Neuropsychological assessment in the multicultural memory clinic: Development and feasibility of the TULIPA battery.
Cultural diversity
cultural competency
education
literacy
neurodegenerative disease
Journal
The Clinical neuropsychologist
ISSN: 1744-4144
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuropsychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8806548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
1
3
2022
medline:
7
1
2023
entrez:
28
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neuropsychological assessment of culturally diverse populations is hindered by barriers in language, culture, education, and a lack of suitable tests. Furthermore, individuals from diverse backgrounds are often unfamiliar with being cognitively tested. The aim of this study was to develop a new neuropsychological test battery and study its feasibility in multicultural memory clinics. Composition of the TULIPA battery (Towards a Universal Language: Intervention and Psychodiagnostic Assessment) entailed a literature review and consultation with experts and individuals from diverse backgrounds. Feasibility was investigated by examining administration and completion rates and the frequency of factors complicating neuropsychological assessment in 345 patients from 37 countries visiting four multicultural memory clinics in the Netherlands. The test battery included existing tests such as the Cross-Cultural Dementia screening (CCD), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), tests from the European Cross-Cultural Neuropsychological Test Battery, and newly developed tests. Completion rates for the test battery were generally high (82%-100%), except for CCD Dots subtest B (58%). Although tests of the "core" TULIPA battery were administered often (median: 6 of 7, IQR: 5-7), supplementary tests were administered less frequently (median: 1 of 9; IQR: 0-3). The number of administered tests correlated with disease severity (RUDAS, ρ=.33, adjusted The TULIPA test battery is a promising new battery to assess culturally diverse populations in a feasible way, provided that complicating factors are taken into account. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2022.2043447 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 35225154
doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2043447
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM