Perspectives of Gynecologic Oncologists on Minimally Invasive Surgery During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Turkish Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology (MIJOD) Survey.


Journal

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
ISSN: 2476-762X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 101130625

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 27 10 2021
entrez: 28 2 2022
pubmed: 1 3 2022
medline: 5 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate gynecologic oncologists' trends and attitudes towards the use of Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in active period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Online national survey sent to members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform consisting of six sections and 45 questions between the dates 1-15 June 2020 in Turkey to explore their surgical practice during the pandemic in three hospital types: Education and research hospital/university hospital, state hospital and private Hospital. Participants were gynecologic oncologists who are members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform. Fifty-eight percent of participants canceled all operations except for cancer surgeries and emergent operations. About a quarter of participants (28%) continued to operate laparoscopically and/or robotically. For the evaluation of the suspected adnexial mass (SAM) 64% used laparotomy and only 13 % operated by laparoscopy (L/S). For the management of low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer only fifth of the participants preferred to perform L/S. For endometrial cancer with high-intermediate risk factors more than half of participants preferred complete staging with laparotomy. For advanced stage ovarian cancer, one-fifth of the participants preferred to perform an explorative laparotomy, whilst 15 % preferred diagnostic laparoscopy to triage the patients for either NACT or cytoreductive surgery. On the contrary 41 % of participants chose to have cytology by paracentesis for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecologic oncologists with >10 years L/S experience used MIS more for SAM. Furthermore, experienced surgeons used L/S more for endometrial cancer patients. In busy COVID hospitals, more participants preferred laparotomy over L/S. Use of MIS decreased during the pandemic in Turkey. More experienced surgeons continued to perform MIS. Surgical treatment was the preferred approach for SAM, early-stage endometrial cancer.  However, NACT was more popular compared to radical surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To evaluate gynecologic oncologists' trends and attitudes towards the use of Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in active period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey.
METHODS METHODS
Online national survey sent to members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform consisting of six sections and 45 questions between the dates 1-15 June 2020 in Turkey to explore their surgical practice during the pandemic in three hospital types: Education and research hospital/university hospital, state hospital and private Hospital. Participants were gynecologic oncologists who are members of Turkish Endoscopy Platform.
RESULTS RESULTS
Fifty-eight percent of participants canceled all operations except for cancer surgeries and emergent operations. About a quarter of participants (28%) continued to operate laparoscopically and/or robotically. For the evaluation of the suspected adnexial mass (SAM) 64% used laparotomy and only 13 % operated by laparoscopy (L/S). For the management of low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer only fifth of the participants preferred to perform L/S. For endometrial cancer with high-intermediate risk factors more than half of participants preferred complete staging with laparotomy. For advanced stage ovarian cancer, one-fifth of the participants preferred to perform an explorative laparotomy, whilst 15 % preferred diagnostic laparoscopy to triage the patients for either NACT or cytoreductive surgery. On the contrary 41 % of participants chose to have cytology by paracentesis for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Gynecologic oncologists with >10 years L/S experience used MIS more for SAM. Furthermore, experienced surgeons used L/S more for endometrial cancer patients. In busy COVID hospitals, more participants preferred laparotomy over L/S.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Use of MIS decreased during the pandemic in Turkey. More experienced surgeons continued to perform MIS. Surgical treatment was the preferred approach for SAM, early-stage endometrial cancer.  However, NACT was more popular compared to radical surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35225470
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.573
pmc: PMC9272609
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

573-581

Références

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Oct;151(1):33-38
pubmed: 32623717
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5337-42
pubmed: 19805678
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3298-3305
pubmed: 32458289
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 05;21:100331
pubmed: 32292899
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 10;27(32):5331-6
pubmed: 19805679
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun;49(6):101729
pubmed: 32247066
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 18;50(SI-1):489-494
pubmed: 32304192
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Oct;231(4):490-496
pubmed: 32673759
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jun;88(6):715-718
pubmed: 32282750
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):256-261
pubmed: 32482336
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1424-1433
pubmed: 32576608
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1108-1112
pubmed: 32641394
J Oncol. 2019 Jul 29;2019:3415630
pubmed: 31467535
Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):785-787
pubmed: 32191340
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1101-1107
pubmed: 32513664
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):e240-e242
pubmed: 33759843
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun 1;146(6):579-584
pubmed: 32232423
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):157-160
pubmed: 32191675
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):236-243
pubmed: 32532460
J Nucl Med. 2020 Sep;61(9):1278-1283
pubmed: 32709733
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1250-1261
pubmed: 32350857
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jul;30(7):1005-1011
pubmed: 32474451

Auteurs

Nasuh Utku Dogan (NU)

Department of Gynecology, Akdeniz University Hospital, 07070, Antalya, Turkey.

Esra Bilir (E)

Department of Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, 34010, Zeytinburnu/Istanbul, Turkey.

Salih Taskin (S)

Department of Gynecology, Ankara University Hospital, 06100, Mamak/ Ankara, Turkey.

Dogan Vatansever (D)

Department of Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, 34010, Zeytinburnu/Istanbul, Turkey.

Selen Dogan (S)

Department of Gynecology, Akdeniz University Hospital, 07070, Antalya, Turkey.

Cagatay Taskiran (C)

Department of Gynecology, Koc University Hospital, 34010, Zeytinburnu/Istanbul, Turkey.

Husnü Celik (H)

Department of Gynecology, Baskent University Adana Hospital, 01250, Yuregir/Adana, Turkey.

Firat Ortac (F)

Department of Gynecology, Ankara University Hospital, 06100, Mamak/ Ankara, Turkey.

Mete Gungor (M)

Department of Gynecology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, 34457, Maslak/Istanbul, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH