Individual-specific networks for prediction modelling - A scoping review of methods.

Biomarker Genomics Graph theory Individual-specific network Methodological review Network analysis Neurology Pathopsychology Personalized medicine Prediction

Journal

BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 03 2022
Historique:
received: 27 07 2021
accepted: 11 02 2022
entrez: 7 3 2022
pubmed: 8 3 2022
medline: 8 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent advances in biotechnology enable the acquisition of high-dimensional data on individuals, posing challenges for prediction models which traditionally use covariates such as clinical patient characteristics. Alternative forms of covariate representations for the features derived from these modern data modalities should be considered that can utilize their intrinsic interconnection. The connectivity information between these features can be represented as an individual-specific network defined by a set of nodes and edges, the strength of which can vary from individual to individual. Global or local graph-theoretical features describing the network may constitute potential prognostic biomarkers instead of or in addition to traditional covariates and may replace the often unsuccessful search for individual biomarkers in a high-dimensional predictor space. We conducted a scoping review to identify, collate and critically appraise the state-of-art in the use of individual-specific networks for prediction modelling in medicine and applied health research, published during 2000-2020 in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and Embase. Our scoping review revealed the main application areas namely neurology and pathopsychology, followed by cancer research, cardiology and pathology (N = 148). Network construction was mainly based on Pearson correlation coefficients of repeated measurements, but also alternative approaches (e.g. partial correlation, visibility graphs) were found. For covariates measured only once per individual, network construction was mostly based on quantifying an individual's contribution to the overall group-level structure. Despite the multitude of identified methodological approaches for individual-specific network inference, the number of studies that were intended to enable the prediction of clinical outcomes for future individuals was quite limited, and most of the models served as proof of concept that network characteristics can in principle be useful for prediction. The current body of research clearly demonstrates the value of individual-specific network analysis for prediction modelling, but it has not yet been considered as a general tool outside the current areas of application. More methodological research is still needed on well-founded strategies for network inference, especially on adequate network sparsification and outcome-guided graph-theoretical feature extraction and selection, and on how networks can be exploited efficiently for prediction modelling.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Recent advances in biotechnology enable the acquisition of high-dimensional data on individuals, posing challenges for prediction models which traditionally use covariates such as clinical patient characteristics. Alternative forms of covariate representations for the features derived from these modern data modalities should be considered that can utilize their intrinsic interconnection. The connectivity information between these features can be represented as an individual-specific network defined by a set of nodes and edges, the strength of which can vary from individual to individual. Global or local graph-theoretical features describing the network may constitute potential prognostic biomarkers instead of or in addition to traditional covariates and may replace the often unsuccessful search for individual biomarkers in a high-dimensional predictor space.
METHODS
We conducted a scoping review to identify, collate and critically appraise the state-of-art in the use of individual-specific networks for prediction modelling in medicine and applied health research, published during 2000-2020 in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus and Embase.
RESULTS
Our scoping review revealed the main application areas namely neurology and pathopsychology, followed by cancer research, cardiology and pathology (N = 148). Network construction was mainly based on Pearson correlation coefficients of repeated measurements, but also alternative approaches (e.g. partial correlation, visibility graphs) were found. For covariates measured only once per individual, network construction was mostly based on quantifying an individual's contribution to the overall group-level structure. Despite the multitude of identified methodological approaches for individual-specific network inference, the number of studies that were intended to enable the prediction of clinical outcomes for future individuals was quite limited, and most of the models served as proof of concept that network characteristics can in principle be useful for prediction.
CONCLUSION
The current body of research clearly demonstrates the value of individual-specific network analysis for prediction modelling, but it has not yet been considered as a general tool outside the current areas of application. More methodological research is still needed on well-founded strategies for network inference, especially on adequate network sparsification and outcome-guided graph-theoretical feature extraction and selection, and on how networks can be exploited efficiently for prediction modelling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35249534
doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01544-6
pii: 10.1186/s12874-022-01544-6
pmc: PMC8898441
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

62

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Apr 19;8:76
pubmed: 27148045
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Feb;22(2):240-9
pubmed: 26888620
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126
pubmed: 33038124
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:156-160
pubmed: 33122034
Neurology. 2016 Mar 22;86(12):1112-9
pubmed: 26888983
Schizophr Res. 2015 Oct;168(1-2):345-52
pubmed: 26299706
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:399-407
pubmed: 27485752
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2
pubmed: 9623998
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jul 24;5:298-308
pubmed: 25161896
Sci Rep. 2018 May 18;8(1):7819
pubmed: 29777110
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2013 Mar 18;2013:21-5
pubmed: 24303289
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Apr;99:128-137
pubmed: 30615935
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 May;38(5):2370-2383
pubmed: 28150897
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Feb 19;12:28
pubmed: 32140102
iScience. 2019 Apr 26;14:226-240
pubmed: 30981959
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8
pubmed: 17182981
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 4;9(1):9676
pubmed: 31273275
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 12;34(11):3924-36
pubmed: 24623770
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):1812-22
pubmed: 20970508
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jun 18;19:990-999
pubmed: 30003036
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 May;68(5):1579-1588
pubmed: 33400645
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 May;27(5):2340-2353
pubmed: 29470170
Med Image Anal. 2016 Aug;32:84-100
pubmed: 27060621
Mol Neurobiol. 2018 Apr;55(4):3251-3269
pubmed: 28478510
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jan;12(1):56-68
pubmed: 21164525
Neuroimage Clin. 2012 Sep 23;1(1):91-8
pubmed: 24179741
Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Feb 14;14:3
pubmed: 32116582
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(6):785-93
pubmed: 26484693
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Nov;39(11):4404-4419
pubmed: 29956405
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Aug;177:277-283
pubmed: 31319956
Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Oct;13(5):1333-1351
pubmed: 30155788
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;49(8):907-16
pubmed: 8699212
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102208
pubmed: 32065968
J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 26;31(4):1204-12
pubmed: 21273405
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;41(3):449-455
pubmed: 32079601
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:380531
pubmed: 25309910
Biometrics. 2020 Sep;76(3):995-1006
pubmed: 31850527
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e019059
pubmed: 29358438
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep;129(9):1804-1812
pubmed: 29981955
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Nov;22(6):1895-1905
pubmed: 29990048
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 15;41(12):3468-3535
pubmed: 32374075
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Dec 15;35(24):2947-2956
pubmed: 30101641
Brain Struct Funct. 2014 Mar;219(2):641-56
pubmed: 23468090
Brain Connect. 2020 Mar;10(2):95-104
pubmed: 32079409
BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Dec 20;12(Suppl 8):179
pubmed: 31856825
Sci Rep. 2015 Jan 05;5:7622
pubmed: 25557398
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 26;9:608
pubmed: 30093879
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101712
pubmed: 30772684
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Apr;44(5):915-922
pubmed: 30679724
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 27;10:572
pubmed: 31555157
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 2;60(2):1352-66
pubmed: 22281673
Front Neurol. 2019 Jan 10;9:1178
pubmed: 30687226
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Jan;36 Suppl 1:S91-S102
pubmed: 25444603
Netw Neurosci. 2020 Jul 01;4(3):528-555
pubmed: 32885114
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Oct;131(10):2413-2422
pubmed: 32828045
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Dec 12;13:201-208
pubmed: 28003958
Mult Scler. 2019 Mar;25(3):382-391
pubmed: 29320933
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2045-56
pubmed: 22019883
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
BMC Med. 2013 Mar 20;11:77
pubmed: 23514382
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3166-3178
pubmed: 32401702
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 14;6:39243
pubmed: 27966645
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59764
pubmed: 23565166
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Sep 30;21(1):199
pubmed: 34592945
Epilepsia. 2015 Apr;56(4):517-26
pubmed: 25708625
Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 Dec 21;6:78
pubmed: 23267318
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Aug;39(8):3152-3165
pubmed: 29611297
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Dec 15;44(22):e164
pubmed: 27596597
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 30;8:70
pubmed: 18973665
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):4972-5
pubmed: 18362361
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1664-71
pubmed: 26457551
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Dec;50(12):3921-3933
pubmed: 31370107
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Jan;25(1):209-217
pubmed: 32248130
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jul;35(7):2876-97
pubmed: 24038749
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Jun;33(6):1393-406
pubmed: 21557387
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 30;10:904
pubmed: 31543860
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Jul 6;14(1):67
pubmed: 28683745
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58921
pubmed: 23536835
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 15;8:309
pubmed: 32351948
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6530
pubmed: 28747782
Transpl Int. 2017 Jan;30(1):6-10
pubmed: 27896874
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 12;9(6):e90405
pubmed: 24922325
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102325
pubmed: 32622317
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 02;10:552
pubmed: 27853427
NPJ Schizophr. 2017 May 16;3:22
pubmed: 28560268
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2132-41
pubmed: 25907414
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):613-622
pubmed: 29710118
Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;78(19):5538-5547
pubmed: 30275053
PeerJ. 2020 May 15;8:e9161
pubmed: 32461838
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Jan;61:198-206
pubmed: 29111486
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Jan;61:75-81
pubmed: 29040871
Biom J. 2018 May;60(3):431-449
pubmed: 29292533
Brain Connect. 2014 Jun;4(5):337-46
pubmed: 24735020
Brief Bioinform. 2021 May 20;22(3):
pubmed: 32422654
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0212901
pubmed: 30835738
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Feb;33(2):427.e15-30
pubmed: 21272960
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21935
pubmed: 21818280
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Mar;37(3):1194-208
pubmed: 26700243
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2010 Sep;117(9):1099-109
pubmed: 20714909

Auteurs

Mariella Gregorich (M)

Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Federico Melograna (F)

BIO3 Laboratory for Systems Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Martina Sunqvist (M)

Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.

Stefan Michiels (S)

Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.

Kristel Van Steen (K)

BIO3 Laboratory for Systems Medicine, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
BIO3 Laboratory for Systems Genetics, GIGA-R Medical Genomics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Georg Heinze (G)

Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. georg.heinze@meduniwien.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH