Efficacy of HD201 vs Referent Trastuzumab in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated in the Neoadjuvant Setting: A Multicenter Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.


Journal

JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 4 3 2022
medline: 24 5 2022
entrez: 3 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The drug HD201 is a biosimilar candidate for breast cancer treatment as the reference trastuzumab. To compare the efficacy of HD201 with referent trastuzumab. This randomized clinical trial (TROIKA) included 502 women with ERBB2-positive early breast cancer treated with either HD201 or referent trastuzumab. It was conducted across 70 centers in 12 countries, including Western and Eastern Europe and Asian countries. Randomization was stratified by tumor hormone receptor status, clinical stage, and geographic region of recruitment. This analysis was conducted on February 12, 2021, after the completion of the adjuvant phase at a median of 31 months (IQR, 28-33 months) of follow-up. Patients with ERBB2-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive HD201 or referent trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting for 8 cycles, concurrently with 4 cycles of docetaxel, which was followed by 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Patients then underwent surgery, which was followed by treatment with 10 cycles of adjuvant HD201 or referent trastuzumab. The primary end point was the total pathological complete response (tpCR) assessed after neoadjuvant treatment. Equivalence was concluded if the 95% CI of the absolute difference in tpCR between arms in the per-protocol set was within the margin of more or less than 15%. Other objectives included the breast pathological complete response, overall response, event-free and overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. A total of 502 female patients (mean [range] age, 53 [26-82] years) were randomized to receive either HD201 or referent trastuzumab, and 474 (94.2%) were eligible for inclusion in the per-protocol set. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms; 195 tumors (38.8%) were hormone receptor-negative , and 213 patients (42.4%) had clinical stage III disease. The tpCR rates were 45% and 48.7% for HD201 and referent trastuzumab, respectively. The difference between the 2 groups was not significant at -3.8% (95% CI, -12.8% to 5.4%) and fell within the predefined equivalence margins. The ratio of the tpCR rates between the 2 arms was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76 to 1.12). A total of 433 patients (86.1%) presented with 2232 treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest for trastuzumab during the entire treatment period, with 220 (88.0%) and 213 (84.5%) patients in the HD201 and referent trastuzumab groups, respectively. The results of this randomized clinical trial found that HD201 demonstrated equivalence to referent trastuzumab in terms of efficacy for the end point of tpCR, with a similar safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03013504.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35238873
pii: 2789767
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.8171
pmc: PMC8895313
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab P188ANX8CK
trastuzumab biosimilar HD201 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03013504']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

698-705

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Auteurs

Xavier Pivot (X)

Institute of Cancer Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

M A Georgievich (MA)

St Petersburg GBUZ City Clinical Oncology Dispensary, St Petersburg, Russia.

Volodymyr Shamrai (V)

Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Vinnytsia, Ukraine.

Giorgi Dzagnidze (G)

S. Khechinashvili University Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Hwoei Fen Soo Hoo (HF)

Penang General Hospital, Penang Island, Malaysia.

Viriya Kaewkangsadan (V)

Department of Surgery, Phramongkutklao hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Fausto Petrelli (F)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Trevigilio, Bergamo, Italy.

Cristian Villanueva (C)

Clinique Clementville, Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Lipatov O Nikolaevich (LO)

Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health Bashkortostan Republic, Republic of Russia.

Jocelyn Hii (J)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Jamie Kim (J)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Sumita Pradhan (S)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Litha Jaison (L)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Peggy Feyaerts (P)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Leonard Kaufman (L)

DICE, Naamloze vennootschap, Belgium.

Marie-Paule Derde (MP)

DICE, Naamloze vennootschap, Belgium.

Ghislain M C Bonamy (GMC)

Prestige BioPharma Ltd, Singapore.

Filip Deforce (F)

DICE, Naamloze vennootschap, Belgium.

David G Cox (DG)

Institute of Cancer Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH