Genetic-Guided Pharmacotherapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic and Critical Review of Economic Evaluations.


Journal

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
ISSN: 1524-4733
Titre abrégé: Value Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 13 05 2021
revised: 06 08 2021
accepted: 29 09 2021
entrez: 1 3 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 17 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to examine the extent and quality of evidence from economic evaluations (EEs) of genetic-guided pharmacotherapy (PGx) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and to identify variables influential in changing base-case conclusions. From systematic searches, we included EEs of existing PGx testing to guide pharmacotherapy for AF, without restrictions on population characteristics or language. Articles excluded were genetic tests used to guide device-based therapy or focused on animals. We found 18 EEs (46 comparisons), all model-based cost-utility analysis with or without cost-effectiveness analysis mostly from health system's perspectives, of PGx testing to determine coumadin/direct-acting anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing (14 of 18), to stratify patients into coumadin/DOACs (3 of 18), or to increase patients' adherence to coumadin (1 of 18) versus non-PGx. Most PGx to determine coumadin dosing found PGx more costly and more effective than standard or clinical coumadin dosing (19 of 24 comparisons) but less costly and less effective than standard DOAC dosing (14 of 14 comparisons). The remaining comparisons were too few to observe any trend. Of 61 variables influential in changing base-case conclusions, effectiveness of PGx testing was the most common (37%), accounted for in the models using time-based or medication-based approaches or relative risk. The cost of PGx testing has decreased and plateaued over time. EEs to date only partially inform decisions on selecting optimal PGx testing for AF, because most evidence focuses on PGx testing to determine coumadin dosing, but less on other purposes. Future EE may refer to the list of influential variables and the approaches used to account for the effect of PGx testing to inform data collection and study design.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35227459
pii: S1098-3015(21)01754-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticoagulants 0
Factor Xa Inhibitors 0
Warfarin 5Q7ZVV76EI

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

461-472

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M016560/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/14/8/31352
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ahmad Amir Kamil (AA)

School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK.

Ka Keat Lim (KK)

School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, England, UK.

Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova (R)

Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK.

Philip Chowienczyk (P)

National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, England, UK; Cardiovascular Division, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King's College London and St Thomas' Hospital Medical School, London, UK.

Charles D A Wolfe (CDA)

School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, South London, England, UK.

Julia Fox-Rushby (J)

School of Life Course & Population Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, England, UK. Electronic address: julia.fox-rushby@kcl.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH