Transfer Learning Approaches for Neuroimaging Analysis: A Scoping Review.
convolutional neural network
domain adaptation
fine tuning
medical imaging
neuroimaging
transfer learning
Journal
Frontiers in artificial intelligence
ISSN: 2624-8212
Titre abrégé: Front Artif Intell
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101770551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
09
2021
accepted:
17
01
2022
entrez:
10
3
2022
pubmed:
11
3
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deep learning algorithms have been moderately successful in diagnoses of diseases by analyzing medical images especially through neuroimaging that is rich in annotated data. Transfer learning methods have demonstrated strong performance in tackling annotated data. It utilizes and transfers knowledge learned from a source domain to target domain even when the dataset is small. There are multiple approaches to transfer learning that result in a range of performance estimates in diagnosis, detection, and classification of clinical problems. Therefore, in this paper, we reviewed transfer learning approaches, their design attributes, and their applications to neuroimaging problems. We reviewed two main literature databases and included the most relevant studies using predefined inclusion criteria. Among 50 reviewed studies, more than half of them are on transfer learning for Alzheimer's disease. Brain mapping and brain tumor detection were second and third most discussed research problems, respectively. The most common source dataset for transfer learning was ImageNet, which is not a neuroimaging dataset. This suggests that the majority of studies preferred pre-trained models instead of training their own model on a neuroimaging dataset. Although, about one third of studies designed their own architecture, most studies used existing Convolutional Neural Network architectures. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was the most common imaging modality. In almost all studies, transfer learning contributed to better performance in diagnosis, classification, segmentation of different neuroimaging diseases and problems, than methods without transfer learning. Among different transfer learning approaches, fine-tuning all convolutional and fully-connected layers approach and freezing convolutional layers and fine-tuning fully-connected layers approach demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy. These recent transfer learning approaches not only show great performance but also require less computational resources and time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35265830
doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.780405
pmc: PMC8899512
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
780405Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Ardalan and Subbian.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Aug;33(8):1564-78
pubmed: 21813210
Neuroscience. 2021 Apr 15;460:43-52
pubmed: 33465405
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Oct;77:101647
pubmed: 31493703
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 26;13:1275
pubmed: 31849587
Ann Nucl Med. 2021 Aug;35(8):889-899
pubmed: 34076857
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Feb;47(2):403-412
pubmed: 31768599
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 May 14;13(1):e12140
pubmed: 34027015
Neurobiol Aging. 2021 Mar;99:53-64
pubmed: 33422894
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jan;38(1):213-224
pubmed: 30047874
Nutrients. 2013 Nov 15;5(11):4521-39
pubmed: 24248213
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2002 Nov;12(4):615-26
pubmed: 12687915
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Apr;131:104254
pubmed: 33618105
Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar;43(3):1721-1739
pubmed: 34510292
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18150
pubmed: 31796817
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 26;13(9):
pubmed: 33926002
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101929
pubmed: 31491832
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Nov 6;:
pubmed: 34741576
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 May;203:106032
pubmed: 33713959
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jun;51(6):1044-51
pubmed: 15188876
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(2):647-663
pubmed: 33579839
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jul;89:177-198
pubmed: 34119265
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:102003
pubmed: 31634822
Hum Brain Artif Intell (2019). 2019;1072:21-35
pubmed: 33907742
J Med Syst. 2019 Oct 23;43(11):326
pubmed: 31643004
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 May 25;7:e560
pubmed: 34141888
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Dec;78:101673
pubmed: 31635910
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e86333
pubmed: 24466032
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;31:102769
pubmed: 34333270
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Sep 28;10:737-749
pubmed: 30480079
Sci Data. 2017 Sep 05;4:170117
pubmed: 28872634
Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;19(6):659-67
pubmed: 23774715
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Apr;187:105242
pubmed: 31837630
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Dec 18;:
pubmed: 34929344
Neuroinformatics. 2017 Apr;15(2):115-132
pubmed: 27928657
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 31;21(21):
pubmed: 34770565
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 24;12:491
pubmed: 30087587
Genes (Basel). 2018 Jul 30;9(8):
pubmed: 30061525
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104678
pubmed: 34329864
Curr Med Imaging. 2021;17(12):1460-1472
pubmed: 33504310
J Med Syst. 2019 Dec 18;44(2):37
pubmed: 31853655
Med Image Anal. 2018 Oct;49:105-116
pubmed: 30119038
Med Image Anal. 2022 Jan;75:102266
pubmed: 34700245
Front Neurosci. 2012 Oct 16;6:152
pubmed: 23087608
Neuroimage. 2021 Jul 15;235:118001
pubmed: 33789137
Neuroinformatics. 2021 Nov 11;:
pubmed: 34761367
Alzheimers Dement. 2010 May;6(3):265-73
pubmed: 20451875
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Apr 1;43(5):1640-1656
pubmed: 34913545
Med Phys. 2017 Apr;44(4):1408-1419
pubmed: 28192624
Gigascience. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):
pubmed: 30395218
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 11;10:205
pubmed: 31031657