Cardiotoxicity risk factors with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiotoxicity
Heart failure
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Immunotherapy
Myocarditis
Pericarditis
Programmed death ligand
Journal
Cardio-oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 2057-3804
Titre abrégé: Cardiooncology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101689938
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Mar 2022
11 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
10
06
2021
accepted:
21
02
2022
entrez:
12
3
2022
pubmed:
13
3
2022
medline:
13
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Checkpoint-inhibitor immunotherapies have had a profound effect in the treatment of cancer by inhibiting down-regulation of T-cell response to malignancy. The cardiotoxic potential of these agents was first described in murine models and, more recently, in numerous clinical case reports of pericarditis, myocarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiomyopathy, and new arrhythmias. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of and associated risk factors for cardiotoxic events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Medical records of patients who underwent immunotherapy with durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab at Wake Forest Baptist Health were reviewed. We collected retrospective data regarding sex, cancer type, age, and cardiovascular disease risk factors and medications. We aimed to identify new diagnoses of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, myocarditis, and pericarditis after therapy onset. To assess the relationship between CVD risk factors and the number of cardiac events, a multivariate model was applied using generalized linear regression. Incidence rate ratios were calculated for every covariate along with the adjusted P-value. We applied a multivariate model using logistic regression to assess the relationship between CVD risk factors and mortality. Odds ratios were calculated for every covariate along with the adjusted P-value. Adjusted P-values were calculated using multivariable regression adjusting for other covariates. Review of 538 medical records revealed the following events: 3 ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, 12 pericarditis, 11 atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate, 0 myocarditis, 8 heart failure. Significant risk factors included female gender, African American race, and tobacco use with IRR 3.34 (95% CI 1.421, 7.849; P = 0.006), IRR 3.39 (95% CI 1.141, 10.055; P = 0.028), and IRR 4.21 (95% CI 1.289, 13.763; P = 0.017) respectively. Our study revealed 34 significant events, most frequent being pericarditis (2.2%) and atrial fibrillation (2.0%) with strongest risk factors being female gender, African American race, and tobacco use. Patients who meet this demographic, particularly those with planned pembrolizumab treatment, may benefit from early referral to a cardio-oncologist. Further investigation is warranted on the relationship between CTLA-4 and PD-L1 expression and cardiac adverse events with ICIs, particularly for these subpopulations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Checkpoint-inhibitor immunotherapies have had a profound effect in the treatment of cancer by inhibiting down-regulation of T-cell response to malignancy. The cardiotoxic potential of these agents was first described in murine models and, more recently, in numerous clinical case reports of pericarditis, myocarditis, pericardial effusion, cardiomyopathy, and new arrhythmias. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of and associated risk factors for cardiotoxic events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
METHODS
METHODS
Medical records of patients who underwent immunotherapy with durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab at Wake Forest Baptist Health were reviewed. We collected retrospective data regarding sex, cancer type, age, and cardiovascular disease risk factors and medications. We aimed to identify new diagnoses of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, myocarditis, and pericarditis after therapy onset. To assess the relationship between CVD risk factors and the number of cardiac events, a multivariate model was applied using generalized linear regression. Incidence rate ratios were calculated for every covariate along with the adjusted P-value. We applied a multivariate model using logistic regression to assess the relationship between CVD risk factors and mortality. Odds ratios were calculated for every covariate along with the adjusted P-value. Adjusted P-values were calculated using multivariable regression adjusting for other covariates.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Review of 538 medical records revealed the following events: 3 ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia, 12 pericarditis, 11 atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rate, 0 myocarditis, 8 heart failure. Significant risk factors included female gender, African American race, and tobacco use with IRR 3.34 (95% CI 1.421, 7.849; P = 0.006), IRR 3.39 (95% CI 1.141, 10.055; P = 0.028), and IRR 4.21 (95% CI 1.289, 13.763; P = 0.017) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study revealed 34 significant events, most frequent being pericarditis (2.2%) and atrial fibrillation (2.0%) with strongest risk factors being female gender, African American race, and tobacco use. Patients who meet this demographic, particularly those with planned pembrolizumab treatment, may benefit from early referral to a cardio-oncologist. Further investigation is warranted on the relationship between CTLA-4 and PD-L1 expression and cardiac adverse events with ICIs, particularly for these subpopulations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35277208
doi: 10.1186/s40959-022-00130-5
pii: 10.1186/s40959-022-00130-5
pmc: PMC8915459
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015;2015:794842
pubmed: 25918658
J Immunother Cancer. 2015 Feb 17;3:4
pubmed: 25705383
J Immunother Cancer. 2015 Apr 21;3:11
pubmed: 25901283
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 03;375(18):1749-1755
pubmed: 27806233
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Nov;12(11):2777-2789
pubmed: 27398650
Nat Med. 2003 Dec;9(12):1477-83
pubmed: 14595408
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1920-1926
pubmed: 32312493
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;48(1):7-12
pubmed: 29045749
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Feb 08;8:49
pubmed: 28228726
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Jan 23;6:3
pubmed: 30729114
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jan 6;112(1):95-102
pubmed: 25349974
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Aug;14(8):561-84
pubmed: 26228759
Cell Prolif. 2019 Mar;52(2):e12537
pubmed: 30443950
Ethn Dis. 2011 Spring;21(2):142-9
pubmed: 21749016
J Immunol. 2008 Aug 15;181(4):2513-21
pubmed: 18684942
Int Immunol. 2010 Jun;22(6):443-52
pubmed: 20410257
Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(3):133-150
pubmed: 30755690
Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):111-7
pubmed: 19540400
Science. 2001 Jan 12;291(5502):319-22
pubmed: 11209085
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1755-1764
pubmed: 29567210
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jan;18(1):215-22
pubmed: 19124500
Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 15;93(10):1238-42
pubmed: 15135696
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):e447-e458
pubmed: 30191849
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94
pubmed: 25667295
Circulation. 2017 Nov 21;136(21):2085-2087
pubmed: 29158217
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 23;114(21):E4223-E4232
pubmed: 28484017
Heart. 2008 Apr;94(4):498-501
pubmed: 17575329
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1424-31
pubmed: 23470495
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2691-7
pubmed: 22614989
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Dec 1;58(Suppl 7):vii59-vii67
pubmed: 31816080
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;23(23):7412-7425
pubmed: 29196495
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1579-1589
pubmed: 30442497