Effect of a fiber-reinforcing technique for direct composite restorations of structurally compromised teeth on marginal microleakage.
bulk fill
composite resins
incremental technique
marginal microleakage
reinforcing fibers
structurally compromised teeth
Journal
Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1708-8240
Titre abrégé: J Esthet Restor Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101096515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
revised:
15
02
2022
received:
23
12
2021
accepted:
17
02
2022
pubmed:
3
3
2022
medline:
11
5
2022
entrez:
2
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate if the marginal microleakage of extensive Class I composite resin restorations can be affected by applying ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers with the wallpapering technique combined with different restorative materials and methods. A 120 human molars were selected and one extensive Class I cavity was prepared on the occlusal surface of each tooth. The specimens were divided into 12 groups (n = 10) according to the type of restorative material (Filtek Z550, Beautifil II LS or Beautifil Bulk Restorative), the use or not of reinforcing fibers (ribbond) and the applied restorative technique (incremental or bulk). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling and then immersed into a 50 wt% silver nitrate solution following a dying protocol. Subsequently, the teeth were prepared for SEM observations to evaluate the extent of marginal microleakage. Three-way ANOVA revealed that the type of material, the use of ribbond fibers and the type of restorative technique significantly affected marginal microleakage (p < 0.001). Application of ribbond fibers decreased marginal microleakage to all tested restorative materials, regardless of the restorative technique, in a range of 31.2-81.4%. In the groups with no-use of ribbond fibers, among the materials there were no significant differences in microleakage when the teeth were restored with the incremental technique (p > 0.05). The use of UHMWPE fibers with wallpapering technique in Class I composite restorations may be an effective method to reduce marginal microleakage, regardless of the selected restorative technique or the material. Clinicians may be encouraged to utilize reinforcing fiber restorative techniques for direct restorations of structurally compromised teeth as a valid alternative to indirect restorations.
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
650-660Subventions
Organisme : Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Magne P. Esthetic and Biomimetic Restorative Dentistry: Manual for Posterior Esthetic Restorations. USC School of Dentistry; 2006.
Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimidou O. Biomimetic dentistry: basic principles and protocols. ARC J Dent Sci. 2020;5:1-3.
Alleman DS, Matthew A, Alleman CDS. The protocols of biomimetic restorative dentistry: 2002 to 2017. Increase the longevity of restorations with the biomimetic approach. Inside Dent. 2017;13:1.
Rudo DN, Karbhari VM. Physical behaviors of fiber reinforcement as applied to tooth stabilization. Dent Clin N Am. 1999;43:7-35.
Karbhari VM, Wang Q. Influence of triaxial braid denier on ribbon-based fiber reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23:969-976.
Meiers JC, Kazemi RB, Donadio M. The influence of fiber reinforcement of composites on shear bond strengths to enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:388-393.
Deliperi S, Alleman D, Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: fiber design according to the “wallpapering” technique. Oper Dent. 2017;42:233-243.
Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y. The effect of flexural load cycling on microleakage of cervical resin composites. Oper Dent. 2001;26:451-459.
Hammesfahr PD, Huang CT, Shaffer SE. Microleakage and bond strength of resin restorations with various bonding agents. Dent Mater. 1987;3:194-199.
Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995;20:18-25.
Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636-1639.
Jenson ME, Chan DC. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, eds. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Peter Szulc; 1985:243.
Bausch JR, De Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, De Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;48:59-67.
Longuercio AD, Reis A, Schroeder M, et al. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2004;32:459-470.
Kaisarly D, El Gezawi M. Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review. Odontology. 2016;104:257-270.
Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. Polymerization efficiency of bulk-fill dental resin composites with different curing modes. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016;133:43392.
Nanjundasetty JK, Nanda S, Panuganti V, Marigowda JC. Marginal sealing ability of silorane and methacrylate resin composites in class II cavities: a scanning electron microscope study. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16:503-508.
Belli S, Orucoglu H, Yildirim C, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in class II adhesive restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:175-181.
He Z, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro-tensile bond strength of resin composite in class I cavities. Dent Mater. 2007;23:533-538.
Amaral CM, de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Ambrosano GM. Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on microleakage and microhardness. Quintessence Int. 2002;33:685-689.
Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of class V resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:303-308.
Aranha AC, Pimenta LA. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage. Am J Dent. 2004;17:99-103.
Hegde V, Sali AV. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composite in comparison to the incremental placement technique. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20:360-364.
Dionysopoulos D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P. The effect of composition, temperature and post-irradiation curing of bulk fill resin composites on polymerization efficiency. Mater Res. 2016;19:466-473.
García Marí L, Climent Gil A. LLena Puy C. in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class II composite restorations: high-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater J. 2019;38:721-727.
Benetti A, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honore D, et al. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent. 2015;40:190-200.
Zotti F, Falavigna E, Capocasale G, De Santis D, Albanese M. Microleakage of direct restorations. Comparison between bulk-fill and traditional composite resins: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Dent. 2021;15:755-767.
Ilie N, Stark K. Curing behavior of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:977-985.
Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V. Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater. 2008;24:901-907.
El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013;39:374-382.
Ilie N, Keßler A, Durner J. Influence of various irradiation processes on the mechanical properties and polymerisation kinetics of bulk-fill resin based composites. J Dent. 2013;41:695-702.
Marovic D, Taubock TT, Attin T, et al. Monomer conversion and shrinkage force kinetics of low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73:474-480.
Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC. Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2009;25:1411-1418.
He J, Liu F, Vallittu KP, Lassila LVGJ. Synthesis of dimethacrylates monomers with low polymerization shrinkage and its application in dental composites materials. Polym Res. 2012;19:9932.
Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate based dental resins. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1819-1829.
Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJP. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012;40:500-505.
Sadr A, Bakhitiari B, Hayashi J, et al. Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Dent Mater. 2020;36:527-534.
Hasija KM, Meena B, Wadhwa D, Aggarwal V. Effects of adding ribbondfibres on marginal adaptation in class II composite restorations in teeth with affected dentine. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10:203-205.
El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, et al. Gingival microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts. Oper Dent. 2007;32:298-305.
Ozel E, Soyman M. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent. 2009;34:174-180.
Mangoush E, Garoushi S, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, Säilynoja E. Effect of fiber reinforcement type on the performance of large posterior restorations: a review of in vitro studies. Polymers. 2021;13:3682.
Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:1387-1398.
Akman S, Akman M, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Influence of several fiber-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2011;44:407-415.
Belli S, Donmez N, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of C factor and flowable resin or fiber use at interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:247-253.
Xu HH, Schumacher GE, Eichmiller FC, et al. Continuous fiber perform reinforcement of dental resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2003;19:523-530.
Dionysopoulos D, Strakas D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Koumpia E. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on bovine enamel surface during in-office tooth bleaching ex vivo. Odontology. 2017;105:320-328.
International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry - testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO/TS 11405: 2013.
Costa JF, Siqueira WF, Loguercio AD, et al. Characterization of aqueous silver nitrate solutions for leakage tests. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19:254-259.
Jacker-Guhr S, Ibarra G, Oppermann LS, Lührs AK, Rahman A, Geurtsen W. Evaluation of microleakage in class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:1709-1718.