Lessons for Uptake and Engagement of a Smartphone App (SURE Recovery) for People in Recovery From Alcohol and Other Drug Problems: Interview Study of App Users.
apps
digital literacy
mHealth
mobile phone
qualitative
recovery
substance use
Journal
JMIR human factors
ISSN: 2292-9495
Titre abrégé: JMIR Hum Factors
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666561
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Mar 2022
08 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
23
08
2021
accepted:
19
12
2021
revised:
25
11
2021
entrez:
8
3
2022
pubmed:
9
3
2022
medline:
9
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mobile health apps promoting health and well-being have substantial potential but low uptake and engagement. Barriers common to addiction treatment app uptake and engagement include poor access to mobile technology, Wi-Fi, or mobile data, plus low motivation among non-treatment-seeking users to cut down or quit. Working with people who used substances, we had previously designed and published an app to support recovery from alcohol and other drug problems. The app, which is available for free from the Apple App Store and Google Play, is called SURE Recovery. The aim of this paper is to undertake a qualitative study to ascertain end users' views and experiences of the SURE Recovery app, including how it might be improved, and present the findings on uptake and engagement to assist other researchers and app developers working on similar apps for people experiencing alcohol and other drug problems. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 people (n=12, 60%, men and n=8, 40%, women aged 25-63 years; all identifying as White British) who had varied patterns of using the app. The audio recordings were transcribed, and the data were coded and analyzed through Iterative Categorization. Analyses identified three main factors relevant to uptake (discoverability of the app, personal relevance, and expectations and motivations) and three main factors relevant to engagement (the appeal and relevance of specific features, perceived benefits, and the need for improvements). The findings on uptake and engagement were largely consistent with our own earlier developmental work and with other published literature. However, we additionally found that uptake was strongly affected by first impressions, including trust and personal recommendations; that users were attracted to the app by their need for support and curiosity but had relatively modest expectations; that engagement increased if the app made users feel positive; and that people were unlikely to download, or engage with, the app if they could not relate to, or identify with, aspects of its content. Incorporating end-user views into app design and having a network of supportive partners (ie, credible organizations and individuals who will champion the app) seem to increase uptake and engagement among people experiencing alcohol and other drug problems. Although better digital literacy and access to devices and mobile data are needed if addiction recovery apps are to reach their full potential, we should not evaluate them based only on observable changes in substance use behaviors. How using an app makes a person feel is more transient and difficult to quantify but also relevant to uptake and engagement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mobile health apps promoting health and well-being have substantial potential but low uptake and engagement. Barriers common to addiction treatment app uptake and engagement include poor access to mobile technology, Wi-Fi, or mobile data, plus low motivation among non-treatment-seeking users to cut down or quit. Working with people who used substances, we had previously designed and published an app to support recovery from alcohol and other drug problems. The app, which is available for free from the Apple App Store and Google Play, is called SURE Recovery.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this paper is to undertake a qualitative study to ascertain end users' views and experiences of the SURE Recovery app, including how it might be improved, and present the findings on uptake and engagement to assist other researchers and app developers working on similar apps for people experiencing alcohol and other drug problems.
METHODS
METHODS
Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 people (n=12, 60%, men and n=8, 40%, women aged 25-63 years; all identifying as White British) who had varied patterns of using the app. The audio recordings were transcribed, and the data were coded and analyzed through Iterative Categorization.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Analyses identified three main factors relevant to uptake (discoverability of the app, personal relevance, and expectations and motivations) and three main factors relevant to engagement (the appeal and relevance of specific features, perceived benefits, and the need for improvements). The findings on uptake and engagement were largely consistent with our own earlier developmental work and with other published literature. However, we additionally found that uptake was strongly affected by first impressions, including trust and personal recommendations; that users were attracted to the app by their need for support and curiosity but had relatively modest expectations; that engagement increased if the app made users feel positive; and that people were unlikely to download, or engage with, the app if they could not relate to, or identify with, aspects of its content.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Incorporating end-user views into app design and having a network of supportive partners (ie, credible organizations and individuals who will champion the app) seem to increase uptake and engagement among people experiencing alcohol and other drug problems. Although better digital literacy and access to devices and mobile data are needed if addiction recovery apps are to reach their full potential, we should not evaluate them based only on observable changes in substance use behaviors. How using an app makes a person feel is more transient and difficult to quantify but also relevant to uptake and engagement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35258474
pii: v9i1e33038
doi: 10.2196/33038
pmc: PMC8941437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e33038Informations de copyright
©Joanne Neale, Alice May Bowen. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.03.2022.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 18;17(8):e201
pubmed: 26286257
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 22;7(4):e11831
pubmed: 31008713
Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(6):329-338
pubmed: 27598779
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):1096-106
pubmed: 26806155
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572
pubmed: 32348255
J Stud Alcohol. 1997 Jul;58(4):365-71
pubmed: 9203117
Addiction. 2021 Mar;116(3):668-676
pubmed: 32926762
J Addict Dis. 2012;31(3):313-8
pubmed: 22873192
Sleep. 2018 Apr 1;41(4):
pubmed: 29329423
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Aug 01;165:159-67
pubmed: 27344196
Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;101:106144
pubmed: 31648139
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Nov;82:67-73
pubmed: 29021117
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Aug 12;3(3):e81
pubmed: 26268634
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 21;6(11):e10442
pubmed: 30463834
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jan 1;146:111-5
pubmed: 25468818
Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Sep;49(11):1465-72
pubmed: 24799073
Adv Health Care Technol. 2015;1:47-54
pubmed: 27478863
J Addict Dis. 2013;32(3):310-9
pubmed: 24074196
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 18;12:677637
pubmed: 34220583
Addict Behav. 1993 May-Jun;18(3):347-53
pubmed: 8393611
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267
pubmed: 27966189
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87
pubmed: 18624603
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997 Mar-Apr;14(2):183-90
pubmed: 9258863
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27
pubmed: 25760773
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 14;12(1):131
pubmed: 29137660