The effects of pelvic ring injuries on quality of life, physical, and mental health: results of a 2-year prospective cohort study.
EQ-5D
Mental health
Pelvic ring injury
Physical functioning
Quality of life
SMFA
Journal
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
ISSN: 1863-9941
Titre abrégé: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101313350
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
22
10
2021
accepted:
22
01
2022
pubmed:
8
3
2022
medline:
11
8
2022
entrez:
7
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pelvic ring injuries are known to affect the patients' daily life in terms of physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). Still, prospective studies on the patient's perception over the first 2 years of rehabilitation are lacking. Therefore, patients cannot be properly informed about whether or when they will return to their pre-existing level of physical functioning and QoL. A prospective longitudinal cohort study was performed over a 4-year period including all consecutive patients above 18 years who sustained a pelvic ring injury in a level 1 trauma center. Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to assess physical functioning (SMFA) and QoL (EQ-5D) at baseline (recalled pre-injury score), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the injury. It was assessed whether patients had fully recovered by comparing follow-up scores to baseline PROMs. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for patients who did not fully recover. Most experienced difficulties at 3 months and 1 year were identified by analyzing the highest reported scores on individual items of the SMFA. A total of 297 patients with a pelvic ring injury were identified of which 189 were eligible for follow-up and 154 (82%) responded. Median SMFA function score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 70, 78 and 88, respectively, compared to 96 out of 100 before the injury. Median SMFA bother score was 67, 79 and 88, respectively. Median EQ-5D score at 3 months, 1 and 2 years was 0.61, 0.81 and 0.85, respectively, compared to 1 (maximum achievable) before the injury. After 1 and 2 years of follow-up, 61% and 75% of the patients fully "recovered" in physical functioning and 52% and 71% fully recovered in terms of QoL. Female gender and high-energy trauma were independent predictors for not fully recovering after 1 year. After 3 months of follow-up, 54% of patients reported severe difficulties with recreational activities, whereas after 1 year, most experienced difficulties (31% of patients) concerned heavy house or yard work. Moreover, after 3 months and 1 year, 44% and 27% of patients reported feeling physically disabled. Pelvic ring injuries have a large impact on the patients' daily life in the first 2 years of rehabilitation. Directly after the injury, physical functioning and QoL decrease strongly but then gradually improve over a 2-year period with about 75% of patients fully recovering. Female gender and high-energy trauma are shown to be independent predictors for not fully recovering. After 3 months, patients experience difficulties with both the physical and mental effects of the injury which continue to be present after 1 year.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35254459
doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3
pii: 10.1007/s00068-022-01893-3
pmc: PMC9360067
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2849-2857Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Jun;25(2):387-93
pubmed: 25261389
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499016684322
pubmed: 28142352
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec;28(12):686-93
pubmed: 25250611
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):128-36
pubmed: 20093984
J Trauma. 2007 Jan;62(1):133-41
pubmed: 17215744
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Feb;28(2):197-205
pubmed: 28993913
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Sep;81(9):1245-60
pubmed: 10505521
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(5):896-899
pubmed: 31528064
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0233690
pubmed: 32525901
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):726-33
pubmed: 21851940
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52
pubmed: 27325326
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Sep;139(9):1225-1233
pubmed: 30976900
J Trauma. 2004 Feb;56(2):284-90
pubmed: 14960969
Am J Surg. 2014 Dec;208(6):1083-90; discussion 1089-90
pubmed: 25440492
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0233226
pubmed: 32678840
Injury. 2007 Apr;38(4):416-23
pubmed: 17397843
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2841-5
pubmed: 23408176
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2161-72
pubmed: 22278851
Clin Rehabil. 2019 May;33(5):923-935
pubmed: 30722686