Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) among the Italian Dementia Centers: a study by the Italian DLB study group (DLB-SINdem).
Clinical diagnosis
Cognitive impairment
Consensus criteria
Dementia
Dementia with Lewy bodies
Diagnostic accuracy
Diagnostic toolkits
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
25
02
2022
pubmed:
5
3
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
entrez:
4
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may represent a diagnostic challenge, since its clinical picture overlaps with other dementia. Two toolkits have been developed to aid the clinician to diagnose DLB: the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) and the Assessment Toolkit for DLB (AT-DLB). We aim to evaluate the reliability of these two questionnaires, and their ability to enhance the interpretation of the international consensus diagnostic criteria. LBCRS and AT-DLB were distributed to 135 Italian Neurological Centers for Cognitive Decline and Dementia (CDCDs), with the indication to administer them to all patients with dementia referred within the subsequent 3 months. We asked to subsequently apply consensus criteria for DLB diagnosis, to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the two toolkits. A total of 23 Centers joined the study; 1854 patients were enrolled. We found a prevalence of possible or probable DLB of 13% each (26% total), according to the consensus criteria. LBCRS toolkit showed good reliability, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.77, stable even after removing variables from the construct. AT-DLB toolkit Cronbach alpha was 0.52 and, after the subtraction of the "cognitive fluctuation" criterion, was only 0.31. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were higher for LBCRS vs. AT-DLB. However, when simultaneously considered in the logistic models, AT-DLB showed a better performance (p < 0.001). Overall, the concordance between LBCRS positive and AT-DLB possible/probable was of 78.02% CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, the LBCRS and AT-DLB questionnaires have good accuracy for DLB diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35244829
doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-05987-z
pii: 10.1007/s10072-022-05987-z
pmc: PMC9213280
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4221-4229Subventions
Organisme : Italian Ministry of Health Research Grant Ricerca Finalizzata 2018
ID : RF-2018-12366209
Investigateurs
Baschi Roberta
(B)
Fragiacomo Federica
(F)
Galantucci Sebastiano
(G)
Gaspari Caterina
(G)
Gazzola Gianmarco
(G)
Magnani Giuseppe
(M)
Mazzon Giulia
(M)
Mozzetta Stefano
(M)
Ravanelli Carmela
(R)
Ruggiero Marco
(R)
Salute Pierpaolo
(S)
Scamarcia Pietro Giuseppe
(SP)
Turla Marinella
(T)
Verde Federico
(V)
Volontè Maria Antonietta
(VM)
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Neurology. 2017 Jul 4;89(1):88-100
pubmed: 28592453
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Mar 1;10(1):27
pubmed: 29490691
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
Ann Neurol. 2016 Sep;80(3):368-78
pubmed: 27398636
Neurol Sci. 2017 Jan;38(1):83-91
pubmed: 27624723
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14
pubmed: 7991117
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018 Feb 15;10(1):19
pubmed: 29448953
Acta Neurol Belg. 2021 Feb;121(1):219-223
pubmed: 32931000
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Sep 1;1(3):316-324
pubmed: 26405688
Mov Disord. 2003 Jul;18(7):738-50
pubmed: 12815652
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 May 15;9(5):475-80
pubmed: 23674939
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010 Jul;16(6):388-92
pubmed: 20434939
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016 Mar;31(2):137-43
pubmed: 26340964
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;177:252-6
pubmed: 11040887
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;33(10):1293-1304
pubmed: 30091150
Neurology. 2020 Apr 28;94(17):743-755
pubmed: 32241955