Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for locally advanced T4 colonic cancer: meta-analysis of clinical and oncological outcomes.


Journal

The British journal of surgery
ISSN: 1365-2168
Titre abrégé: Br J Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372553

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 03 2022
Historique:
received: 17 07 2021
revised: 11 10 2021
accepted: 17 12 2021
pubmed: 9 3 2022
medline: 29 4 2022
entrez: 8 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to review the early postoperative and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy for T4 cancer compared with open surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for any relevant clinical study comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy as treatment for T4 colonic cancer. The risk ratio (RR) with 95 per cent c.i. was calculated for dichotomous variables, and the mean difference (m.d.) with 95 per cent confidence interval for continuous variables. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was implemented for assessing quality of evidence (QoE). Twenty-four observational studies (21 retrospective and 3 prospective cohort studies) were included, analysing a total of 18 123 patients: 9024 received laparoscopic colectomy and 9099 underwent open surgery. Laparoscopic colectomy was associated with lower rates of mortality (RR 0.48, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 0.56; P < 0.001; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE moderate) and complications (RR 0.61, 0.49 to 0.76; P < 0.001; I2 = 20 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) compared with an open procedure. No differences in R0 resection rate (RR 1.01, 1.00 to 1.03; P = 0.12; I2 = 37 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) and recurrence rate (RR 0.98, 0.84 to 1.14; P = 0.81; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE very low) were found. Laparoscopic colectomy for T4 colonic cancer is safe, and is associated with better clinical outcomes than open surgery and similar oncological outcomes. Colonic cancer is a common condition, and in 10-20 per cent of patients the tumour has grown beyond the bowel wall or invaded other organs at diagnosis (called locally advanced colonic cancer). This study reviews the use of laparoscopic (minimally invasive surgery or keyhole surgery) to treat these locally advanced tumours. Medical databases were searched for research publications on the subject. In total, 24 studies (including data on 18 123 patients) comparing laparoscopic with traditional open surgery were identified. Analysing the data of the studies together found that laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rates of mortality and surgical complications. No difference in survival or cancer recurrence was found.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to review the early postoperative and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy for T4 cancer compared with open surgery.
METHOD
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for any relevant clinical study comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy as treatment for T4 colonic cancer. The risk ratio (RR) with 95 per cent c.i. was calculated for dichotomous variables, and the mean difference (m.d.) with 95 per cent confidence interval for continuous variables. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was implemented for assessing quality of evidence (QoE).
RESULTS
Twenty-four observational studies (21 retrospective and 3 prospective cohort studies) were included, analysing a total of 18 123 patients: 9024 received laparoscopic colectomy and 9099 underwent open surgery. Laparoscopic colectomy was associated with lower rates of mortality (RR 0.48, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 0.56; P < 0.001; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE moderate) and complications (RR 0.61, 0.49 to 0.76; P < 0.001; I2 = 20 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) compared with an open procedure. No differences in R0 resection rate (RR 1.01, 1.00 to 1.03; P = 0.12; I2 = 37 per cent, random-effects model; QoE very low) and recurrence rate (RR 0.98, 0.84 to 1.14; P = 0.81; I2 = 0 per cent, fixed-effect model; QoE very low) were found.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic colectomy for T4 colonic cancer is safe, and is associated with better clinical outcomes than open surgery and similar oncological outcomes.
Colonic cancer is a common condition, and in 10-20 per cent of patients the tumour has grown beyond the bowel wall or invaded other organs at diagnosis (called locally advanced colonic cancer). This study reviews the use of laparoscopic (minimally invasive surgery or keyhole surgery) to treat these locally advanced tumours. Medical databases were searched for research publications on the subject. In total, 24 studies (including data on 18 123 patients) comparing laparoscopic with traditional open surgery were identified. Analysing the data of the studies together found that laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rates of mortality and surgical complications. No difference in survival or cancer recurrence was found.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Colonic cancer is a common condition, and in 10-20 per cent of patients the tumour has grown beyond the bowel wall or invaded other organs at diagnosis (called locally advanced colonic cancer). This study reviews the use of laparoscopic (minimally invasive surgery or keyhole surgery) to treat these locally advanced tumours. Medical databases were searched for research publications on the subject. In total, 24 studies (including data on 18 123 patients) comparing laparoscopic with traditional open surgery were identified. Analysing the data of the studies together found that laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rates of mortality and surgical complications. No difference in survival or cancer recurrence was found.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35259211
pii: 6544834
doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab464
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

319-331

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Mauro Podda (M)

Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital 'D. Casula', Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Adolfo Pisanu (A)

Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital 'D. Casula', Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Alessia Morello (A)

Department of Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Crema, Italy.
Department of Surgery, San Matteo Hospital, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Edoardo Segalini (E)

Department of Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Crema, Italy.

Kumar Jayant (K)

Department of Surgery, Chicago University Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Gaetano Gallo (G)

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

Massimo Sartelli (M)

Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Macerata General Hospital, Macerata, Italy.

Federico Coccolini (F)

Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.

Fausto Catena (F)

Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.

Salomone Di Saverio (S)

Department of Surgery, Madonna del Soccorso General Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH