Patients as experts in the illness experience: Implications for the ethics of patient involvement in health professions education.

cultural diversity ethics expert patients medical education patient engagement patient participation

Journal

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
revised: 23 02 2022
received: 22 02 2022
accepted: 24 02 2022
pubmed: 12 3 2022
medline: 28 9 2022
entrez: 11 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In response to calls to increase patient involvement in health professions education (HPE), educators are inviting patients to play a range of roles in the teaching of clinical trainees. However, there are concerns that patients involved in educational programs are seen as representing a demographic larger than themselves: their disease, their social group or even patients as a whole. This leads to difficult ethical challenges related to representation, including problems of tokenistic inclusion and of inadvertently essentializing marginalized groups. We propose that conceptualizing patients as experts in their illness experience can help resolve these dilemmas of representation equitably and effectively. Just as clinical experts are involved in HPE to share their expertise and represent their clinical experience, so too should patients be invited to participate in HPE explicitly for their expertise in their illness experience. This framing clarifies the goals of patient involvement as technocratic rather than tokenistic, mandates meaningful contributions by patients, and helps frame patient involvement for learners as the presentation of expert perspectives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35274414
doi: 10.1111/jep.13672
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

794-800

Informations de copyright

© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Towle A. Where's the patient's voice in health professional education? Comunicação Saúde Educação. 2016;20(57):285-288.
Rowland P, Kumagai AK. Dilemmas of representation: patient engagement in health professions education. Acad Med. 2018;93(6):869-873. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001971
Towle A, Godolphin W. A meeting of experts: the emerging roles of non-professionals in the education of health professionals. Teach High Educ. 2011;16(5):495-504.
Kitto S. Strategies for teaching the sociological imagination to medical students: the role of embodiment. Health Sociol Rev. 2004;13(1):74-86.
Lauckner H, Doucet S, Wells S. Patients as educators: The challenges and benefits of sharing experiences with students. Med Educ. 2012;46(10):992-1000.
Sharma M. ‘Can the patient speak?’: postcolonialism and patient involvement in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2018;52(5):471-479.
Reader S. The other side of agency. Philosophy. 2007;82(322):579-604.
Becker RE. Remembering Sir William Osler 100 years after his death: what can we learn from his legacy? Lancet. 2014;384(9961):2260-2263. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61887-0
Osler W. The hospital as college. In: Osler W, ed. Aequanimitas: with other addresses to medical students, nurses and practitioners of medicine. Ch. XVI. Lewis; 1904.
Towle A, Bainbridge L, Godolphin W, et al. Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):64-74. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x
Voronka J, Costa L. Disordering social inclusion: ethics, critiques, collaborations, futurities. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia. 2019;10:1-10.
Figar N, Đorđević B. Managing an ethical dilemma. Econ Themes. 2016;54(3):345-362.
Greenhalgh T, Woodard F, Humphrey C. Inherent tensions in involving users. In: Greenhalgh T, Woodard F, Humphrey C, eds. User Involvement in Health Care. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
Bollard M, Lahiff J, Parkes N. Involving people with learning disabilities in nurse education: towards an inclusive approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(2):173-177. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.002
Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud. 1988;14(3):575.
Tritter JQ, McCallum A. The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy. 2006;76(2):156-168. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008
Rowland P, McMillan S, McGillicuddy P, Richards J. What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories. Health. 2017;21(1):76-92. doi:10.1177/1363459316644494
Morgan A, Jones D. Perceptions of service user and carer involvement in healthcare education and impact on students' knowledge and practice: a literature review. Med Teach. 2009;31(2):82-95. doi:10.1080/01421590802526946
Kelly D, Wykurz G. Patients as teachers: a new perspective in medical education. Educ Health: Change Learn Pract. 1998;11(3):369-377.
Rees CE, Knight LV, Wilkinson CE. “User Involvement Is a Sine Qua Non, Almost, in Medical Education”: learning with rather than just about health and social care service users. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2006;12(3):359-390.
Rowland P, Anderson M, Kumagai AK, McMillan S, Sandhu VK, Langlois S. Patient involvement in health professionals' education: a meta-narrative review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019;24(3):595-617. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-9857-7
Roebotham T, Hawthornthwaite L, Lee L, Lingard LA. Beyond catharsis: the nuanced emotion of patient storytellers in an educational role. Med Educ. 2018;52(5):526-535. doi:10.1111/medu.13510
Joseph AJ. Constituting “Lived experience” discourses in mental health: the ethics of racialized identification/representation and the erasure of intergeneration colonial violence. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia. 2019;10:1-23.
Tuckett D. Meetings Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations. Tavistock; 1985: vii, 290pp.
Gavin F. The risks of equating ‘lived experience’ with patient expertise. Healthy Debate. 2019
O'Farrell, C. Michel Foucault. SAGE Publications; 2005: xiv, 184pp.
Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press; 2007.
Kumagai AK, Wear D. "Making strange": a role for the humanities in medical education. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):973-977. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000269
Hanan A. A view from somewhere: explaining the paradigms of educational research. J Philos Educ. 2006;40(2):205-221.
Moniz T, Costella J, Golafshani M, Watling C, Lingard L. Bringing narratives from physicians, patients and caregivers together: a scoping review of published research. Med Humanit. 2019;47:27-37. doi:10.1136/medhum-2017-011424
Williamson C. How do we find the right patients to consult?. Qual Prim Care. 2007;15:195-199.
Lloyd C. The stigmatization of problem drug users: a narrative literature review. Drugs: Educ Prev Policy. 2013;20(2):85-95.
Centre of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public (CEPPP). Accessed August 23, 2021. https://ceppp.ca/en/

Auteurs

Ariel Lefkowitz (A)

Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Julie Vizza (J)

Faculty of Health Science, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.

Ayelet Kuper (A)

Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
The Wilson Centre, University Health Network/University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH