Contrasting patterns of venom regeneration in a centipede (Scolopendra viridis) and a scorpion (Centruroides hentzi).


Journal

Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology
ISSN: 1879-3150
Titre abrégé: Toxicon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1307333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 18 11 2021
revised: 22 02 2022
accepted: 28 02 2022
pubmed: 5 3 2022
medline: 22 3 2022
entrez: 4 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As biochemical traits with clear fitness consequences, venoms serve a critical ecological role for the animals that produce them. Understanding how venoms are maintained and regenerated after use will, therefore, provide valuable insight into the ecology of venomous animals. Furthermore, most studies on venomous organisms often require removing animals from the wild and waiting extended periods of time between venom extractions. Uncovering the patterns of venom regeneration across different species will likely lead to the development of more efficient venom extraction protocols, reducing both experimental time and the number of animals required. Using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, we identified asynchronous regeneration of venom protein component abundances in the centipede Scolopendra viridis, but found no evidence for asynchronous venom regeneration in the scorpion Centruroides hentzi. We also observed high levels of intraspecific venom variation in C. hentzi, emphasizing the importance of testing for intraspecific venom variation in studies evaluating the synchronicity of venom regeneration. Although the regeneration of relative venom protein component abundances is an asynchronous process in S. viridis, we provide evidence that the presence-absence of major venom components is not an asynchronous process and suggest that studies relying on just the presence-absence of individual proteins (e.g. bioprospecting, drug discovery) could use catch-and-release methods of venom extraction to reduce the number of animals removed from the wild.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35245607
pii: S0041-0101(22)00063-0
doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2022.02.022
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0
Scorpion Venoms 0
Venoms 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

132-140

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Gunnar S Nystrom (GS)

Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Lucy G Fry (LG)

Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Schyler A Ellsworth (SA)

Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.

Darin R Rokyta (DR)

Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA. Electronic address: drokyta@bio.fsu.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH