Design of experiments as a decision tool for cell therapy manufacturing.


Journal

Cytotherapy
ISSN: 1477-2566
Titre abrégé: Cytotherapy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100895309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 12 10 2021
revised: 19 01 2022
accepted: 27 01 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 1 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cell therapies are costlier to manufacture than small molecules and protein therapeutics because they require multiple manipulations and are often produced in an autologous manner. Strategies to lower the cost of goods to produce a cell therapy could make a significant impact on its total cost. Borrowing from the field of bioprocess development, the authors took a design of experiments (DoE)-based approach to understanding the manufacture of a cell therapy product in pre-clinical development, analyzing main cost factors in the production process. The cells used for these studies were autologous CD4 Using gene editing efficiency as the response variable, an initial screen was conducted for other variables that could influence the editing frequency. The multiplicity of infection (MOI) of AAV and amount of single guide RNA (sgRNA) were the significant factors used for the optimization step to generate a response contour plot. Cost analysis was done for multiple points in the design space to find cost drivers that could be reduced. For the range of values tested (50 000-750 000 vg/cell AAV and 0.8-4 μg sgRNA), editing with the highest MOI and sgRNA yielded the best gene editing frequency. However, cost analysis showed the optimal solution was gene editing at 193 000 vg/cell AAV and 1.78 μg sgRNA. The authors used DoE to define key factors affecting the gene editing process for a potential investigational therapeutic, providing a novel and faster data-based approach to understanding factors driving complex biological processes. This approach could be applied in process development and aid in achieving more robust strategies for the manufacture of cellular therapeutics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AIMS
Cell therapies are costlier to manufacture than small molecules and protein therapeutics because they require multiple manipulations and are often produced in an autologous manner. Strategies to lower the cost of goods to produce a cell therapy could make a significant impact on its total cost.
METHODS
Borrowing from the field of bioprocess development, the authors took a design of experiments (DoE)-based approach to understanding the manufacture of a cell therapy product in pre-clinical development, analyzing main cost factors in the production process. The cells used for these studies were autologous CD4
RESULTS
Using gene editing efficiency as the response variable, an initial screen was conducted for other variables that could influence the editing frequency. The multiplicity of infection (MOI) of AAV and amount of single guide RNA (sgRNA) were the significant factors used for the optimization step to generate a response contour plot. Cost analysis was done for multiple points in the design space to find cost drivers that could be reduced. For the range of values tested (50 000-750 000 vg/cell AAV and 0.8-4 μg sgRNA), editing with the highest MOI and sgRNA yielded the best gene editing frequency. However, cost analysis showed the optimal solution was gene editing at 193 000 vg/cell AAV and 1.78 μg sgRNA.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors used DoE to define key factors affecting the gene editing process for a potential investigational therapeutic, providing a novel and faster data-based approach to understanding factors driving complex biological processes. This approach could be applied in process development and aid in achieving more robust strategies for the manufacture of cellular therapeutics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35227602
pii: S1465-3249(22)00044-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.01.009
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

RNA, Guide 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

590-596

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Esmond Lee (E)

Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: esmond@stanford.edu.

Devin Shah (D)

Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Matthew Porteus (M)

Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

J Fraser Wright (JF)

Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Rosa Bacchetta (R)

Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA; Center for Definitive and Curative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. Electronic address: rosab@stanford.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH