Asperosaponin VI protects mice from sepsis by regulating Hippo and Rho signaling pathway.

Asperosaponin VI Hippo signaling pathway Inflammation RhoC Sepsis

Journal

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology
ISSN: 1618-095X
Titre abrégé: Phytomedicine
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9438794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 22 10 2021
revised: 09 01 2022
accepted: 16 02 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 2 3 2022
entrez: 1 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore the novel protective effect of Asperosaponin VI (AVI) on sepsis and its potential mechanism. In in vitro experiments, bone marrow mononuclear cells and THP-1-derived cells were used to evaluate the viability of AVI treatment. Besides, the quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot were adopted to explore the protective effect of AVI on LPS-induced inflammation. For in vivo work, the effect of AVI on mice was evaluated by using both CLP-induced and the LPS-induced sepsis mice model. The fluctuation of anal temperature and the behavior of mice were recorded after surgery. Further, the content of bacteria in peritoneal lavage fluid was detected, as well as the levels of ALT, AST, LD and LDH in serum with ELISA. H&E staining and real-time PCR were used to evaluate the histopathology of liver, spleen and lung. Finally, relevant signaling pathways were detected by Western blot, real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. AVI inhibited the expression of inflammatory factors in both CLP-induced and LPS-induced sepsis mice models, and reduced the number of bacteria in abdominal lavage fluid. The preventive treatment with AVI alleviated sepsis-induced organ injuries, reduced inflammatory responses, which was through inhibiting Hippo and Rho signaling pathway. This study indicated that AVI effectively protected mice from sepsis by down-regulating the activation of Hippo signaling and Rho family, and reducing inflammation and organ damage. However, conventional treatment was using antibiotics, and its mechanism was different with AVI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35228043
pii: S0944-7113(22)00088-5
doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

154010

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Caixia Pang (C)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Cailing Wen (C)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Yanxiang Liang (Y)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Hui Luo (H)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Linlin Wei (L)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China; Deparment of Pharmacy, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, No. 466 Xingang Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510317, China.

Haiqian Liu (H)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Tian Qin (T)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Huijing Tan (H)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Chonghua He (C)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Ying Liu (Y)

School of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou 510520, China.

Yang Chen (Y)

Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Siyu Zeng (S)

Deparment of Pharmacy, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, No. 466 Xingang Middle Road, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510317, China. Electronic address: zengsy@gd2h.org.cn.

Chun Zhou (C)

SMU-KI United Medical Inflammatory Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Shock and Microcirculation, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, No. 1023-1063, Shatai South Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, China. Electronic address: zhouch@smu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH