Liver metastasis in uveal melanoma - treatment options and clinical outcome.

chemotherapy immunotherapy liver metastasis liver-directed therapy molecular characteristic prognosis review uveal melanoma

Journal

Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)
ISSN: 2768-6698
Titre abrégé: Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101612996

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 02 2022
Historique:
received: 25 12 2021
revised: 09 01 2022
accepted: 20 01 2022
entrez: 28 2 2022
pubmed: 1 3 2022
medline: 23 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent primary intraocular malignancy in adults with a stable incidence rate between five and seven cases per million in Europe and the United States. Although UM and melanoma from other sites have the same origin, UM has different epidemiological, biological, pathological and clinical features including characteristic metastatic hepatotropism. Despite improvements in the treatment of primary tumours, approximately 50% of patients with UM will develop metastases. In 90% of cases the liver is the first site of metastasis, however the mechanisms underlying this hepatic tropism have not been elucidated. Metastatic disease is associated with a very poor prognosis with a median overall survival of 6 to 12 months. Currently, there is no standard systemic treatment available for metastatic UM and once liver metastases have developed, prognosis is relatively poor. In order to prolong survival, close follow-up in all patients with UM is recommended for early detection and treatment. The treatment of metastatic UM includes systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy. Liver-directed therapies, such as resection, radioembolization, chemoembolization, immunoembolization, isolated and percutaneous liver perfusion as well as thermal ablation represent available treatment options. However, to date a consensus regarding the optimal method of treatment is still lacking and the importance of setting guidelines in the treatment and management of metastatic UM is becoming a priority. Improvement in knowledge and a better insight into tumour biology, immunology and metastatic mechanism may improve current treatment methods and lead to the development of new strategies paving the way for a personalized approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35227015
pii: S2768-6701(22)00410-5
doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2702072
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

72

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Snježana Kaštelan (S)

School of Medicine Univerity of Zagreb, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Dubrava, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Danijela Mrazovac Zimak (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.

Mira Ivanković (M)

Department of Neurology, General Hospital Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.

Irena Marković (I)

Department of Ophthalmology, Clinical Hospital Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.

Antonela Gverović Antunica (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital Dubrovnik, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH