Mobile phone access, willingness, and usage for HIV-related services among young adults living in informal urban settlements in Kenya: A cross-sectional analysis.


Journal

International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 18 10 2021
revised: 24 01 2022
accepted: 21 02 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 5 4 2022
entrez: 1 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Mobile phone-based health (mHealth) interventions have the potential to improve HIV outcomes for high-risk young adults living in informal urban settlements in Kenya. However, less is known regarding young adults' differential access to mobile phones and their willingness and use of mobile phone technologies to access HIV prevention, care, and treatment services. This is important as young adults make up the largest demographic segment of impoverished, informal urban settlements and are disproportionately impacted by HIV. This study used observational survey data from 350 young adults, aged 18-22, who were living informal urban settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Respondent driven sampling methods were used to recruit and enroll eligible youth. Using descriptive statistics and logistical regressions, we examined the prevalence of mobile phone access, willingness, and use for HIV services. We also assessed associated demographic characteristics in the odds of access, willingness, and use. The mean age of participants was 19 years (±1.3). 56% were male. Mobile phone coverage, including text messaging and mobile internet, was high (>80%), but only 15% of young adults had ever used mobile phones to access HIV services. Willingness was high (65%), especially among those who had individual phone access (77%) compared to lower willingness (18%) among those who shared a phone. More educated (OR = 1.84, 95 %CI:1.14-2.97) and employed (OR = 1.70, 95 %CI:1.02 = 2.83) young adults were also more willing to use phones for HIV services. In contrast, participants living in large households (OR = 0.47, 95 %CI:0.24-0.921), were religious minorities (OR = 0.56, 95 %CI:0.32-0.99), partnered/married (OR = 0.30, 95 %CI:0.10-0.91), or female (OR = 0.29, 95 %CI:0.16-0.55) were significantly less likely to have mobile phone access or usage, limiting their potential participation in HIV-related mHealth interventions. Given the low usage of mobile phones currently for HIV services, no differences in demographic characteristics were observed. Mobile health technologies may be under-utilized in HIV services for at-risk youth. Our findings highlight the importance of preliminary, formative research regarding population differences in access, willingness, and use of mobile phones for HIV services. More efforts are needed to ensure that mHealth interventions account for potential differences in preferences for mobile phone-based HIV interventions by gender, age, religion, education, and/or employment status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Mobile phone-based health (mHealth) interventions have the potential to improve HIV outcomes for high-risk young adults living in informal urban settlements in Kenya. However, less is known regarding young adults' differential access to mobile phones and their willingness and use of mobile phone technologies to access HIV prevention, care, and treatment services. This is important as young adults make up the largest demographic segment of impoverished, informal urban settlements and are disproportionately impacted by HIV.
METHODS
This study used observational survey data from 350 young adults, aged 18-22, who were living informal urban settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Respondent driven sampling methods were used to recruit and enroll eligible youth. Using descriptive statistics and logistical regressions, we examined the prevalence of mobile phone access, willingness, and use for HIV services. We also assessed associated demographic characteristics in the odds of access, willingness, and use.
RESULTS
The mean age of participants was 19 years (±1.3). 56% were male. Mobile phone coverage, including text messaging and mobile internet, was high (>80%), but only 15% of young adults had ever used mobile phones to access HIV services. Willingness was high (65%), especially among those who had individual phone access (77%) compared to lower willingness (18%) among those who shared a phone. More educated (OR = 1.84, 95 %CI:1.14-2.97) and employed (OR = 1.70, 95 %CI:1.02 = 2.83) young adults were also more willing to use phones for HIV services. In contrast, participants living in large households (OR = 0.47, 95 %CI:0.24-0.921), were religious minorities (OR = 0.56, 95 %CI:0.32-0.99), partnered/married (OR = 0.30, 95 %CI:0.10-0.91), or female (OR = 0.29, 95 %CI:0.16-0.55) were significantly less likely to have mobile phone access or usage, limiting their potential participation in HIV-related mHealth interventions. Given the low usage of mobile phones currently for HIV services, no differences in demographic characteristics were observed.
CONCLUSION
Mobile health technologies may be under-utilized in HIV services for at-risk youth. Our findings highlight the importance of preliminary, formative research regarding population differences in access, willingness, and use of mobile phones for HIV services. More efforts are needed to ensure that mHealth interventions account for potential differences in preferences for mobile phone-based HIV interventions by gender, age, religion, education, and/or employment status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35228007
pii: S1386-5056(22)00042-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104728
pmc: PMC8940651
mid: NIHMS1784276
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104728

Subventions

Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : K01 MH107310
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R25 MH067127
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Références

AIDS Care. 2007;19 Suppl 1:S25-34
pubmed: 17364385
J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jan;21(1):14-7
pubmed: 25059242
Glob Health Promot. 2013 Mar;20(1 Suppl):26-32
pubmed: 23549699
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 10;10(1):13438
pubmed: 32778729
Health Place. 2012 Sep;18(5):1144-52
pubmed: 22591621
Popul Health Metr. 2008 Mar 10;6:1
pubmed: 18331630
Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:31
pubmed: 23330022
AIDS Behav. 2012 Oct;16(7):1993-2002
pubmed: 22610370
Lancet. 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1838-45
pubmed: 21071074
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Aug;23(3):935-41
pubmed: 24212144
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):177-81
pubmed: 18550322
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 05;13:1131
pubmed: 24308409
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 08;14:936
pubmed: 25201051
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Feb;45(1):184-98
pubmed: 21925288
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013 May-Jun;24(3):256-67
pubmed: 23122907
AIDS Behav. 2019 Nov;23(11):3119-3128
pubmed: 30771133
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 17;13:588
pubmed: 23773503
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Jun;43(6):353-9
pubmed: 27200519
J Community Health. 2011 Jun;36(3):456-60
pubmed: 21086028
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Jan;134(1):14-5
pubmed: 24395839
J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Jan;28(1):131-139
pubmed: 31160875
AIDS Behav. 2016 Jun;20(6):1157-72
pubmed: 26238038
AIDS. 2011 Mar 27;25(6):825-34
pubmed: 21252632
Global Health. 2013 May 14;9:20
pubmed: 23672301
Ethics Behav. 2018;28(3):218-234
pubmed: 29632430
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 03;7(7):e12900
pubmed: 31271150
AIDS Res Treat. 2016;2016:5360180
pubmed: 27239340
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Oct 11;5(10):e153
pubmed: 29021132
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Sep 06;4(3):e36
pubmed: 28877861
Int J Med Inform. 2015 May;84(5):341-8
pubmed: 25737460
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35319
pubmed: 22558140
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:67-72
pubmed: 22548601
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0231248
pubmed: 32275677
AIDS Care. 2011 May;23(5):534-41
pubmed: 21287416
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):18-23
pubmed: 22150712
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Oct 16;12:85
pubmed: 24131553
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Dec 11;6(12):e247
pubmed: 29229587
Aust Health Rev. 2012 May;36(2):125-9
pubmed: 22624630
Reprod Health. 2012 Aug 06;9:9
pubmed: 22866753
J Health Commun. 2016 Jul;21(7):725-33
pubmed: 27232544

Auteurs

Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson (L)

Indiana University School of Public Health, Department of Applied Health Sciences, 1025 E. 7th Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ljmayowi@iu.edu.

Bee-Ah Kang (BA)

Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Muthoni Mathai (M)

University of Nairobi, College of Health Sciences, Department of Psychiatry. Kenyatta National Hospital, Off-Ngong Road, Nairobi, Kenya; National Health and Development Organization (NAHEDO), Kenyatta National Hospital, Department of Mental Health, Ralph Bunche Road, P.O. Box 20453 Nairobi, Kenya.

Margaret O Mak'anyengo (MO)

National Health and Development Organization (NAHEDO), Kenyatta National Hospital, Department of Mental Health, Ralph Bunche Road, P.O. Box 20453 Nairobi, Kenya.

Fred M Ssewamala (FM)

Washington University in St. Louis, The Brown School, Goldfarb, Room 235, Campus Box 1196, One Brookings, Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA. Electronic address: fms1@wustl.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH