Reliability of AMH and AFC measurements and their correlation: a large multicenter study.
AFC
AMH
Bologna criteria
IVF
Ovarian reserve
Poor ovarian responders
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
30
07
2021
accepted:
28
02
2022
pubmed:
5
3
2022
medline:
18
5
2022
entrez:
4
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) are correlated with the ovarian response, but their reliability and reproducibility are questionable. This large multicenter study describes their distribution, inter-cycle and inter-center variability, and their correlation. A total of 25,854 IVF cycles among 15,219 patients were selected in 12 ART centers. Statistical distribution of AMH and AFC was studied by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro goodness of fit test. The reproducibility of AFC and AMH was measured using a mixed model regressing the logarithmic transformation of AFC with age. The distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by a wide dispersion of values, twice more important for AFC, and a logarithmic distribution. The faster decline in AMH than in AFC with age suggests that their correlation changes with age. AMH and AFC showed a very low proportion of concordance in the range of expected poor responders according to Bologna cutoffs. The heterogeneity for AMH and AFC across centers was small, but much larger across patients within each center. Concerning the patients with several successive cycles, the reproducibility for AMH seemed much better than for AFC. Comparing respective performances of AMH and AFC for the prediction of ovarian response depended on the local conditions for measuring these indicators and on the reproducibility of results improved over time. Distribution of AMH and AFC was characterized by the wide dispersion of values, and a logarithmic distribution. Establishing cutoffs or a direct relationship AMH/AFC without considering age seems hazardous. Correlation between AMH and AFC was very poor in the range of poor responders.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35243569
doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02449-5
pii: 10.1007/s10815-022-02449-5
pmc: PMC9107554
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Mullerian Hormone
80497-65-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1045-1053Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Fertil Steril. 2013 May;99(6):1791-7
pubmed: 23433830
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):334-52
pubmed: 24345633
J Endocrinol Invest. 2015 Sep;38(9):1007-15
pubmed: 25981081
Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):1074-1080.e4
pubmed: 25681853
Fertil Steril. 2010 Aug;94(3):1044-51
pubmed: 19589513
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Aug;52(8):1143-52
pubmed: 24622790
Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):661-670.e1
pubmed: 30196963
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jan;25(1):221-7
pubmed: 19840990
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):84-92
pubmed: 26498177
Hum Reprod. 2012 Apr;27(4):1066-72
pubmed: 22279090
Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1623-34
pubmed: 9699234
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):238-43
pubmed: 22130324
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):825-829
pubmed: 28378557
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1800-1806
pubmed: 27692436
Menopause. 2018 Sep;25(9):1046-1055
pubmed: 29738413
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):26-36
pubmed: 23188168
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40
pubmed: 24077980
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;33(7):515-518
pubmed: 28277111
Hum Reprod. 2011 Dec;26(12):3413-23
pubmed: 21954280
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24
pubmed: 21505041
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Nov 27;9:686
pubmed: 30542322
Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Mar-Apr;16(2):113-30
pubmed: 19793843
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Apr;98(4):1602-11
pubmed: 23463653
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Oct;33(4):506-512
pubmed: 27502068
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):698-710
pubmed: 25489055
J Ovarian Res. 2019 May 25;12(1):48
pubmed: 31128593
Fertil Steril. 2015 Oct;104(4):884-890.e2
pubmed: 26187300
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 23;5:2911
pubmed: 28232864
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):10-20
pubmed: 29080259
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1499-1505
pubmed: 30007353
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;20(3):270-5
pubmed: 12230451
Mol Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;19(8):519-27
pubmed: 23562944
Reprod Sci. 2016 Aug;23(8):1019-27
pubmed: 26763552
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Aug;55(4):384-9
pubmed: 26230428
Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1410-1416
pubmed: 19740463
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Jul 4;17(1):51
pubmed: 31272468
Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):438-44
pubmed: 23602319
Hum Reprod Open. 2017 Nov 13;2017(3):hox018
pubmed: 30895232