Is methylmethacrylate toxic during pregnancy and breastfeeding?--- a systematic review.
Bone cement
Dentistry
Maternal fetal health
Methyl methacrylate
Orthopaedic surgery
Pregnancy
Toxicity
Journal
Arthroplasty (London, England)
ISSN: 2524-7948
Titre abrégé: Arthroplasty
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773073
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2021
03 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
3
3
2022
pubmed:
4
3
2022
medline:
4
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is commonly used in the fields of dentistry and orthopaedic surgery. However, there remain concerns for the occupational hazards of MMA, particularly during pregnancy and breastfeeding. We performed a systematic review of studies on effects that MMA may have in pregnancy in the context of exposure during orthopaedic surgery and dentistry. Review articles, studies lacking statistical data, single case reports and other evidence level V studies were excluded. Nine studies were included. One basic science study demonstrated an increase in neuronal cell lysis and shrunken cell bodies when neocortical neurons were exposed to MMA monomer. Three animal studies exposed pregnant rodents to MMA via intraperitoneal injection or inhalation. Exposed fetuses in two studies had an increase in gross abnormalities such as hemangiomas, while there was no increase in teratologic effects in the third study. In dental workers exposed to MMA, two retrospective cohort studies did not find a statistically significant increase in birth defects or miscarriage. After exposure to MMA during total joint arthroplasty, two studies found that MMA levels were undetectable in the mothers' serum or breast milk. One study measuring the airborne levels of MMA during simulated joint arthroplasty found that concentrations never exceeded 1% of the recommended limit set forth by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Potential teratologic effects of MMA cannot be excluded by existing evidence. However, the typical MMA exposure levels for dental and orthopaedic personnel appear to be substantially less than currently proposed exposure limits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35236460
doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00059-z
pii: 10.1186/s42836-020-00059-z
pmc: PMC8796479
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
9Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):1957-61
pubmed: 16951111
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):406-9
pubmed: 23245392
Dent Mater J. 2013;32(3):519-21
pubmed: 23719017
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jun 6;94(11):e77
pubmed: 22637217
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 May;22(5):326-32
pubmed: 24788448
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):e1411-5
pubmed: 22159863
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Jun;25(3):285-90
pubmed: 10450781
Occup Environ Med. 2007 Feb;64(2):127-33
pubmed: 17053021
Chin J Physiol. 1998 Dec 31;41(4):203-9
pubmed: 10099867
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1979 Sep 30;50(3):451-8
pubmed: 516058
Int Dent J. 2003 Jun;53(3):126-31
pubmed: 12873108
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015 Nov;88(8):1043-51
pubmed: 25680998
J Dent Res. 1972 Nov-Dec;51(6):1632-8
pubmed: 4508973
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Apr;60(3):355-8
pubmed: 649638
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2005;11(3):283-9
pubmed: 16219156
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Aug;30(8):1464-9
pubmed: 25795235
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Mar 02;4(3):
pubmed: 32440633