Coverage Disruptions and Transitions Across the ACA's Medicaid/Marketplace Income Cutoff.

Affordable Care Act Marketplace Medicaid continuity of coverage health insurance health policy income-based insurance eligibility vulnerable populations

Journal

Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
received: 14 07 2021
accepted: 26 01 2022
pubmed: 13 3 2022
medline: 25 10 2022
entrez: 12 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Affordable Care Act takes a "patchwork" approach to expanding coverage: Medicaid covers individuals with incomes 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) in expansion states, while subsidized Marketplace insurance is available to those above this income cutoff. To characterize the magnitude of churning between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage and to examine the impact of the 138% FPL income cutoff on stability of coverage. We measured the incidence of transitions between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage. Then, we used a differences-in-differences framework to compare insurance churning in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states, before and after the ACA, among adults with incomes 100-200% of poverty. Non-elderly adult respondents of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010-2018 MAIN MEASURES: The annual proportion of adults who (1) transitioned between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage; (2) experienced any coverage disruption. One million U.S. adults transitioned between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage annually. The 138% FPL cutoff in expansion states was not associated with an increase in insurance churning among individuals with incomes close to the cutoff. Transitions between Medicaid and Marketplace insurance are uncommon-far lower than pre-ACA analyses predicted. The 138% income cutoff does not to contribute significantly to insurance disruptions.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Affordable Care Act takes a "patchwork" approach to expanding coverage: Medicaid covers individuals with incomes 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) in expansion states, while subsidized Marketplace insurance is available to those above this income cutoff.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the magnitude of churning between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage and to examine the impact of the 138% FPL income cutoff on stability of coverage.
DESIGN
We measured the incidence of transitions between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage. Then, we used a differences-in-differences framework to compare insurance churning in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states, before and after the ACA, among adults with incomes 100-200% of poverty.
PARTICIPANTS
Non-elderly adult respondents of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2010-2018 MAIN MEASURES: The annual proportion of adults who (1) transitioned between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage; (2) experienced any coverage disruption.
KEY RESULTS
One million U.S. adults transitioned between Medicaid and Marketplace coverage annually. The 138% FPL cutoff in expansion states was not associated with an increase in insurance churning among individuals with incomes close to the cutoff.
CONCLUSIONS
Transitions between Medicaid and Marketplace insurance are uncommon-far lower than pre-ACA analyses predicted. The 138% income cutoff does not to contribute significantly to insurance disruptions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35277806
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07437-0
pii: 10.1007/s11606-022-07437-0
pmc: PMC9585127
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3570-3576

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

Références

Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):e1026-32
pubmed: 17473075
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):85-93
pubmed: 31905055
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1919-1924
pubmed: 31228048
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):255-74
pubmed: 22091735
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 28;353(4):382-91
pubmed: 16049210
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Oct 1;35(10):1816-1824
pubmed: 27702954
Inquiry. 2007-2008 Winter;44(4):443-68
pubmed: 18338518
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jan;2(1):
pubmed: 35601359
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 15;365(24):e44
pubmed: 22129219
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2005 Sep;(855):1-12
pubmed: 16180284
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Mar 1;2(3):e210305
pubmed: 36218458
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jun;31(6):1314-20
pubmed: 22665844
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1180-7
pubmed: 26153313
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 06;10:195
pubmed: 20604965
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):228-36
pubmed: 21289343

Auteurs

Anna L Goldman (AL)

Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Anna.Goldman@bmc.org.
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Anna.Goldman@bmc.org.

Sarah H Gordon (SH)

Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH