Incremental Versus Immediate Induction of Hypertension in the Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.


Journal

Neurocritical care
ISSN: 1556-0961
Titre abrégé: Neurocrit Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101156086

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 10 11 2021
accepted: 14 01 2022
pubmed: 10 3 2022
medline: 20 5 2022
entrez: 9 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and contributes to unfavorable outcome. In patients with deterioration despite prophylactic nimodipine treatment, induced hypertension (iHTN) can be considered, although the safety and efficacy of induction are still a matter of debate. In this study, two iHTN treatment algorithms were compared with different approaches toward setting pressure targets. In a cohort of 325 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 139 patients were treated by induced hypertension as a first tier treatment. On diagnosing DCI, blood pressure was raised via norepinephrine infusion in 20-mm Hg increments in 37 patients (iHTN The rate of refractory DCI requiring additional rescue therapy was comparable in both groups (48.9% in iHTN Immediate induction of hypertension with higher pressure targets did not result in a lower rate of DCI-related infarctions but was not associated with a higher complication rate compared with an incremental approach. Future tailored blood pressure management based on patient- and time-point-specific needs will hopefully better balance the neurological advantages versus the systemic complications of induced hypertension.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and contributes to unfavorable outcome. In patients with deterioration despite prophylactic nimodipine treatment, induced hypertension (iHTN) can be considered, although the safety and efficacy of induction are still a matter of debate. In this study, two iHTN treatment algorithms were compared with different approaches toward setting pressure targets.
METHODS
In a cohort of 325 consecutive patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 139 patients were treated by induced hypertension as a first tier treatment. On diagnosing DCI, blood pressure was raised via norepinephrine infusion in 20-mm Hg increments in 37 patients (iHTN
RESULTS
The rate of refractory DCI requiring additional rescue therapy was comparable in both groups (48.9% in iHTN
CONCLUSIONS
Immediate induction of hypertension with higher pressure targets did not result in a lower rate of DCI-related infarctions but was not associated with a higher complication rate compared with an incremental approach. Future tailored blood pressure management based on patient- and time-point-specific needs will hopefully better balance the neurological advantages versus the systemic complications of induced hypertension.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35260962
doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01466-7
pii: 10.1007/s12028-022-01466-7
pmc: PMC9110507
doi:

Substances chimiques

Vasoconstrictor Agents 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02142166']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

702-714

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Long-term outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:349–56.
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70017-5
de Rooij NK, Linn FH, van der Plas JA, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Incidence of subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review with emphasis on region, age, gender and time trends. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:1365–72.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.117655
Dodel R, Winter Y, Ringel F, et al. Cost of illness in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a German longitudinal study. Stroke. 2010;41:2918–23.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.586826
Vergouwen MD, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J, et al. Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke. 2010;41:2391–5.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589275
Rass V, Helbok R. Early brain injury after poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019;19:78.
doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0990-3
Tso MK, Macdonald RL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage: a review of experimental studies on the microcirculation and the neurovascular unit. Transl Stroke Res. 2014;5:174–89.
doi: 10.1007/s12975-014-0323-4
Balbi M, Koide M, Schwarzmaier SM, Wellman GC, Plesnila N. Acute changes in neurovascular reactivity after subarachnoid hemorrhage in vivo. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:178–87.
doi: 10.1177/0271678X15621253
Veldeman M, Albanna W, Weiss M, et al. Invasive neuromonitoring with an extended definition of delayed cerebral ischemia is associated with improved outcome after poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2020;134:1527–34.
doi: 10.3171/2020.3.JNS20375
Veldeman M, Albanna W, Weiss M, et al. Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Good-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Any Role for Invasive Neuromonitoring? Neurocrit Care. 2020;35:172–83.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01169-x
Dankbaar JW, Slooter AJ, Rinkel GJ, Schaaf IC. Effect of different components of triple-H therapy on cerebral perfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2010;14:R23.
doi: 10.1186/cc8886
Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council. Am Heart Assoc Stroke. 2009;40:994–1025.
Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Claude Hemphill J, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s multidisciplinary consensus conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:211–40.
doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9605-9
Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–37.
doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839
Steiner T, Juvela S, Unterberg A, Jung C, Forsting M, Rinkel G. European Stroke Organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35:93–112.
doi: 10.1159/000346087
Angermann M, Jablawi F, Keulers A, et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after induced hypertension therapy for delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A case-control study. J Neurol Sci. 2021;421:117313.
doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117313
Gathier CS, van den Bergh WM, Slooter AJ. HIMALAIA (Hypertension Induction in the Management of AneurysmaL subArachnoid haemorrhage with secondary IschaemiA): a randomized single-blind controlled trial of induced hypertension vs. no induced hypertension in the treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:375–80.
doi: 10.1111/ijs.12055
Gathier CS, Dankbaar JW, van der Jagt M, et al. Effects of induced hypertension on cerebral perfusion in delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2015;46:3277–81.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010537
Gathier CS, van den Bergh WM, van der Jagt M, et al. Induced hypertension for delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2018;49:76–83.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017956
Haegens NM, Gathier CS, Horn J, Coert BA, Verbaan D, van den Bergh WM. Induced hypertension in preventing cerebral infarction in delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2018;49:2630–6.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022310
de Winkel J, van der Jagt M, Lingsma HF, et al. International practice variability in treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Med. 2021;10:762.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10040762

Auteurs

Michael Veldeman (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. mveldeman@ukaachen.de.

Miriam Weiss (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Walid Albanna (W)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Omid Nikoubashman (O)

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Henna Schulze-Steinen (H)

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Hans Clusmann (H)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Anke Hoellig (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Gerrit Alexander Schubert (GA)

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH