Dentin Exposure after Tooth Preparation for Laminate Veneers: A Microscopical Analysis to Evaluate the Influence of Operators' Expertise.

cad/cam ceramics dentin esthetic dentistry laminate veneers minimally invasive porcelain tooth preparation veneer preparation veneers

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 26 10 2021
revised: 02 02 2022
accepted: 24 02 2022
entrez: 10 3 2022
pubmed: 11 3 2022
medline: 11 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background: To assess the quantity of dentin exposure detected by 3 operators with different clinical expertise for 2 designs of tooth preparation for laminate veneers: window (WI) and butt joint (BJ). Methods: 20 intact maxillary central incisors were collected and then prepared for laminate veneers to a depth of 0.6 mm, with a cervical mini-chamfer finish line of 0.3 mm. Each prepared tooth was analyzed by 3 operators with different expertise: undergraduate student (ST), general practitioner (GP), and prosthodontist (PR), at sight under magnification. Besides descriptive statistics (CI 95%), 2-way ANOVA and Games−Howell tests were used to analyze differences among groups (α = 0.05). Results: The means of percentage and area of detected dentin exposure were WI = 30.48%, 21.57 mm2; BJ = 30.99%, 21.97 mm2; ST/WI = 22.82%, 16.44 mm2; GP/WI = 58.05%, 40.64 mm2; PR/WI = 10.55%, 7.63 mm2; ST/BJ = 28.99%, 20.83 mm2; GP/BJ = 40.56%, 28.32 mm2; PR/BJ = 23.42%, 16.75 mm2. Significant differences were found between ST/WI vs. GP/WI (p = 0.005) and GP/WI vs. PR/WI (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There was no difference in detection of exposed dentin among operators with different expertise for BJ preparation, whereas differences were found between the general practitioner and the other 2 operators in WI. Moreover, the quantity of exposed dentin was not related to different tooth preparation designs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35268994
pii: ma15051763
doi: 10.3390/ma15051763
pmc: PMC8911512
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Methods Mol Biol. 2012;887:1-13
pubmed: 22566041
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Nov-Dec;25(6):604-12
pubmed: 23101040
J Dent. 2000 Mar;28(3):163-77
pubmed: 10709338
Oper Dent. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):E197-E213
pubmed: 29144878
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012 Aug;24(4):257-65
pubmed: 22863131
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):134
pubmed: 31272441
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1281-1289
pubmed: 32613436
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012 Summer;7(2):138-52
pubmed: 22645729
J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:1-7
pubmed: 27328640
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5S):e1-e105
pubmed: 28418832
J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Jan;149(1):25-37
pubmed: 29304908
Gen Dent. 2007 Nov;55(7):686-94; quiz 695-6, 712
pubmed: 18069513
Dent Today. 2005 Mar;24(3):86, 88, 90-1
pubmed: 15816665
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Dec 14;6(12):2402-2408
pubmed: 30607201
J Adhes Dent. 2013 Jun;15(3):215-20
pubmed: 23593640
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Dec;32(6):625-35
pubmed: 23057051
Acta Biomater. 2020 Apr 15;107:1-24
pubmed: 32087326
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):38-49
pubmed: 26757327
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):3
pubmed: 34996438
Dent Mater J. 2021 Mar 31;40(2):331-338
pubmed: 33162456
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Nov;91(2):727-36
pubmed: 19582860
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Aug;24(8):2745-2754
pubmed: 31900673
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Oct;12(5):403-13
pubmed: 20157681
Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7):1042-1052
pubmed: 31084936
J Conserv Dent. 2011 Jan;14(1):10-5
pubmed: 21691498
Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):389-96
pubmed: 17695870
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan/Feb;32(1):59-65
pubmed: 30677113
J Dent. 2021 Jun;109:103661
pubmed: 33864886
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 May;95(5):354-63
pubmed: 16679130
Med Pharm Rep. 2021 Jan;94(1):22-27
pubmed: 33629044
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(5):407-13
pubmed: 1343012
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):79-85
pubmed: 22259802
Int J Esthet Dent. 2021 Oct 29;16(4):554-569
pubmed: 34694079
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 Aug 15;6(3):120-6
pubmed: 16127480
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Nov;94(5):414-20
pubmed: 16275300

Auteurs

Roberto Sorrentino (R)

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Gennaro Ruggiero (G)

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Bruna Borelli (B)

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Alberta Barlattani (A)

Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Fernando Zarone (F)

Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Classifications MeSH