements in the visible spectrum. Then, we performed a monocentric, double-blind, randomized controlled study with intra-individual comparisons in 20 healthy subjects and measure the VL-PF in vivo of those sunscreens. The correlation between the VL-PF and the percentage of blocked light was evaluated using the coefficient of determination R A strong significant correlation was demonstrated between in vivo visible light protection factor and in vitro transmittance measurements, with the highest correlation factor at 420 nm and in the spectrum covering from 400 to 469 nm. Transmittance measurements were found to be a good predictive tool to evaluate sunscreen visible light photoprotection efficacy and could be used to select formulations for final in vivo testing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ultraviolet radiation is the main cause of skin pigmentation, but more recently visible light has been shown to be an important contributor especially in melano-competent subjects. Photoprotection from visible light can improve several hyperpigmentation disorders. Recently, a visible light photoprotection assessment method has been proposed based on in vivo pigmentation; the visible light photoprotection factor (VL-PF) is determined by assessment of the change in colorimetry parameter ITA over several days measured using a chromameter. Although in vivo methods remain the most representative of real life, in vitro methods are more suited to screening sunscreen formulations.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between in vivo and in vitro methods in assessing protection against visible light induced pigmentation.
METHODS METHODS
We first analysed the in vitro protective properties of the 10 commercially available sunscreens using transmission measurements in the visible spectrum. Then, we performed a monocentric, double-blind, randomized controlled study with intra-individual comparisons in 20 healthy subjects and measure the VL-PF in vivo of those sunscreens. The correlation between the VL-PF and the percentage of blocked light was evaluated using the coefficient of determination R
RESULTS RESULTS
A strong significant correlation was demonstrated between in vivo visible light protection factor and in vitro transmittance measurements, with the highest correlation factor at 420 nm and in the spectrum covering from 400 to 469 nm.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Transmittance measurements were found to be a good predictive tool to evaluate sunscreen visible light photoprotection efficacy and could be used to select formulations for final in vivo testing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35224781
doi: 10.1111/jdv.18034
pmc: PMC9314032
doi:

Substances chimiques

Sunscreening Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

922-926

Subventions

Organisme : NAOS

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Références

Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2018 Sep;31(5):649-652
pubmed: 29436173
J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Nov;141(11):2569-2576
pubmed: 34112516
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2017 Sep;33(5):260-266
pubmed: 28602025
Int J Cosmet Sci. 2018 Dec;40(6):589-595
pubmed: 30428143
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jan;72(1):189-90.e1
pubmed: 25443629
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Jul;34(4):241-248
pubmed: 29381828
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Aug;130(8):2092-7
pubmed: 20410914
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014 Feb;30(1):35-42
pubmed: 24313385
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014 Sep;27(5):822-6
pubmed: 24888214
J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Jan;138(1):171-178
pubmed: 28842328

Auteurs

L Duteil (L)

Center of Clinical Pharmacology Applied to Dermatology (CPCAD), L'Archet 2 Hospital, Nice, France.

B Cadars (B)

Research and Development Department, NAOS, Lyon, France.

C Queille-Roussel (C)

Center of Clinical Pharmacology Applied to Dermatology (CPCAD), L'Archet 2 Hospital, Nice, France.

I Giraud (I)

Research and Development Department, NAOS Les Laboratoires, Aix-en-Provence, France.

F Drulhon (F)

Research and Development Department, NAOS Les Laboratoires, Aix-en-Provence, France.

C Graizeau (C)

Research and Development Department, NAOS ILS, Aix-en-Provence, France.

A Guyoux (A)

Research and Development Department, NAOS Les Laboratoires, Aix-en-Provence, France.

T Passeron (T)

Department of Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
C3M, INSERM U1065, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH