The Posterior Septal Nasal Floor Mucosal Flap for Cranial Base Reconstruction.


Journal

The Laryngoscope
ISSN: 1531-4995
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8607378

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
revised: 26 01 2022
received: 05 12 2021
accepted: 13 02 2022
pubmed: 1 3 2022
medline: 9 7 2022
entrez: 28 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

While pedicled intranasal flaps, such as the nasoseptal flap (NSF), successfully reduce postoperative CSF leaks following endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the skull base, morbidity remains prevalent. This study describes the first cadaveric description and radiographic analysis of the posterior septal nasal floor mucosal flap (PSNF) designed to reduce pedicled nasal flap morbidity. A case series is also detailed. Cadaveric dissection, radiographic analysis, and case series. Seven cadaver specimens underwent harvest of the PSNF. PSNF flap dimensions were measured on the thirty deidentified sinus computed tomography (CT) scans. A retrospective case series was performed on the first set of patients who received the PSNF for reconstruction of a sellar base defect. Information concerning complications, symptoms, and the appearance of the flap was recorded from records of the patient's postoperative inpatient stay, 1-week postop visit, and 1-month postop visit. Cadaver dissection of the PSNF flap demonstrated good arc rotation along its pedicle with ability to cover both sellar and planum defects. Cadaveric flap measurements and CT-derived measurements estimated a mean surface area of 16.7 and 18.3 cm The PSNF flap provides a sizeable pedicled region for reconstruction comparable to other pedicled nasal flaps. Our case series demonstrated good postoperative outcomes without reduced donor site morbidity. 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1561-1568, 2022.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35226356
doi: 10.1002/lary.30079
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1561-1568

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Références

Patel MR, Stadler ME, Snyderman CH, et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base 2010;20:397-404.
Eloy JA, Choudhry OJ, Shukla PA, Kuperan AB, Friedel ME, Liu JK. Nasoseptal flap repair after endoscopic transsellar versus expanded endonasal approaches: is there an increased risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak? Laryngoscope 2012;122:1219-1225.
Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1882-1886.
Pinheiro-Neto CD, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL, et al. Improving the design of the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction: a radioanatomic study. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1560-1569.
Peris-Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto C, Funaki T, et al. The extended Nasoseptal flap for Skull Base reconstruction of the Clival region: an anatomical and radiological study. J Neurol Surg B 2013;74:369-385.
Shastri KS, Leonel LCPC, Patel V, et al. Lengthening the nasoseptal flap pedicle with extended dissection into the pterygopalatine fossa. Laryngoscope 2020;130:18-24.
Soudry E, Psaltis AJ, Lee KH, Vaezafshar R, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Complications associated with the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2015;125:80-85.
Rowan NR, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH. Nasal deformities following Nasoseptal flap reconstruction of Skull Base defects. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016;77:14-18.
Ruffner R, Pereira MC, Patel V, Peris-Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto CD. Inferior meatus mucosal flap for septal reconstruction and resurfacing after Nasoseptal flap harvest. Laryngoscope 2021;131:952-955.
Caicedo-Granados E, Carrau R, Snyderman CH, et al. Reverse rotation flap for reconstruction of donor site after vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in skull base surgery: reverse rotation flap for reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1550-1552.
Kimple AJ, Leight WD, Wheless SA, Zanation AM. Reducing nasal morbidity after skull base reconstruction with the nasoseptal flap: free middle turbinate mucosal grafts. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1920-1924.
Nayak JV, Rathor A, Grayson JW, et al. Porcine small intestine submucosal grafts improve remucosalization and progenitor cell recruitment to sites of upper airway tissue remodeling. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8:1162-1168.
Shukla A, Ahmed OG, Orlov CP, et al. Quality-of-life instruments in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery-a practical systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021;11:1264-1268.
Yin LX, Low CM, Puccinelli CL, et al. Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic skull base surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2019;129:1998-2007.
Hura N, Orlov CP, Khalafallah AM, Mukherjee D, Rowan NR. Impact of routine endoscopic skull base surgery on subjective olfaction and gustation outcomes. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021;21:137-142.
Scagnelli RJ, Patel V, Peris-Celda M, Kenning TJ, Pinheiro-Neto CD. Implementation of free mucosal graft technique for sellar reconstruction after pituitary surgery: outcomes of 158 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg 2019;122:e506-e511.
Peris-Celda M, Chaskes M, Lee DD, Kenning TJ, Pinheiro-Neto CD. Optimizing sellar reconstruction after pituitary surgery with free mucosal graft: results from the first 50 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg 2017;101:180-185.
González-García J, Moreno-Luna R, Palacios-García J, et al. Radioanatomical study of the extended free nasal floor mucosal graft and its clinical applications. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020;5:1011-1018.
Daraei P, Oyesiku NM, Patel ZM. The nasal floor pedicled flap: a novel technique for use in skull base reconstruction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:937-943.
Murakami D, Kuga D, Miyamoto Y, et al. A pedicled posterior septal-nasal floor flap and a novel rescue flap for skull base reconstruction. World Neurosurg 2021;150:197-204.e1.
Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gehring DG, Beebe C. Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application. J Digit Imaging 1998;11:137-141.
Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:447-454.
Lund V, Kennedy D. Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:S35-S40.
Pinheiro-Neto CD, Snyderman CH. Nasoseptal flap. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2013;74:42-55.
Lavigne P, Faden DL, Wang EW, Snyderman CH. Complications of nasoseptal flap reconstruction: a systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018;79:S291-S299.
Zhang X, Wang EW, Wei H, et al. Anatomy of the posterior septal artery with surgical implications on the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap. Head Neck 2015;37:1470-1476.
MacArthur FJD, McGarry GW. The arterial supply of the nasal cavity. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:809-815.
Wu P, Li Z, Liu C, Ouyang J, Zhong S. The posterior pedicled inferior turbinate-nasoseptal flap: a potential combined flap for skull base reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 2016;38:187-194.
Choby GW, Pinheiro-Neto CD, de Almeida JR, et al. Extended inferior turbinate flap for endoscopic reconstruction of skull base defects. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014;75:225-230.

Auteurs

Andrew Jay Bowen (AJ)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Ahmed Eltahir (A)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Andrew J Goates (AJ)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Natalia Rezende (N)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Luciano Leonel (L)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Stephen Graepel (S)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Katherine Z Xie (KZ)

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Jamie Van Gompel (J)

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Maria Peris-Celda (M)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Garret Choby (G)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Carlos D Pinheiro-Neto (CD)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH