Fluvoxamine for the Early Treatment of COVID-19: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.


Journal

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene
ISSN: 1476-1645
Titre abrégé: Am J Trop Med Hyg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370507

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 20 12 2021
accepted: 21 01 2022
pubmed: 10 3 2022
medline: 10 3 2022
entrez: 9 3 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Fluvoxamine is widely prescribed as an antidepressant. Recent studies show the drug may have a clinical benefit in treating COVID-19. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the existing randomized trials of fluvoxamine compared with placebo on the early treatment of COVID-19 patients. We included only randomized clinical trials enrolling ambulatory patients with early-stage disease (symptoms > 7 days) for the prevention of hospitalization. We searched MEDLINE, and clinicaltrials.gov databases to identify trials and extract data with clarifications from the study investigators. We performed a fixed-effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analyses via R to evaluate the pooled estimate of hospitalization. We included three randomized trials: STOP COVID 1 and 2, and the TOGETHER Trial. The studies included a total of 2,196 patients. The STOP COVID trials measured clinical deterioration whereas the TOGETHER Trial measured hospitalization as the primary outcome. All trials reported on hospitalization up to day 28. The meta-analysis results show that patients receiving fluvoxamine were 31% less likely to experience clinical deterioration or hospitalization compared with placebo (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88). A sensitivity analysis using the definition of hospitalization resulted in a risk reduction of 21% (95% CI, 0.60-1.03). Data from three randomized controlled trials show that fluvoxamine was associated with a reduction in the primary outcome measure (either clinical deterioration or composite outcome of hospitalization or extended emergency setting observation), although analysis of hospitalization-only was not statistically significant. More evidence from future trials is still needed to support the findings of this meta-analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35263710
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1310
pii: tpmd211310
pmc: PMC9128689
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):922-923
pubmed: 34174236
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2292-2300
pubmed: 33180097
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133090
pubmed: 34779847
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 20;12:652688
pubmed: 33959018
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Feb 6;11(478):
pubmed: 30728287
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2136510
pubmed: 34779851
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1991 Jul;16(2 Suppl 1):19-25
pubmed: 1931932
Cell. 2007 Nov 2;131(3):596-610
pubmed: 17981125
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e42-e51
pubmed: 34717820
Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Dec;9(4):715-720
pubmed: 33051827

Auteurs

Christina M Guo (CM)

Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.

Ofir Harari (O)

Cytel Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Cameron Chernecki (C)

Cytel Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Kristian Thorlund (K)

Cytel Inc., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Jamie I Forrest (JI)

School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Classifications MeSH