Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review.
Journal
Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)
ISSN: 2754-6993
Titre abrégé: Schizophrenia (Heidelb)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918367987006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 03 2022
05 03 2022
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
accepted:
16
12
2021
entrez:
6
3
2022
pubmed:
7
3
2022
medline:
7
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many individuals living with severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, present cognitive deficits and reasoning biases negatively impacting clinical and functional trajectories. Remote cognitive assessment presents many opportunities for advancing research and treatment but has yet to be widely used in psychiatric populations. We conducted a scoping review of remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness to provide an overview of available measures and guide best practices. Overall, 34 studies (n = 20,813 clinical participants) were reviewed and remote measures, psychometrics, facilitators, barriers, and future directions were synthesized using a logic model. We identified 82 measures assessing cognition in severe mental illness across 11 cognitive domains and four device platforms. Remote measures were generally comparable to traditional versions, though psychometric properties were infrequently reported. Facilitators included standardized procedures and wider recruitment, whereas barriers included imprecise measure adaptations, technology inaccessibility, low patient engagement, and poor digital literacy. Our review identified several remote cognitive measures in psychiatry across all cognitive domains. However, there is a need for more rigorous validation of these measures and consideration of potentially influential factors, such as sex and gender. We provide recommendations for conducting remote cognitive assessment in psychiatry and fostering high-quality research using digital technologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35249112
doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00219-x
pii: 10.1038/s41537-022-00219-x
pmc: PMC8897553
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
14Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Kahn, R. S. & Keefe, R. S. Schizophrenia is a cognitive illness: time for a change in focus. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 1107–1112 (2013).
pubmed: 23925787
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.155
Solé, B. et al. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: treatment and prevention strategies. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 20, 670–680 (2017).
pubmed: 28498954
pmcid: 5570032
doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx032
Bora, E., Binnur Akdede, B. & Alptekin, K. Neurocognitive impairment in deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 47, 2401–2413 (2017).
pubmed: 28468693
doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000952
Rock, P., Roiser, J., Riedel, W. & Blackwell, A. Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Med. 44, 2029 (2014).
pubmed: 24168753
doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002535
Vöhringer, P. A. et al. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review. Front. Psychiatry 4, 87 (2013).
pubmed: 23964248
pmcid: 3737461
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00087
Sauvé, G., Lavigne, K. M., Pochiet, G., Brodeur, M. & Lepage, M. Efficacy of psychological interventions targeting cognitive biases in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 78, 101854 (2020).
pubmed: 32361339
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101854
Broyd, A., Balzan, R. P., Woodward, T. S. & Allen, P. Dopamine, cognitive biases and assessment of certainty: a neurocognitive model of delusions. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 54, 96–106 (2017).
pubmed: 28448827
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.006
Everaert, J., Koster, E. H. W. & Derakshan, N. The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 32, 413–424 (2012).
pubmed: 22681914
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.003
Kelly, S. et al. Neural correlates of cognitive deficits across developmental phases of schizophrenia. Neurobiol. Dis. 131, 104353 (2018).
pubmed: 30582983
doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.12.013
Lavigne, K. M., Menon, M. & Woodward, T. S. Functional brain networks underlying evidence integration and delusions in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 46, 175–183 (2020).
pubmed: 31050762
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz032
Bora, E. & Pantelis, C. Meta-analysis of cognitive impairment in first-episode bipolar disorder: comparison with first-episode schizophrenia and healthy controls. Schizophr. Bull. 41, 1095–1104 (2015).
pubmed: 25616505
pmcid: 4535631
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu198
McCleery, A. & Nuechterlein, K. H. Cognitive impairment in psychotic illness: prevalence, profile of impairment, developmental course, and treatment considerations. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 21, 239–248 (2019).
pubmed: 31749648
pmcid: 6829172
doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/amccleery
Sauve, G., Malla, A., Joober, R., Brodeur, M. B. & Lepage, M. Comparing cognitive clusters across first- and multiple-episode of psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 269, 707–718 (2018).
pubmed: 30273896
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.119
Lepage, M., Bodnar, M. & Bowie, C. R. Neurocognition: clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. Can. J. Psychiatry 59, 5–12 (2014).
pubmed: 24444318
pmcid: 4079224
doi: 10.1177/070674371405900103
Türközer, H. B. & Öngür, D. A projection for psychiatry in the post-COVID-19 era: potential trends, challenges, and directions. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 2214–2219 (2020).
pubmed: 32681098
pmcid: 7366480
doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0841-2
Öngür, D., Perlis, R. & Goff, D. Psychiatry and COVID-19. JAMA 324, 1149–1150 (2020).
pubmed: 32960247
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14294
Lal, S. E-mental health: promising advancements in policy, research, and practice. Healthc. Manage. Forum 32, 56–62 (2019).
Wise, J. et al. WPA position statement on e-mental health. World Psychiatric Association (2017).
Gay, K., Torous, J., Joseph, A., Pandya, A. & Duckworth, K. Digital technology use among individuals with schizophrenia: results of an online survey. JMIR Ment. Health 3, e15 (2016).
pubmed: 27146094
pmcid: 4871994
doi: 10.2196/mental.5379
Abdel-Baki, A., Lal, S., D.-Charron, O., Stip, E. & Kara, N. Understanding access and use of technology among youth with first-episode psychosis to inform the development of technology-enabled therapeutic interventions. Early Interv. Psychiatry 11, 72–76 (2017).
pubmed: 26011657
doi: 10.1111/eip.12250
Sin, J. et al. Digital interventions for screening and treating common mental disorders or symptoms of common mental illness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e20581 (2020).
pubmed: 32876577
pmcid: 7495259
doi: 10.2196/20581
Lal, S. et al. Preferences of young adults with first-episode psychosis for receiving specialized mental health services using technology: a survey study. JMIR Ment. Health 2, e18 (2015).
pubmed: 26543922
pmcid: 4607389
doi: 10.2196/mental.4400
Merchant, R., Torous, J., Rodriguez-Villa, E. & Naslund, J. A. Digital technology for management of severe mental disorders in low-income and middle-income countries. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 33, 501–507 (2020).
pubmed: 32520747
pmcid: 7398830
Lecomte, T. et al. Mobile apps for mental health issues: meta-review of meta-analyses. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 8, e17458 (2020).
pubmed: 32348289
pmcid: 7293054
doi: 10.2196/17458
Guimond, S., Keshavan, M. S. & Torous, J. B. Towards remote digital phenotyping of cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 208, 36–38 (2019).
pubmed: 31047724
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.016
Hays, R. et al. Assessing cognition outside of the clinic: smartphones and sensors for cognitive assessment across diverse psychiatric disorders. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 42, 611–625 (2019).
pubmed: 31672211
pmcid: 7299150
doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2019.08.003
Kilciksiz, C. M., Keefe, R., Benoit, J., Ongur, D. & Torous, J. Verbal memory measurement towards digital perspectives in first-episode psychosis: a review. Schizophr. Res. Cogn. 21, 100177 (2020).
pubmed: 32322540
pmcid: 7163058
doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2020.100177
Bauer, R. M. et al. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 27, 362–373 (2012).
pubmed: 22382386
pmcid: 3499090
doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs027
Bilder, R. M. et al. InterOrganizational practice committee recommendations/guidance for teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 34, 1314–1334 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1767214
Schatz, P. & Browndyke, J. Applications of computer-based neuropsychological assessment. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 17, 395–410 (2002).
pubmed: 12802251
doi: 10.1097/00001199-200210000-00003
Langenecker, S. A. et al. The sensitivity and psychometric properties of a brief computer-based cognitive screening battery in a depression clinic. Psychiatry Res. 152, 143–154 (2007).
pubmed: 17445911
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.03.019
Koo, B. M. & Vizer, L. M. Mobile technology for cognitive assessment of older adults: a scoping review. Innov. Aging 3, igy038 (2019).
pubmed: 30619948
pmcid: 6312550
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy038
Munn, Z. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 18, 143 (2018).
pubmed: 30453902
pmcid: 6245623
doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Khalil, H. et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J. Clin. Epidemiol 130, 156–160 (2021).
pubmed: 33122034
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009
Domen, A. C., van de Weijer, S. C. F., Jaspers, M. W., Denys, D. & Nieman, D. H. The validation of a new online cognitive assessment tool: the MyCognition Quotient. Int. J. Methods Psychiatric Res. 28, e1775 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/mpr.1775
Biagianti, B. et al. Development and testing of a web-based battery to remotely assess cognitive health in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 208, 250–257 (2019).
pubmed: 30733167
pmcid: 6544475
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.047
Buck, G. et al. Sex differences in verbal memory predict functioning through negative symptoms in early psychosis. Schizophr. Bull 46, 1587–1595 (2020).
pubmed: 32307536
pmcid: 7846137
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa054
Vaskinn, A. et al. Sex differences in neuropsychological performance and social functioning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropsychology 25, 499–510 (2011).
pubmed: 21463042
doi: 10.1037/a0022677
Atkins, A. S. et al. Validation of the tablet-administered brief assessment of cognition (BAC App). Schizophr. Res. 181, 100–106 (2017).
pubmed: 27771201
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.10.010
Pop-Jordanova, N., Loleska, S. & Loleski, M. Originally adapted mobile application used for neuropsychiatric patients. Prilozi 39, 75–81 (2018).
pubmed: 30110272
doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2018-0026
Sumner, J. A. et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cognitive function in a large cohort of middle-aged women. Depress. Anxiety 34, 356–366 (2017).
pubmed: 28072503
pmcid: 5378624
doi: 10.1002/da.22600
Metel, D. et al. Mediating role of cognitive biases, resilience and depressive symptoms in the relationship between childhood trauma and psychotic-like experiences in young adults. Early Interven. Psychiatry 14, 87–96 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/eip.12829
Eraydin, I. E. et al. Investigating the relationship between age of onset of depressive disorder and cognitive function. Int. J. Geriatric Psychiatry 34, 38–46 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/gps.4979
Miegel, F., Jelinek, L. & Moritz, S. Dysfunctional beliefs in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression as assessed with the Beliefs Questionnaire (BQ). Psychiatry Res. 272, 265–274 (2019).
pubmed: 30594759
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.070
Moritz, S. et al. Prolonged rather than hasty decision-making in schizophrenia using the box task. Must we rethink the jumping to conclusions account of paranoia?. Schizophr. Res 222, 222–202 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.056
Hung, S. et al. Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment for Chinese patients with depression: an exploratory study in Taiwan. Asian J. Psychiatry 23, 131–136 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.08.003
Bakkour, N. et al. Systematic review of appropriate cognitive assessment instruments used in clinical trials of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 216, 291–302 (2014).
pubmed: 24656516
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.02.014
Bernardo-Ramos, M., Franco-Martin, M. A. & Soto-Perez, F. Cyber-Neuropsychology: application of new technologies in neuropsychological evaluation. Actas Esp. Psiquiatria 40, 308–314 (2012).
Schvetz, C., Gu, F., Drodge, J., Torous, J. & Guimond, S. Validation of an ecological momentary assessment to measure processing speed and executive function in schizophrenia. NPJ Schizophr 7, 1–9 (2021).
Liu, G., Henson, P., Keshavan, M., Pekka-Onnela, J. & Torous, J. Assessing the potential of longitudinal smartphone based cognitive assessment in schizophrenia: a naturalistic pilot study. Schizophr. Res. 17, 100144 (2019).
Hays, R., Keshavan, M., Wisniewski, H. & Torous, J. Deriving symptom networks from digital phenotyping data in serious mental illness. BJPsych Open 6, e135 (2020).
pubmed: 33138889
pmcid: 7745255
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.94
Ludtke, T., Kriston, L., Schroder, J., Lincoln, T. M. & Moritz, S. Negative affect and a fluctuating jumping to conclusions bias predict subsequent paranoia in daily life: an online experience sampling study. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 56, 106–112 (2017).
pubmed: 27639287
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.08.014
Moritz, S. et al. The benefits of doubt: cognitive bias correction reduces hasty decision-making in schizophrenia. Cognit. Ther. Res. 39, 627–635 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s10608-015-9690-8
Moritz, S. et al. Metacognition-augmented cognitive remediation training reduces jumping to conclusions and overconfidence but not neurocognitive deficits in psychosis. Front. Psychol. 6, 1048 (2015).
pubmed: 26283990
pmcid: 4522518
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01048
van der Gaag, M. et al. Development of the Davos assessment of cognitive biases scale (DACOBS). Schizophr. Res. 144, 63–71 (2013).
pubmed: 23332365
doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.010
Peters, E. R. et al. Cognitive biases questionnaire for psychosis. Schizophr. Bull. 40, 300–313 (2014).
pubmed: 23413104
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs199
Germine, L. et al. Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19, 847–857 (2012).
pubmed: 22829343
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0296-9
Cromer, J. A. et al. Comparison of cognitive performance on the Cogstate brief battery when taken in-clinic, in-group, and unsupervised. Clin. Neuropsychol. 29, 542–558 (2015).
pubmed: 26165425
doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1054437
Backx, R., Skirrow, C., Dente, P., Barnett, J. H. & Cormack, F. K. Comparing web-based and lab-based cognitive assessment using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery: a within-subjects counterbalanced study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e16792 (2020).
pubmed: 32749999
pmcid: 7435628
doi: 10.2196/16792
Silverstein, S. M. et al. Development and validation of a World-Wide-Web-based neurocognitive assessment battery: WebNeuro. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 940–949 (2007).
pubmed: 18183911
doi: 10.3758/BF03192989
Gelinas, L., Morrell, W., White, S. A. & Bierer, B. E. Navigating the ethics of remote research data collection. Clin. Trials 18, 606–614 (2021).
pubmed: 34231414
doi: 10.1177/17407745211027245
Hensen, B. et al. Remote data collection for public health research in a COVID-19 era: ethical implications, challenges and opportunities. Health Policy Planning 36, 360–368 (2021).
pubmed: 33881138
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa158
Bowie, C. R., Grossman, M., Gupta, M., Holshausen, K. & Best, M. W. Action-based cognitive remediation for individuals with serious mental illnesses: effects of real-world simulations and goal setting on functional and vocational outcomes. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 40, 53–60 (2017).
pubmed: 27100095
doi: 10.1037/prj0000189
Bowie, C. R., McGurk, S. R., Mausbach, B., Patterson, T. L. & Harvey, P. D. Combined cognitive remediation and functional skills training for schizophrenia: effects on cognition, functional competence, and real-world behavior. Am. J. Psychiatry 169, 710–718 (2012).
pubmed: 22581070
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11091337
Cella, M., Preti, A., Edwards, C., Dow, T. & Wykes, T. Cognitive remediation for negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a network meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 52, 43–51 (2017).
pubmed: 27930934
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.11.009
Wykes, T., Huddy, V., Cellard, C., McGurk, S. R. & Czobor, P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 472–485 (2011).
pubmed: 21406461
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855
Eichner, C. & Berna, F. Acceptance and efficacy of metacognitive training (MCT) on positive symptoms and delusions in patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis taking into account important moderators. Schizophr. Bull. 42, 952–962 (2016).
pubmed: 26748396
pmcid: 4903058
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv225
Moritz, S., Klein, J. P., Lysaker, P. H. & Mehl, S. Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 21, 309–317 (2019).
pubmed: 31749655
pmcid: 6829173
doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/smoritz
Jagtap, S., Romanowska, S., Leibovitz, T., Onno, K. A., Burhan, A. M., & Best, M. W. Can cognitive remediation therapy be delivered remotely? A review examining feasibility and acceptability of remote interventions. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2022.100238 (2022).
Peters, M. D. J. et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth 18, 2119–2126 (2020).
pubmed: 33038124
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
Tricco, A. C. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473 (2018).
pubmed: 30178033
doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Peters, M. D. J. et al. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (eds Aromataris, E & Munn, Z.) JBI. (2020).
Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A. & Simon, M. Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: exploring variation in coder decision-making. Sociol. Methods Res 50, 837–865 (2021).
doi: 10.1177/0049124118799372
Gwet, K. L. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 61, 29–48 (2008).
pubmed: 18482474
doi: 10.1348/000711006X126600
Feinstein, A. R. & Cicchetti, D. V. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43, 543–549 (1990).
pubmed: 2348207
doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
Wongpakaran, N., Wongpakaran, T., Wedding, D. & Gwet, K. L. A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13, 61 (2013).
pubmed: 23627889
pmcid: 3643869
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-61
Zec, S., Soriani, N., Comoretto, R. & Baldi, I. High agreement and high prevalence: the paradox of Cohen’s Kappa. Open Nurs. J. 11, 211–218 (2017).
pubmed: 29238424
pmcid: 5712640
doi: 10.2174/1874434601711010211
W.K. Kellogg Foundation Team. Logic Model Development Guide https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resources/2004/01/logic-model-development-guide W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004).
Baxter, S. K. et al. Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 14, 62 (2014).
pubmed: 24885751
pmcid: 4028001
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-62
Winsper, C., Crawford-Docherty, A., Weich, S., Fenton, S. J. & Singh, S. P. How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 76, 101815 (2020).
pubmed: 32062302
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101815
Chen, H.-T. Theory-driven Evaluations (Sage Publications, Inc, 1990).
Conrad, K. J., Randolph, F. L., Kirby, M. W. J. & Bebout, R. R. Creating and using logic models. Alcohol. Treat. Q. 17, 17–31 (1999).
doi: 10.1300/J020v17n01_02
Nuechterlein, K. H. et al. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity. Am. J. Psychiatry 165, 203–213 (2008).
pubmed: 18172019
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042
Lavigne, K. M., Sauve, G. & Lepage, M. Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review. https://osf.io/wh6vt/ (2020).
Biagianti, B., Schlosser, D., Nahum, M., Woolley, J. & Vinogradov, S. Creating live interactions to mitigate barriers (CLIMB): a mobile intervention to improve social functioning in people with chronic psychotic disorders. JMIR Mental Health 3, e52 (2016).
pubmed: 27965190
pmcid: 5192235
doi: 10.2196/mental.6671
Depp, C. A. et al. Ecological momentary facial emotion recognition in psychotic disorders. Psychol. Med. 1–9, (2021).
Dupuy, M. et al. Mobile cognitive testing in patients with schizophrenia: a controlled study of feasibility and validity. Journal de Therapie Comportementale et Cognitive 28, 204–213 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcc.2018.02.002
Holmlund, T. B. et al. Applying speech technologies to assess verbal memory in patients with serious mental illness. npj Digit. Med. 3, 33 (2020).
pubmed: 32195368
pmcid: 7066153
doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0241-7
Kuhn, S., Berna, F., Ludtke, T., Gallinat, J. & Moritz, S. Fighting depression: action video game play may reduce rumination and increase subjective and objective cognition in depressed patients. Front. Psychol. 9, 129 (2018).
pubmed: 29483888
pmcid: 5816361
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00129
Moritz, S. & Jelinek, L. Inversion of the “unrealistic optimism” bias contributes to overestimation of threat in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav. Cogn. Psychother. 37, 179–193 (2009).
pubmed: 19364418
doi: 10.1017/S1352465808005043
Moritz, S. et al. Repetition is good? An Internet trial on the illusory truth effect in schizophrenia and nonclinical participants. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 43, 1058–1063 (2012).
pubmed: 22683551
doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.04.004
Moritz, S., Andreou, C., Klingberg, S., Thoering, T. & Peters, M. J. V. Assessment of subjective cognitive and emotional effects of antipsychotic drugs. Effect by defect? Neuropharmacology 72, 179–186 (2013).
pubmed: 23643756
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.039
Moritz, S., Spirandelli, K., Happach, I., Lion, D. & Berna, F. Dysfunction by disclosure? Stereotype threat as a source of secondary neurocognitive malperformance in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 24, 584–592 (2018).
pubmed: 29553002
doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000097
Parrish, E. M. et al. Remote ecological momentary testing of learning and memory in adults with serious mental illness. Schizophr. Bull 47, 740–750 (2021).
pubmed: 33219382
doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa172
Preiss, M., Shatil, E., Cermakova, R., Cimermannova, D. & Flesher, I. Personalized cognitive training in unipolar and bipolar disorder: a study of cognitive functioning. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 108 (2013).
Rebchuk, A. D. et al. Assessment of prorated scoring of an abbreviated protocol for the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 26, 1045–1050 (2020).
pubmed: 33081872
doi: 10.1017/S1355617720001010
Siddi, S. et al. Comparison of the touch-screen and traditional versions of the Corsi block-tapping test in patients with psychosis and healthy controls. BMC Psychiatry 20, 1–10 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02716-8
Stain, H. J. et al. The feasibility of videoconferencing for neuropsychological assessments of rural youth experiencing early psychosis. J. Telemed. Telecare 17, 328–331 (2011).
pubmed: 21844174
doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101015