Prediction of premature ventricular complex origins using artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms.
Artificial intelligence
Convolutional neural network
Electrocardiogram
Machine learning
Premature ventricular complex
Support vector machine
Journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal
ISSN: 2666-6936
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Digit Health J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101771268
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
entrez:
10
3
2022
pubmed:
28
11
2020
medline:
28
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Catheter ablation is a standard therapy for frequent premature ventricular complex (PVCs). Predicting their origin from a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is crucial but it requires specialized knowledge and experience. The objective of the present study was to develop and evaluate machine learning algorithms that predicted PVC origins from an ECG. We developed the algorithms utilizing a support vector machine (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The training, validating, and testing data consisted of 116 PVCs from 111 patients who underwent catheter ablation. The ECG signals were labeled with the PVC origin, which was confirmed using a 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system. We classified the origins into 4 groups: right or left, outflow tract, or other sites. We trained and evaluated the model performance. The testing datasets were also evaluated by board-certified electrophysiologists and an existing classification algorithm. We also developed binary classification models that predicted whether the origin was on the right or left side of the heart. The weighted accuracies of the 4-class classification were as follows: SVM 0.85, CNN 0.80, electrophysiologists 0.73, and existing algorithm 0.86. The precision, recall, and F Artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms that predict the origin of PVCs achieved superior accuracy compared to the electrophysiologists and comparable accuracy to the existing algorithm.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Catheter ablation is a standard therapy for frequent premature ventricular complex (PVCs). Predicting their origin from a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is crucial but it requires specialized knowledge and experience.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
The objective of the present study was to develop and evaluate machine learning algorithms that predicted PVC origins from an ECG.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We developed the algorithms utilizing a support vector machine (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN). The training, validating, and testing data consisted of 116 PVCs from 111 patients who underwent catheter ablation. The ECG signals were labeled with the PVC origin, which was confirmed using a 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system. We classified the origins into 4 groups: right or left, outflow tract, or other sites. We trained and evaluated the model performance. The testing datasets were also evaluated by board-certified electrophysiologists and an existing classification algorithm. We also developed binary classification models that predicted whether the origin was on the right or left side of the heart.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The weighted accuracies of the 4-class classification were as follows: SVM 0.85, CNN 0.80, electrophysiologists 0.73, and existing algorithm 0.86. The precision, recall, and F
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms that predict the origin of PVCs achieved superior accuracy compared to the electrophysiologists and comparable accuracy to the existing algorithm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35265893
doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.11.006
pii: S2666-6936(20)30061-X
pmc: PMC8890345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
76-83Informations de copyright
© 2020 Heart Rhythm Society.
Références
Circulation. 2017 Feb 28;135(9):867-877
pubmed: 28119381
Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jul;7(7):865-9
pubmed: 20348027
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):72-7
pubmed: 26325532
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Oct;16(10):1057-63
pubmed: 16191115
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-69
pubmed: 30617320
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1408-14
pubmed: 11300454
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Oct;9(10):
pubmed: 27729345
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Jan;37(1):94-104
pubmed: 32585216
Circulation. 2005 Aug 23;112(8):1092-7
pubmed: 16103234
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jul;3(7):687-699
pubmed: 29759537
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 19;45(8):1259-65
pubmed: 15837259
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Mar;9(3):330-4
pubmed: 22001707
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):311-318
pubmed: 32613401
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):861-867
pubmed: 31378392
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235574
pubmed: 32614911
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jul;4(7):863-7
pubmed: 17599667
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):e2-e154
pubmed: 31085023
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Oct;16(10):1538-1544
pubmed: 30954600
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):722-733
pubmed: 32081280
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Jan;14(1):141-148
pubmed: 27664373
Circulation. 2020 Apr 28;141(17):1404-1418
pubmed: 32339046