Artificial intelligence for detection of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-a multicentric analysis of a pre-screening tool for clinical application.
Lynch syndrome
artificial intelligence
biomarker
colorectal cancer
deep learning
microsatellite instability
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
27
08
2021
revised:
18
01
2022
accepted:
21
01
2022
pubmed:
6
3
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
entrez:
5
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds. We trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities. Classifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a rule-out test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies. When applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) is a key genetic feature which should be tested in every patient with colorectal cancer (CRC) according to medical guidelines. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods can detect MSI/dMMR directly in routine pathology slides, but the test performance has not been systematically investigated with predefined test thresholds.
METHOD
We trained and validated AI-based MSI/dMMR detectors and evaluated predefined performance metrics using nine patient cohorts of 8343 patients across different countries and ethnicities.
RESULTS
Classifiers achieved clinical-grade performance, yielding an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of up to 0.96 without using any manual annotations. Subsequently, we show that the AI system can be applied as a rule-out test: by using cohort-specific thresholds, on average 52.73% of tumors in each surgical cohort [total number of MSI/dMMR = 1020, microsatellite stable (MSS)/ proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) = 7323 patients] could be identified as MSS/pMMR with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. In an additional cohort of N = 1530 (MSI/dMMR = 211, MSS/pMMR = 1319) endoscopy biopsy samples, the system achieved an AUROC of 0.89, and the cohort-specific threshold ruled out 44.12% of tumors with a fixed sensitivity at 95%. As a more robust alternative to cohort-specific thresholds, we showed that with a fixed threshold of 0.25 for all the cohorts, we can rule-out 25.51% in surgical specimens and 6.10% in biopsies.
INTERPRETATION
When applied in a clinical setting, this means that the AI system can rule out MSI/dMMR in a quarter (with global thresholds) or half of all CRC patients (with local fine-tuning), thereby reducing cost and turnaround time for molecular profiling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35247870
pii: S2059-7029(22)00021-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100400
pmc: PMC9058894
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100400Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure JNK declares consulting services for Owkin, France and Panakeia, UK. TJB reports owning a company that develops mobile apps, outside the scope of the submitted work (Smart Health Heidelberg GmbH, Handschuhsheimer Landstr. 9/1, 69120 Heidelberg). PQ has had paid roles in the English NHS bowel cancer screening programme over the course of this study. SBG is co-founder of Brogent International LLC with equity, outside the scope of the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Jul 16;2:
pubmed: 32913995
Theranostics. 2020 Sep 2;10(24):11080-11091
pubmed: 33042271
Cancer Cell. 2018 Apr 9;33(4):721-735.e8
pubmed: 29622466
Br J Cancer. 2021 Feb;124(4):686-696
pubmed: 33204028
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(3):199-211
pubmed: 33514930
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2073-2087.e3
pubmed: 20420947
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 08;11:630953
pubmed: 34168975
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3761-7
pubmed: 21876077
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Oct;3(10):e654-e664
pubmed: 34417147
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;39(5):1333-44
pubmed: 20427463
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):132-141
pubmed: 33387492
Mod Pathol. 2021 Dec;34(12):2098-2108
pubmed: 34168282
Nat Cancer. 2020 Aug;1(8):789-799
pubmed: 33763651
Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1350-6
pubmed: 26457759
Nat Med. 2019 Jul;25(7):1054-1056
pubmed: 31160815
Histopathology. 2021 Nov;79(5):690-699
pubmed: 33872400
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 3;11(1):3877
pubmed: 32747659
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 3;383(23):2207-2218
pubmed: 33264544
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(3):285-95
pubmed: 2313318
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 13;107(6):djv045
pubmed: 25770147
Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1406-1416.e11
pubmed: 32562722
Lancet. 2007 Dec 15;370(9604):2020-9
pubmed: 18083404
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Dec;40(12):3945-3954
pubmed: 34339370
Nat Genet. 1997 Sep;17(1):79-83
pubmed: 9288102
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Dec;3(12):e763-e772
pubmed: 34686474
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):838-43
pubmed: 20200438
Nature. 2012 Jul 18;487(7407):330-7
pubmed: 22810696
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Oct;52(Pt 2):189-197
pubmed: 29501787
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 1;12(5):1494-500
pubmed: 16533773
Histopathology. 2007 Jan;50(1):103-12
pubmed: 17204025
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e030618
pubmed: 31772088
Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2044-58
pubmed: 20420945