Feasibility of 4D-Spatio Temporal Image Correlation (STIC) in the Comprehensive Assessment of the Fetal Heart Using FetalHQ
STIC
fetal cardiac function
fetal echocardiography
prenatal ultrasound
speckle tracking echocardiography
strain
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Mar 2022
04 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
13
01
2022
revised:
02
03
2022
accepted:
02
03
2022
entrez:
10
3
2022
pubmed:
11
3
2022
medline:
11
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fetal Heart Quantification (FetalHQ®) is a novel speckle tracking software that permits the study of global and regional ventricular shape and function from a 2D four-chamber-view loop. The 4D-Spatio Temporal Image Correlation (STIC) modality enables the offline analysis of optimized and perfectly aligned cardiac planes. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of 4D-STIC speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) using FetalHQ® and to compare it to 2D STE. We conducted a prospective study including 31 low-risk singleton pregnancies between 20 and 40 weeks of gestation. Four-chamber view volumes and 2D clips were acquired with an apex pointing at 45° and with a frame rate higher than 60 Hz. Morphometric and functional echocardiography was performed by FetalHQ®. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Our results showed excellent reproducibility (ICC > 0.900) for morphometric evaluation (biventricular area, longitudinal and transverse diameters). Reproducibility was also good (ICC > 0.800) for functional evaluation (biventricular strain, Fractional Area Change, left ventricle volumes, ejection fraction and cardiac output). On the contrary, the study of the sphericity index and shortening fraction of the different ventricular segments showed lower reproducibility (ICC < 0.800). To conclude, 4D-STIC is feasible, reproducible and comparable to 2D echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac morphometry and function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35268505
pii: jcm11051414
doi: 10.3390/jcm11051414
pmc: PMC8911117
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
ID : INT21/00027, PI17/00675, PI18/00073 and PI20/00246
Références
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 May;37(5):1129-1141
pubmed: 29068072
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;35(3):318-23
pubmed: 20127758
Ultrasound Int Open. 2017 Feb;3(1):E26-E33
pubmed: 28210715
Br Heart J. 1982 Jun;47(6):573-83
pubmed: 7082505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 12;51(6):651-9
pubmed: 18261685
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):116-26
pubmed: 20842655
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008 Nov;9(6):754-6
pubmed: 18490298
Echocardiography. 2013 Apr;30(4):447-59
pubmed: 23551605
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Dec 6;:1-7
pubmed: 33280470
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Dec;40(12):2537-2548
pubmed: 33502041
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Apr;29(4):341-9
pubmed: 26797677
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 May;37(5):1159-1171
pubmed: 29086430
Pediatrics. 1980 Jun;65(6):1059-67
pubmed: 7375228
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;41(3):348-59
pubmed: 23460196
Echocardiography. 2017 Dec;34(12):1788-1798
pubmed: 29287138
Echocardiography. 2009 Jan;26(1):28-36
pubmed: 19017328
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;37(2):143-9
pubmed: 20549769
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):219-228
pubmed: 29536575
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):498.e1-498.e22
pubmed: 31153929
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):575-581
pubmed: 30740804
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Mar;29(3):209-225.e6
pubmed: 26747685
J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Aug;35(8):1765-81
pubmed: 27353066
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Apr;156(4):955-7
pubmed: 3578406
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Nov;16(4):158-167
pubmed: 28191192
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):30-8
pubmed: 22626950
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;36(4):458-64
pubmed: 20549767
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:178-187
pubmed: 32446149
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 Aug 22;11:32
pubmed: 23964663
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):105-11
pubmed: 22033231
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;12(6):404-18
pubmed: 9918089
Circulation. 2005 Oct 4;112(14):2157-62
pubmed: 16203928
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;16(1):1-11
pubmed: 25525063
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun 23;:1-6
pubmed: 34162291
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Feb;21(2):146-50
pubmed: 17628416
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;57(4):607-613
pubmed: 32691497
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):39-46
pubmed: 22626849
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Aug;67(8):651-8
pubmed: 25037544
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Mar;101(3):163-9
pubmed: 18477943
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(7):541-550
pubmed: 34515112
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(5):399-410
pubmed: 31822009
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):96-108
pubmed: 22722425
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;87(5):594-600
pubmed: 11230845
J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep;40(9):1955-1961
pubmed: 33174649
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 May;38(5):1309-1318
pubmed: 30208238
J Perinat Med. 2020 Oct 22;49(3):371-376
pubmed: 33085638
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Dec;37(12):1203-1212
pubmed: 29023931
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 May;21(5):470-4
pubmed: 17904801
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jan;136(1):20-4
pubmed: 17287065
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Apr;38(4):1039-1047
pubmed: 30280404
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Jan;41(1):136-144
pubmed: 33015877
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 May;38(5):1209-1221
pubmed: 30244474
Theriogenology. 2010 Jun;73(9):1167-79
pubmed: 20138353
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;54(5):703-704
pubmed: 31688995
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr 6;:1-7
pubmed: 33823732
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):650-658
pubmed: 28437575
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;57(2):282-291
pubmed: 32022339
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Sep;33(9):1141-1146.e2
pubmed: 32423727
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Apr;23(4):351-69; quiz 453-5
pubmed: 20362924