Electrophysiological confrontation of Lead-DBS-based electrode localizations in patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing deep brain stimulation.


Journal

NeuroImage. Clinical
ISSN: 2213-1582
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage Clin
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101597070

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 08 09 2021
revised: 06 01 2022
accepted: 21 02 2022
pubmed: 2 3 2022
medline: 20 5 2022
entrez: 1 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Microelectrode recordings (MERs) are often used during deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries to confirm the position of electrodes in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The present study focused on 32 patients who had undergone DBS surgery for advanced Parkinson's disease. The first objective was to confront the anatomical locations of intraoperative individual MERs as determined electrophysiologically with those determined postoperatively by image reconstructions. The second aim was to search for differences in cell characteristics among the three subthalamic nucleus (STN) subdivisions and between the STN and other identified subcortical structures. Using the DISTAL atlas implemented in the Lead-DBS image reconstruction toolbox, each MER location was determined postoperatively and attributed to specific anatomical structures (sensorimotor, associative or limbic STN; substantia nigra [SN], thalamus, nucleus reticularis polaris, zona incerta [ZI]). The STN dorsal borders determined intraoperatively from electrophysiology were then compared with the STN dorsal borders determined by the reconstructed images. Parameters of spike clusters (firing rates, amplitudes - with minimum amplitude of 60 μV -, spike durations, amplitude spectral density of β-oscillations) were compared between structures (ANOVAs on ranks). Two hundred and thirty one MERs were analyzed (144 in 34 STNs, 7 in 4 thalami, 5 in 4 ZIs, 34 in 10 SNs, 41 others). The average difference in depth of the electrophysiological dorsal STN entry in comparison with the STN entry obtained with Lead-DBS was found to be of 0.1 mm (standard deviation: 0.8 mm). All 12 analyzed MERs recorded above the electrophysiologically-determined STN entry were confirmed to be in the thalamus or zona incerta. All MERs electrophysiologically attributed to the SN were confirmed to belong to this nucleus. However, 6/34 MERs that were electrophysiologically attributed to the ventral STN were postoperatively reattributed to the SN. Furthermore, 44 MERs of 3 trajectories, which were intraoperatively attributed to the STN, were postoperatively reattributed to the pallidum or thalamus. MER parameters seemed to differ across the STN, with higher spike amplitudes (H = 10.64, p < 0.01) and less prevalent β-oscillations (H = 9.81, p < 0.01) in the limbic STN than in the sensorimotor and associative subdivisions. Some cells, especially in the SN, showed longer spikes with lower firing rates, in agreement with described characteristics of dopamine cells. However, these probabilistic electrophysiological signatures might become clinically less relevant with the development of image reconstruction tools, which deserve to be applied intraoperatively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35231852
pii: S2213-1582(22)00036-5
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102971
pmc: PMC8885791
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102971

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Faculty of medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Abdullah Al Awadhi (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Rémi Tyrand (R)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Andreas Horn (A)

Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

Astrid Kibleur (A)

Department of Neurology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Julia Vincentini (J)

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.

André Zacharia (A)

Department of Neurology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pierre R Burkhard (PR)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Shahan Momjian (S)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Colette Boëx (C)

Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: Colette.Boex@hcuge.ch.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH