Early Access to Medicines: Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) as a Decision Tool in Catalonia (Spain).
MCDA
assessment
drug policy
early access
multicriteria decision analysis
pharmaceuticals
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2022
01 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
20
01
2022
revised:
21
02
2022
accepted:
24
02
2022
entrez:
10
3
2022
pubmed:
11
3
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early access to medicines allows the prescription of a medicine before it is available in the public formulary to patients with severe or rare diseases with high unmet needs who have no authorised therapeutic alternatives available. In this context, consistent decision making is difficult, and a systematic assessment procedure could be useful to tackle complex situations and guarantee the equity of medicines' access. A multidisciplinary panel (MP) conducted four workshops to develop an early access framework based on a reflective multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). A set of 12 criteria was agreed: eight quantitative (severity of disease, urgency, efficacy, safety, internal and external validity, therapeutic benefit and plausibility) and four qualitative (therapeutic alternative, existence of precedents, management impact and costs). Quantitative criteria were weighted using a five-point scale. The relative importance of quantitative criteria had mean weights from 4.7 to 3.6, showing its relevance in the decisions. The framework was tested using two case studies, and reliability was assessed by re-test. The re-test revealed no statistical differences, indicating the consistency and replicability of the framework developed. MCDA may help to structure discussions for heterogeneous treatment requests, providing predictability and robustness in decision making involving sensitive and complex situations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35268443
pii: jcm11051353
doi: 10.3390/jcm11051353
pmc: PMC8910942
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;87(2):395-405
pubmed: 32529733
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 30;11:329
pubmed: 22129247
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jan;30(1):105-12
pubmed: 24451150
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 05;6:328
pubmed: 30568938
Trials. 2010 Nov 12;11:104
pubmed: 21073691
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Apr 26;16(1):186
pubmed: 33902672
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jun 27;14(1):157
pubmed: 31248421
Front Oncol. 2020 Sep 02;10:1604
pubmed: 32984026
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):376-88
pubmed: 21987539
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Oct;21(10):680-686
pubmed: 34518662
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 13;10:111
pubmed: 30814951
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):256-260
pubmed: 28237205
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 14;11:1203
pubmed: 32922287
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):111-120
pubmed: 28434413
Med Decis Making. 2020 Aug;40(6):830-845
pubmed: 32845234
ESMO Open. 2019 Nov 13;4(6):e000550
pubmed: 31798977
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011 Jul;27(3):253-60
pubmed: 21756413
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;19(1):123-152
pubmed: 28303438
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):1-13
pubmed: 26797229
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(11):1385-93
pubmed: 25196202
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):56-63
pubmed: 30730288
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):1812-26
pubmed: 24635949
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 22;8:270
pubmed: 19102752
Health Policy. 2019 Jul;123(7):630-634
pubmed: 31130319
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Oct;43(5):591-599
pubmed: 30205873
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 14;21(1):814
pubmed: 34391431
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):4-8
pubmed: 26955570
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):519-526
pubmed: 30348241
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-37
pubmed: 27021745