Methodological issues on "Stakeholder attitudes to the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine professions: a systematic review".
Persian medicine
Stakeholders
Systematic review
Traditional and complementary medicine
Uyghur medicine
Journal
Human resources for health
ISSN: 1478-4491
Titre abrégé: Hum Resour Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 03 2022
09 03 2022
Historique:
received:
04
08
2021
accepted:
14
02
2022
entrez:
10
3
2022
pubmed:
11
3
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews cling to the doctrine that science has an updating databank and attempt to identify all available evidence by featured eligibility criteria to find the answer to a unique scientific question. Therefore, to reach this aim, these researches should use a wise method and comprehensive search strategy, as they are widely used to guide clinical and political decisions and the establishment of future researches. We would like to appreciate Jenny Carè, Amie Steel, and Jon Wardle for the valuable article "Stakeholder attitudes to the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine professions: a systematic review". Some important missed search terms in the field of traditional medicine names and traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) regulation concepts were discussed in the article.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35264174
doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00718-z
pii: 10.1186/s12960-022-00718-z
pmc: PMC8905999
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Altern Ther Health Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):34-41
pubmed: 28646808
Health Inf Manag. 2021 Sep;50(3):128-139
pubmed: 31500451
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Nov 29;8:221
pubmed: 31867385
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Mar 29;19(1):42
pubmed: 33781297