Adherence to emerging plant-based dietary patterns and its association with cardiovascular disease risk in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults.
a priori methods
cardiovascular disease (CVD)
dietary index
dietary patterns
guidelines
incidence
mortality
plant-based diet
reliability
validity
Journal
The American journal of clinical nutrition
ISSN: 1938-3207
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376027
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 07 2022
06 07 2022
Historique:
received:
03
12
2021
accepted:
07
03
2022
pubmed:
11
3
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
entrez:
10
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Little is known about the role of emerging plant-based dietary patterns in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk at the national population level. The objectives of this research were to assess the validity and reliability of newly established plant-based dietary indices, and to evaluate their associations with CVD risk among Canadian adults. Data were obtained from repeated 24-h dietary recalls of adult participants in the cross-sectional, nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey cycle 2004 linked to health administrative databases (n = 12,323) and cycle 2015 (n = 14,026). Plant-based diet quality was assessed with a revised Plant-based Dietary Index (PDI), EAT-Lancet Reference Diet (ERD) score, and the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index (DGAI) 2020. Weighted multivariate analyses were used for testing associations between diet quality and lifestyle characteristics, and weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for associations with CVD risk. Construct validity was confirmed for the revised PDI and DGAI 2020 (but not the ERD) because participants in the highest (healthiest) quartile, compared to those in the lowest (least healthy), were more likely to be female (mean ± SE: 52.63% ± 1.27% compared with 44.80% ± 1.65% for revised PDI; 59.37% ± 2.01% compared with 40.84% ± 1.71% for DGAI 2020), older (mean ± SE: 50.55 ± 0.39 y compared with 45.56 ± 0.43 y for revised PDI; 51.57 ± 0.39 y compared with 46.35 ± 0.54 y for DGAI 2020), to have postsecondary education (mean ± SE: 32.36% ± 1.55% compared with 21.12% ± 1.31% for revised PDI; 34.17% ± 2.69% compared with 17.87% ± 0.98% for DGAI 2020), and less likely to be daily smokers (mean ± SE: 8.21% ± 1.0% compared with 17.06% ± 1.45% for revised PDI; 7.36% ± 1.71% compared with 21.53% ± 1.58% for DGAI 2020) (P-trend < 0.0001). No significant associations were observed between dietary index scores and CVD risk. The revised PDI and DGAI 2020 provided valid and meaningful measures of plant-based eating among Canadians, whereas the validity of the ERD was not directly confirmed. Adherence to the plant-based dietary patterns was not associated with CVD risk. Future large-scale studies are necessary to further evaluate the role of plant-based eating in CVD prevention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Little is known about the role of emerging plant-based dietary patterns in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk at the national population level.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this research were to assess the validity and reliability of newly established plant-based dietary indices, and to evaluate their associations with CVD risk among Canadian adults.
METHODS
Data were obtained from repeated 24-h dietary recalls of adult participants in the cross-sectional, nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey cycle 2004 linked to health administrative databases (n = 12,323) and cycle 2015 (n = 14,026). Plant-based diet quality was assessed with a revised Plant-based Dietary Index (PDI), EAT-Lancet Reference Diet (ERD) score, and the latest Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index (DGAI) 2020. Weighted multivariate analyses were used for testing associations between diet quality and lifestyle characteristics, and weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models for associations with CVD risk.
RESULTS
Construct validity was confirmed for the revised PDI and DGAI 2020 (but not the ERD) because participants in the highest (healthiest) quartile, compared to those in the lowest (least healthy), were more likely to be female (mean ± SE: 52.63% ± 1.27% compared with 44.80% ± 1.65% for revised PDI; 59.37% ± 2.01% compared with 40.84% ± 1.71% for DGAI 2020), older (mean ± SE: 50.55 ± 0.39 y compared with 45.56 ± 0.43 y for revised PDI; 51.57 ± 0.39 y compared with 46.35 ± 0.54 y for DGAI 2020), to have postsecondary education (mean ± SE: 32.36% ± 1.55% compared with 21.12% ± 1.31% for revised PDI; 34.17% ± 2.69% compared with 17.87% ± 0.98% for DGAI 2020), and less likely to be daily smokers (mean ± SE: 8.21% ± 1.0% compared with 17.06% ± 1.45% for revised PDI; 7.36% ± 1.71% compared with 21.53% ± 1.58% for DGAI 2020) (P-trend < 0.0001). No significant associations were observed between dietary index scores and CVD risk.
CONCLUSIONS
The revised PDI and DGAI 2020 provided valid and meaningful measures of plant-based eating among Canadians, whereas the validity of the ERD was not directly confirmed. Adherence to the plant-based dietary patterns was not associated with CVD risk. Future large-scale studies are necessary to further evaluate the role of plant-based eating in CVD prevention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35265975
pii: S0002-9165(22)00010-7
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac062
pmc: PMC9257478
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
57-73Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.
Références
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan;118(1):62-73.e4
pubmed: 28479136
Am J Med. 2021 Apr;134(4):490-498.e24
pubmed: 32941845
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):1193-201
pubmed: 17921402
Health Rep. 2011 Sep;22(3):35-45
pubmed: 22106788
J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):273-8
pubmed: 15671225
J Nutr. 2004 Jul;134(7):1793-9
pubmed: 15226471
Br J Nutr. 2021 Jun 28;125(12):1405-1415
pubmed: 32943123
Adv Nutr. 2019 Nov 1;10(Suppl_4):S404-S421
pubmed: 31728499
Health Rep. 2018 May 16;29(5):3-12
pubmed: 29852052
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jan 14;115(1):147-59
pubmed: 26522666
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jul 25;70(4):411-422
pubmed: 28728684
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Jun;5(3):497-503
pubmed: 12003663
Stat Med. 2010 Nov 30;29(27):2857-68
pubmed: 20862656
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 14;13(6):e1002039
pubmed: 27299701
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1090-1100
pubmed: 32539102
Nutrients. 2021 May 02;13(5):
pubmed: 34063221
Obes Rev. 2009 Nov;10(6):681-92
pubmed: 19413706
Nutrients. 2014 May 08;6(5):1899-912
pubmed: 24815507
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1609-16
pubmed: 18695074
Nutrition. 2013 Apr;29(4):611-8
pubmed: 23466047
Nutrition. 2011 Jan;27(1):59-64
pubmed: 20541365
Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2281-3
pubmed: 18835944
CMAJ. 2018 Jul 23;190(29):E871-E882
pubmed: 30037888
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100 Suppl 1:320S-8S
pubmed: 24871477
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972
pubmed: 30954305
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1617-24
pubmed: 18695075
Health Rep. 2008 Dec;19(4):47-55
pubmed: 19226927
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Mar;106(3):393-402
pubmed: 16503230
J Nutr. 2020 Feb 1;150(2):312-321
pubmed: 31529069
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jan;118(1):74-100.e11
pubmed: 29111090
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):5-56
pubmed: 12081815
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):213-214
pubmed: 31235280
J Nutr. 2018 Apr 1;148(4):624-631
pubmed: 29659968
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:317-324
pubmed: 30468792
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1378-1392
pubmed: 27680992
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e59-e66
pubmed: 31708415
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3 Suppl):544S-551S
pubmed: 12936948
Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Jul 1;112(1):220-228
pubmed: 32401300
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492
pubmed: 30660336
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Apr;103(4):483-7
pubmed: 12669012
J Nutr. 2020 Apr 1;150(4):842-850
pubmed: 31722418
Epidemiology. 2019 Mar;30(2):303-310
pubmed: 30507650
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;180(9):1173-1184
pubmed: 32658243
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):230-7
pubmed: 18574045
J Nutr. 2020 May 1;150(5):985-988
pubmed: 32061173
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021
pubmed: 33309175
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jul;90(1):193-201
pubmed: 19439455
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e012865
pubmed: 31387433
Biometrics. 2009 Dec;65(4):1003-10
pubmed: 19302405
Metabolism. 2010 Dec;59(12):1833-42
pubmed: 20667561